I have a parent who remarried and I have two stepsiblings. thre are significant family assets on all sides (eg my step siblings have a wealthy side of the family on their nonbio side) and my other parent has assets.
My remarried parent and his spouse have assets in the tens of millions. I think they have done it right because they felt they could share their will with all of the family while still healthy. It is fair. The will stipulates that when one spouse dies, remaining assets go into a trust that is then distributed among the children after the remaining spouse's death. I don't expect to inherit much and am launched and happy I am fine if I never do. But what is important is that everyone is happy with this arrangement. Incidentally, my estranged stepsister who ignores her mother is treated equally. I have no opinion whatsover about this. OP, I'd encourage you to get an experienced estate attorney and honestly to get the opinion of multiple about your options and what is deemed fair. In general, I would expect that if this is truly your parents' money and it has never been touched and hasn't affected your lifestyle that it would be your descendants' and not yur DH's descendants. But I am not an attorney. You should create an arrangement that you and your DH are both ok with now and can live your life honestly about. that said, it will depend largely on how your life has gone. If you have raised these step children as your own from toddlerhood they will see things differently than if you and your DH married two years ago and the stepsibling is grown and close with their other family. |
How is that fine from the dad’s perspective? His oldest child gets a significantly smaller inheritance. The idea that the biomom or grandparents will equalize things is completely speculative. If I was the dad I would not agree to this. If my wife insisted I would buy an additional life insurance policy at a minimum for the oldest child. It also depends on the amount of money we’re talking about. If the oldest child wouldn’t even get enough for college that would be unfortunate. Given OP’s attitude, I hope that her DH writes a will that guarantees some money goes directly to his oldest if he dies first. Otherwise we all know what’s happening to it … |
God being an ACOD really never stops being a pain
|
It’s not so much OP’s step kid not getting “her” money, but also the insistence that her DH also agree to splitting the joint assets equally. Win-win for her kids, lose-lose for the step. |
Yeah no. Unless this stepkid’s mother and maternal grandparents are all going to pool and equalize inheritances with OPs children with whom they share no relation then why should OP take her family’s money and give it to this child. |
There is no way I'd agree to my husband's kids getting my inheritance money. (luckily it's a non-issue in our home). His kids have two parents who can decide what they inherit, but that is not my responsibility and I didn't raise them. My responsibility is to look after my kids and grandkids and they are 100% my responsibility (if I felt that way about the step-kids and grandkids that might be different). Each set of kids has two different set of parents and they inherit from those parents if those parents have anything to give and choose to give it to them. |
His oldest kids will inherit from mom and her relatives. That mom and relatives are not making it equal with OP kids. Things in life aren't equal. That's ok. |
Split the estate 50/50 between the husband and wife. Then only his kids inherit from his half and all the kids inherit her/their moms half, including this kid so she’s not getting a portion from both of these people only her mom here. Some people do it this way. She’ll have to chase her biological dad down for whatever she’s entitled to from him. |
All 4 of the children are his. |
It sounded to me like OPs 3 children are by her husband and that her husband had a daughter from a prior relationship. |
What you’re missing is that Stepmother wants to pressure her husband to exacerbate the inequality by leaving Stepchild with a smaller overall inheritance. Her husband may very well not agree to that. If the 3 joint kids are taken care of fully by OP’s family money, then her husband may reasonably want to give a larger share of the joint assets to the biological child. At a minimum it would be fair for all of his pre-second-marriage assets to the oldest child. |
That's one approach but without knowing the various inheritance amounts possible for each child, it's tough to say. |
I don’t understand the responses. The step dc gets the same amount as the other three dcs. Then the step dc also gets whatever amount from the bio moms side. The three dcs get a split from the step mom’s side. We have no idea what the amounts are. Does it change anything if the mom is super wealthy and the step dc ends up with more money than the other dcs? It’s so silly!
Split the bio money evenly with any kids. The step money on either side can go to the bio kids of the step parents. Done! |
I know very fee would agree with me but I only feel responsible for my bio kid.
I would maybe leave a token gift |
I think each situation is distinct. I have a stepchild whose parent (spouse’s ex) has a much greater net worth (by a factor of 10?) than we do. Stepchild is only and will inherit it all. Their siblings (my kids) get all my money and dh is splitting his evenly … |