Duke |
What does the last sentence mean ? If I understand, then this poster doesn't have a clue. |
There's always an idiot in the crowd. To whomever posted the above absurdity--nobody believes you. |
Where does the cross admit data come from? If it's Parchment then it's unreliable data... |
+1 The inclusion of state schools makes this list meaningless. |
This reflects the preponderance of interest in majoring in STEM. |
I'm a little interested in this, only because it takes away the yield rates etc that highly depend on ED or SCEA tips.
|
But I dont really care about Yale vs Princeton.
I would be more interested in kids who pick UT Austin over Rice. Or Rice over Northwestern. Or Northwestern over Notre Dame. Or Notre Dame over Dartmouth. |
Crimson sourced their own cross admit data from their students and other counselors |
The ranking takes into account all the cross admit yields between ranked schools |
Data is biased since only a small segment of the overall population would pay for their services.
|
They’ve gone beyond to source from other areas as well. For the most part the ranking aligns with what we expect, maybe except the 11 - 15 ranks that speak to value of top public’s and schools w particularly strong alumni base |
Sounds like the Crimson marketing machine at its full gear. A smart strategy to get their name out in hopes of attracting future customers. Hook, line, sinker?....maybe, maybe not |
Stanford is 40% instate |
What do you base that on? I've heard that the cross admit data is very accurate for schools with large applicant figures, but less so for smaller schools. |