This is wrong: 1. Taxpayer money is not used to purchase bonds; it is done through money creation. 2. The bonds will be repaid. What makes you think that they will not? The only way they could not be repaid is if the US went into default, which is extremely unlikely. How do I know? If it were likely, you wouldn't have government bonds paying one percent or less - the Fed is not the only buyer. |
Purchased this past summer for $550k. Put down 25% so mortgage is about $410k and payment is $2415. HHI is ~$165k. Could we have purchased more house, sure. But when you really put all the numbers down on paper, it doesn't look like a good idea. |
why is that? you would rather have a house worth $550K appreciate at 3% annually instead of a house worth $850K? |
I'm a poster upthread who said we wouldn't be comfortable with a mortgage of more than 1.5 - 2 times gross. Here's the thing. When my salary was puny, we bought the house to go with it. When it went up, we upsized. That's been consistently true no matter where we lived and whether the home was our first home (purchased for $135,000) or our current one (purchased for $2 million). Some of us are not willing to spend more than that on a house, period. If you have that view, then you buy where and what you can based on what you earn. If you want to borrow more than that, go right ahead, but no matter what I made I wouldn't be in line behind you to do it, too. |
Not PP, but if you have to go into debt because you overbought and can't cover your expenses, you'll be negating all that appreciation, and then some. You can also invest the money you're saving on your mortgage in other ways. It's called diversifying. |
Where in the hell are you coming up with these numbers? How is it reasonable for a couple with a HHI of $165K to purchase a home with a mortgage that high? Sure, it would be nice to own a home that is valued at that, but if you are just buying and it hasn't appreciated... Now, if they have a HUGE downpayment and feel comfortable with the monthly payments that would also allow them to save for retirement, college, etc, etc - sure, go ahead and buy the $850K home. But 20% down on that purchase price is $170K, which, which then takes you down to $680K for your 30-year mortgage. I don't even want to thing about that payment., and especially not on a salary of $165K. I'm not even this PP - but I totally understood where she was going. You do NOT want to be house poor with everything else we are all asked to save money for by ourselves these days while the cost of everything else in life increases, too! |
I don't think this debate applies to those buying $2MM houses. i.e., if your income is $800K then duh, the ratios do not apply. |
what are all of these expenses? we are talking about people who qualify for these loans because they have little other debt, other than their mtg payment. not necessarily the poster above, but those making $250K but only buying $500K houses .... |
-Private school tuition for 1 (thank God we can afford it as our child would have been miserable at our "top" public school-definitely wouldn't have been able to afford this if we had a $1M mortgage) -$600 car payment for a nice, but not fancy, car that hopefully we'll have for a long time -about $600/month for occupational therapy Other than the above, our expenses are probably pretty typical (and our college and retirement savings are average or above-average) for a family with our income. |
My point was I used the same ratio when I bought a house for $135,00 as I did when I bought a house for $2 million. The exact same one. So, tell, me, does the ratio apply only when you make substantially less than $200K or substantially more than $500K? And those of you between $200K and $500K need a different set of rules? |
try to stay with me, ok? Bill Gates is not going to buy a $4B house. |
FAIL, if you have an excellent public school you are throwing money away. |
I'm trying to picture a home even worth that much. How much are the historic castles in Great Britain worth? Is there any building in the world with that price tag? That shit better be as big as the entire state of Rhode Island or something.... |
PP here - 1. You are technically correct. But printing money is still money we don't have and taxpayers are on the hook because, 2. The Fed is buying Mortgage Backed Securities - bad mortgages in unkown quantitiy. The Fed's buying power works at the margins to keep rates low - it doesn't have to be the only buyer and of course it's not. Believe in 3% money forever if you wish. |
Thanks PP. Well said. It's amazing the ignorance that abounds on these issues. |