Jennifer Flowers may sit in the front row

[Anonymous]

In response to Mark Cuban placed in the front row, Trump is considering put Gennifer Flowers next to him in the debate.

Is this a good idea especially for attracting swing voters? I don't want to see Hillary collapse again.

[Anonymous]

I doubt she would care. It's been decades.

I can't say I care, either. Sorry.

Calling Mark Cuban dopey is funny, though. There are plenty of names to call him, but dopey isn't high on that list.

[Anonymous]

I think he was joking, but that sort of juvenile move is typical Trump. In any case, Hillary wouldn't give a damn.

[Anonymous]

It's GENNIFER. GENNIFER with a G whose only claim to infamy is an affair with a married man. Hillary, however, has been elected to US Senate in New York twice, US Secretary of State--a life with purpose. Why would, or should, she give a nano thought to "GENNIFER with a G" ? Only Donald gives a damn about sluts as he married two.

[Anonymous]

Personal attacks on two innocent women. Nice job you raging sexist

[Anonymous]

Trump's response/tweet is hilarious.

If Clinton is going to play games by putting Mark Cuban in a front seat, Trump has the right to do the same.

I love that Trump always responds in kind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump's response/tweet is hilarious.

If Clinton is going to play games by putting Mark Cuban in a front seat, Trump has the right to do the same.

I love that Trump always responds in kind.

As the leader of the most powerful country on the planet, is it better to shrug it off or retaliate in kind? As the leader of the United States, you're already operating from a position of strength.

[Anonymous]

Who is Jennifer Flowers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who is Jennifer Flowers?

I don't know. Gennifer Flowerss was a paramour of Bill Clinton's in the 80s or 90s. Or maybe the 70s? And Hillary Clinton was mean to her, way back when.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump's response/tweet is hilarious.

If Clinton is going to play games by putting Mark Cuban in a front seat, Trump has the right to do the same.

I love that Trump always responds in kind.

Yeah, he'll show her!

[Anonymous]

This again shows how unpresidential Trump is. I think it might not bother Clinton, but might distract Trump even more during the debate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's GENNIFER. GENNIFER with a G whose only claim to infamy is an affair with a married man. Hillary, however, has been elected to US Senate in New York twice, US Secretary of State--a life with purpose. Why would, or should, she give a nano thought to "GENNIFER with a G" ? Only Donald gives a damn about sluts as he married two.

Where is our "everyone is a misogynist" when we need it. There are many ways to sleep your way to the top. Trumps wives did it one way, and Hillary did it another way. Without Bill Clinton she would be retired "of counsel" to a law firm in Winnetka.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's GENNIFER. GENNIFER with a G whose only claim to infamy is an affair with a married man. Hillary, however, has been elected to US Senate in New York twice, US Secretary of State--a life with purpose. Why would, or should, she give a nano thought to "GENNIFER with a G" ? Only Donald gives a damn about sluts as he married two.

Where is our "everyone is a misogynist" when we need it. There are many ways to sleep your way to the top. Trumps wives did it one way, and Hillary did it another way. Without Bill Clinton she would be retired "of counsel" to a law firm in Winnetka.

Sure, because she's just a woman doncha know.

[Anonymous]

Trump still thinks he's in a Twitter feud with Kim and Kanye. Not cut out for president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's response/tweet is hilarious.

If Clinton is going to play games by putting Mark Cuban in a front seat, Trump has the right to do the same.

I love that Trump always responds in kind.

As the leader of the most powerful country on the planet, is it better to shrug it off or retaliate in kind? As the leader of the United States, you're already operating from a position of strength.

As the leader of the free world is it right to try to taunt your opponents by bringing Mark Cuban to the debate?