RW vs LW news

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]

Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.

You clearly did not read his piece if this is your take away.

No, I read it alright. He’s working the refs and he doesn’t live in reality. For example, as another PP pointed out, the Trump campaign really did work with Russia. When the far right claimed “lab leak!” they did so without any evidence and from a place of not only racism, but a place that then vacated their agency to act responsibly in regards to preventing infection. Kind of like someone who sleeps around without protection and without getting tested.

And you’re so siloed that you don’t understand any of this because you don’t consume NPR, you consume OAN and Fox. Your only brush with NPR - which, BTW, has tilted as far right as every other allegedly “neutral” outlet - is this article and the podcast with Bari Weiss and the right wing’s obsessive hatred of public media. So forgive the rest of us for disagreeing with one nutjob right winger’s take.

Uri Berliner is NOT right wing. At all. You bet he is.

The whole Russian collusion story was a hoax started by the DNC and Hillary Clinton. That, my dear, is fact. No, my darling, it is not.

And, the claim of the lab leak was based on SCIENCE. The fact that no bats were within flying distance of the wet market was one piece of science. Then, there was the video of the lab worker that was censored by China. It wasn’t based on science, at least not at the time. You don’t seem to understand that wet markets bring in animals from a pretty wide area, that people actually do travel. It was an argument grounded solely in the GOP’s hatred of Asian people.
I cannot believe you are crying racism. That is rich.

As I said, you’re so siloed you don’t even know what you don’t know. As much as I think NPR is centrist-right wing trash, you’d be a thousand times better informed if you listened or read them.

Good grief. You talk about being "siloed" when that is EXACTLY what you are.
And, your statement above is simply laughable.

Don't bother meeting reality. You claim "reality has a liberal bias."
When that "reality" denies facts and evidence because they are inconvenient to the narrative and ignores stories that don't meet with the approval of the liberal audience, I guess you are right. The reality is groups like NPR are choosing a "reality" that is not grounded in truth.

Do you have cites for your claim? I have one based on some reporting from earlier today: NPR journos were instructed to report an HRC lie for every time Trump lied. When they were asked how to handle if one candidate didn't lie as much as the other, they were met with silence.

I think Berliner did a fine job of citing the claims.
Like ignoring the Hunter laptop story. And, we know they did this intentionally.

Remember this?



And, Berliner tells how one editor was happy they didn't cover it because "it could help Trump."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]

Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.

You clearly did not read his piece if this is your take away.

No, I read it alright. He’s working the refs and he doesn’t live in reality. For example, as another PP pointed out, the Trump campaign really did work with Russia. When the far right claimed “lab leak!” they did so without any evidence and from a place of not only racism, but a place that then vacated their agency to act responsibly in regards to preventing infection. Kind of like someone who sleeps around without protection and without getting tested.

And you’re so siloed that you don’t understand any of this because you don’t consume NPR, you consume OAN and Fox. Your only brush with NPR - which, BTW, has tilted as far right as every other allegedly “neutral” outlet - is this article and the podcast with Bari Weiss and the right wing’s obsessive hatred of public media. So forgive the rest of us for disagreeing with one nutjob right winger’s take.

Uri Berliner is NOT right wing. At all. You bet he is.

The whole Russian collusion story was a hoax started by the DNC and Hillary Clinton. That, my dear, is fact. No, my darling, it is not.

And, the claim of the lab leak was based on SCIENCE. The fact that no bats were within flying distance of the wet market was one piece of science. Then, there was the video of the lab worker that was censored by China. It wasn’t based on science, at least not at the time. You don’t seem to understand that wet markets bring in animals from a pretty wide area, that people actually do travel. It was an argument grounded solely in the GOP’s hatred of Asian people.
I cannot believe you are crying racism. That is rich.

As I said, you’re so siloed you don’t even know what you don’t know. As much as I think NPR is centrist-right wing trash, you’d be a thousand times better informed if you listened or read them.

Good grief. You talk about being "siloed" when that is EXACTLY what you are.
And, your statement above is simply laughable.

Don't bother meeting reality. You claim "reality has a liberal bias."
When that "reality" denies facts and evidence because they are inconvenient to the narrative and ignores stories that don't meet with the approval of the liberal audience, I guess you are right. The reality is groups like NPR are choosing a "reality" that is not grounded in truth.

Do you have cites for your claim? I have one based on some reporting from earlier today: NPR journos were instructed to report an HRC lie for every time Trump lied. When they were asked how to handle if one candidate didn't lie as much as the other, they were met with silence.

I think Berliner did a fine job of citing the claims.
Like ignoring the Hunter laptop story. And, we know they did this intentionally.

Remember this?



And, Berliner tells how one editor was happy they didn't cover it because "it could help Trump."

And it ended up being disinformation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, NPR cannot tolerate any dissent from the liberal narrative.
#DefundNPR

5 Days without pay. He’ll be okay.

Tyrannical though, right. See things our way, or we'll bring the hammer down on you.

Sooooo "Democratic"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]

Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.

You clearly did not read his piece if this is your take away.

No, I read it alright. He’s working the refs and he doesn’t live in reality. For example, as another PP pointed out, the Trump campaign really did work with Russia. When the far right claimed “lab leak!” they did so without any evidence and from a place of not only racism, but a place that then vacated their agency to act responsibly in regards to preventing infection. Kind of like someone who sleeps around without protection and without getting tested.

And you’re so siloed that you don’t understand any of this because you don’t consume NPR, you consume OAN and Fox. Your only brush with NPR - which, BTW, has tilted as far right as every other allegedly “neutral” outlet - is this article and the podcast with Bari Weiss and the right wing’s obsessive hatred of public media. So forgive the rest of us for disagreeing with one nutjob right winger’s take.

Uri Berliner is NOT right wing. At all. You bet he is.

The whole Russian collusion story was a hoax started by the DNC and Hillary Clinton. That, my dear, is fact. No, my darling, it is not.

And, the claim of the lab leak was based on SCIENCE. The fact that no bats were within flying distance of the wet market was one piece of science. Then, there was the video of the lab worker that was censored by China. It wasn’t based on science, at least not at the time. You don’t seem to understand that wet markets bring in animals from a pretty wide area, that people actually do travel. It was an argument grounded solely in the GOP’s hatred of Asian people.
I cannot believe you are crying racism. That is rich.

As I said, you’re so siloed you don’t even know what you don’t know. As much as I think NPR is centrist-right wing trash, you’d be a thousand times better informed if you listened or read them.

Good grief. You talk about being "siloed" when that is EXACTLY what you are.
And, your statement above is simply laughable.

Don't bother meeting reality. You claim "reality has a liberal bias."
When that "reality" denies facts and evidence because they are inconvenient to the narrative and ignores stories that don't meet with the approval of the liberal audience, I guess you are right. The reality is groups like NPR are choosing a "reality" that is not grounded in truth.

Do you have cites for your claim? I have one based on some reporting from earlier today: NPR journos were instructed to report an HRC lie for every time Trump lied. When they were asked how to handle if one candidate didn't lie as much as the other, they were met with silence.

Now this is an actual good example of the uneven reporting that advantages Republicans over Democrats and sleazy Republicans have nothing to say about it.

[Anonymous]

Principled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Principled.

Not remotely principled. Looking for $$$ at a right wing outlet, and he’ll get it. They love a “reformed liberal” in the right wing propaganda industry.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Principled.

Not remotely principled. Looking for $$$ at a right wing outlet, and he’ll get it. They love a “reformed liberal” in the right wing propaganda industry.

Keep pushing people away from your party. That should work out well for you.

[Anonymous]

I wouldn't want to work for her either. Cannot blame Berliner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Principled.

Not remotely principled. Looking for $$$ at a right wing outlet, and he’ll get it. They love a “reformed liberal” in the right wing propaganda industry.

Keep pushing people away from your party. That should work out well for you.

Doesn’t seem to be working out well for the GOP but you guys keep pushing people out of your party.

[Anonymous]

This is the new CEO of NPR because Uri Berliner dared to speak up about bias. Now you know where "truth"stands.

[Anonymous]

It’s long past time for federal support for NPR and PBS to be zeroed out and the whole thing needs to be privatized. Maybe there are lefty deep pockets willing to support what remains.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s long past time for federal support for NPR and PBS to be zeroed out and the whole thing needs to be privatized. Maybe there are lefty deep pockets willing to support what remains.

ITA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is the new CEO of NPR because Uri Berliner dared to speak up about bias. Now you know where "truth"stands.

What... I don't want common ground with liars.

[Anonymous]