to the nova haters: https://www.prepscholar.com/sat/s/colleges/Villanova-admission-requirements |
Grow up. |
As it should be?? Maybe crawl out from under your rock and pay attention to the news - testing is no longer the be all end all to determine a student's college placement. Also, if you're going to say that kids should be able to get a decent score then maybe do a quick spell check before writing STA instead of SAT. |
|
Think of “test optional” the same way your player would view an “optional practice”; she doesn’t have to do it, but she’s still expected to - and it will distinguish her from those who don’t.
Regardless if a school has a test optional policy, coaches at top academics will still ask if your DD has taken the SAT or ACT. The job of any player with dreams of playing at a strong academic is to make herself as recruitable as possible. Being a naturally-gifted athlete and playing on the right team with a history of recruiting success are two parts of this equation. Having good grades and good scores are the other two. Meeting a coach’s minimum score threshold makes it easier on them to help a player navigate admissions. Not taking the test makes a coach’s job harder. You don’t want to make a coach’s job harder. If your DD doesn’t take the SAT / ACT coaches will ask what her PSAT score is. Students usually take this mid sophomore year and don’t do well because they haven’t prepped for it. You want to avoid being in this position. If your DD takes the test and the number meets a coach’s minimum threshold, the player is in good shape. If it’s in the ballpark, the player could be asked to take it again. Scores still matter. 25s and younger should begin working toward these tests by practicing / tutoring now. |
|
Does NCAA eligibility still require a test score? If the school is test optional, then I have found that applies to athletes. We have always heard if your scores are high, submit them, which helps with merit.
|
What is this suppose to prove? I still don’t think Villanova is an above average academic school. |
|
Some schools - especially Ivies and the academies - have been asking for test scores, but the NCAA has served ALL of them with notices that you cannot have two separate requirements for the same class of student. Also the NCAA has already made it clear that tests are optional through 2023, and next month are voting on making it permanent which given the California and Harvard lawsuits, you can reasonably expect this policy to be made permanent. Here's the link to the NCAA governance section - https://www.ncaa.org/news/2022/2/16/media-center-proposals-to-drop-test-scores-for-incoming-college-athletes-advance.aspx
|
Let’s not kid ourselves. This proposal is driven by the big revenue generating sports where the student in student athlete doesn’t really exist for many playing these sports. |
what is your definition of an above average school? what metrics are you using? |
There are two distinct tiers of sports in school - revenue and non-revenue. The non-revenue sports exist, especially on the girls side due to Title IX, because the revenue sports allow it. If the SEC and BigTen+ decided that they wanted a better split of the revenue, they could unilaterally end the NCAA. Period. So don't think this proposal has anything to do with the revenue sports. Bigger fish to fry. |
Ditto. Totally mediocre school. |
The only one living under a rock is the one who cannot earn a solid SAT/ACT score. Testing will come back fully within the decade once these colleges see how poorly students who cannot earn a high standardized test score perform at their schools. It’s a given and just a matter of time. |
Both of you stop. Villanova isn't an Ivy but it certainly is a very good school. |
Wrong Title IX is federal law and not an NCAA rule. Killing the NCAA would not end title IX. |
It’s not a very good school. It’s a very middle tier school. Seriously. Stop kidding yourself. Lot of better schools out there below Ivies but better than Villanova. |