
From "men's rights activists" to saner Joes, I often see men sincerely confused about why so-called "bad boys" get a lot of female attention while their shlubbier counterparts do not. So, as my good deed for the day, I am reposting a useful exchange from another thread here where more men are like to see it and be helped:
Wanna score the hot girl of your dreams? Spend less time complaining online to other male virgins. Put the bacon cheeseburger down, report to the gym, and either shave off that tonsure or invest in some Rogaine, Men's Hair Club, or something. Being an asshole on top of your physical defects is not the answer. Good luck! |
So, you're saying that women will, by and large, choose to have sex with (not settle down with -- that's a different discussion) a good looking, nice guy over a similarly good looking, bad boy?
I don't think that's accurate. There's something about the bad attitude that (many) women seem to find attractive -- even where physical appearance is equivalent. |
Listen, you are getting ahead of yourself. Are you good looking? Are you really sure about that? Your mother's opinion doesn't count. If you are truly good looking and are still struggling enough to be bitter about who the local "bad boy" is getting, then there is something very wrong with you. Might I suggest adopting a less poisonous, condescending attitude towards women? |
YES! I love this OP! |
You're giving amazing advice but I doubt that men will listen. See, it's easier for them to argue with women online than actually put down that cheeseburger and admit they need to do some work.
So... Pointless arguing it is! |
It depends on the woman. |
If only we could bottle whatever it is that makes most average to ugly men think they're far more attractive than they are. I'd call it "Delusion." |
I love you. |
Nope, you just need money ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Another day in DCUM, another day where bored women with nothing better to do and wasting time at their jobs decide to bash men in a forum..who are probably in their offices working being productive. (bored woman typing response to meaningless forum). |
This! +1 A hot, nice, confident, interesting, etc guy is better than an asshole.... I'd say, for me, boring is the worst! Nice and boring and attractive is still not getting me in bed or in an LTR. |
It goes both ways. ![]() |
I don't know. I've seen friends opt for the bad guy over a great "good guy". They've all had some self esteem issues and I think that played a lot into it.
I'm also an outlier to what you're saying. I was dating the "hot bad guy" for years but there was always something Gholding me back aboUt wanting to marry him. We broke up and shortly after I met dh. Dh is an 8 while my ex was a 10. Dh is an adorable geek and no one would ever say he was a bad boy. And yet I'd choose him 100000 times over my ex. |
What are you on about? I don't see how any part of your response rebuts OP's point that ugly, bitter men need to look to their gremlin-like appearance for the cause of their dating woes and not make up narratives about being "too nice." |
Dumb dumb, this feeds right into the point in the OP. A fabulously wealthy man who can sweep a woman off her feet has something to offer, just as a good looking man does visually. Preferring men who actually come with more than bald spots spreading as wide as their guts does not mean that women want assholes. It means that women actually want some value in return for their time. You know, the way men do? Or are you beating down the doors of broke Roseanne Barr lookalikes? |