Mueller to Question Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump should decline. ANY president can hire and fire at will with no explanation needed.

That's the way it works (has worked, does work and will work) and new precedents should not be set because dems want to play gotcha.

+1

Harvard law professor Dershowitz clearly explained on several occasions the president can’t obstruct justice.

What happened to the Russia counter intelligence investigation that spawned the Mueller probe? It is increasingly apparent Mueller is the fruit of a poisonous tree. He needs to wrap it up before further embarrassing himself.

OMG. Dershowitz dude is back. Dershowitz has not been credible on anything, at all since the OJ trial. And has now hit Rock bottom as a Jeffery Epstein apologist/ Faux News talking head. Turn off Fox News and ask a real lawyer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Word on the street is that Comey recorded meetings and phone calls with Trump. So there's tapes of DJT blatantly trying to obstruct justice.

It's looking more likely that Mueller is going for an obstruction case in the near term. He's holding back on the actual Russia stuff.

Wow, if that’s true that’s a big deal.

Trump’s shady team of legal advisors are going to be working overtime to keep Trump away from Mueller.

It’s time for Trump to hire some real lawyers. His team of sideshow acts vs Mueller almost make me feel a little bad for him.

Almost.

And only a little bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If there are tapes of Trump obstructing justice and committing other crimes, he'd be already under arrest. They would have no need to question him.

The reason they want to question him is to 'Flynn' him.

Wait. You don’t understand the legal system do you? Or the Constitution?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The obstruction angle begins to make a lot more sense from Mueller's point of view. Let's say he presents an airtight obstruction case against the PoTUS. He will then be able to observe the reaction by the GOP.

Who does what?
Do members try to make moves to cover their tracks and in the process commit more crimes?
Who is actually trustworthy as a witness, vs. who is loyal to Trump?

I think he purposely holds back on Russia in the near term. If the GOP is serious about rule of law, they will begin impeachment proceedings. If not, Mueller then comes down with the big hammers - treason, money laundering, cyber crimes, campaign finance violations, etc to a wide variety of those in Trump's inner circle and Congress.

Remember John Gotti, who headed the Gambino crime family, who was famously known as the "Teflon Don" because every other prosecutor, every other law enforcement agency simply could not get enough on him, simply could not make any charge stick?

Well, it was Bob Mueller who nailed Gotti. And, it wasn't just small potatoes minor charges. He had Gotti put away for life. He worked his way deep into Gotti's inner circle, and turned guys like Sammy "The Bull" Gravano to take Gotti down.

This ain't Mueller's first dance, he's been doing this for a very long time and is very good at what he does. And guys like Sessions and Nunes and Trump are rank amateurs, or perhaps more accurately, circus sideshow clowns where it comes to dealing with Mueller.

+1. Say it all together now. Enron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump should decline. ANY president can hire and fire at will with no explanation needed.

That's the way it works (has worked, does work and will work) and new precedents should not be set because dems want to play gotcha.

+1

Harvard law professor Dershowitz clearly explained on several occasions the president can’t obstruct justice.

What happened to the Russia counter intelligence investigation that spawned the Mueller probe? It is increasingly apparent Mueller is the fruit of a poisonous tree. He needs to wrap it up before further embarrassing himself.

Google Dershowitz and Trump and Jeff Eptsein to understand why this is a flim flam.

Ten points for casual use of "flim flam." That’s a funny word that should be used more often. NP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump should decline. ANY president can hire and fire at will with no explanation needed.

That's the way it works (has worked, does work and will work) and new precedents should not be set because dems want to play gotcha.

+1

Harvard law professor Dershowitz clearly explained on several occasions the president can’t obstruct justice.

What happened to the Russia counter intelligence investigation that spawned the Mueller probe? It is increasingly apparent Mueller is the fruit of a poisonous tree. He needs to wrap it up before further embarrassing himself.

Google Dershowitz and Trump and Jeff Eptsein to understand why this is a flim flam.

Ten points for casual use of "flim flam." That’s a funny word that should be used more often. NP

+1. Agree. Very old school, but on point.

[Anonymous]

Stories circulating that Mueller is ready to file superceding indictments against Manafort and Gates but is holding off to allow for negotiation of plea agreements.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stories circulating that Mueller is ready to file superceding indictments against Manafort and Gates but is holding off to allow for negotiation of plea agreements.

Gates turning on Manafort may push Manafort to turn on Trump. Gates will have enough to make sure Manafort never sees the light of day (and he doesn't deserve it)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Stories circulating that Mueller is ready to file superceding indictments against Manafort and Gates but is holding off to allow for negotiation of plea agreements.

Apparently correct stories.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/370424-gates-new-attorney-seen-meeting-with-mueller-report

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stories circulating that Mueller is ready to file superceding indictments against Manafort and Gates but is holding off to allow for negotiation of plea agreements.

Apparently correct stories.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/370424-gates-new-attorney-seen-meeting-with-mueller-report

Wow. All these clowns are going to go bankrupt defending themselves from Mueller and his band of super-lawyers. It's enough to make anyone flip.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stories circulating that Mueller is ready to file superceding indictments against Manafort and Gates but is holding off to allow for negotiation of plea agreements.

Apparently correct stories.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/370424-gates-new-attorney-seen-meeting-with-mueller-report

Wow. All these clowns are going to go bankrupt defending themselves from Mueller and his band of super-lawyers. It's enough to make anyone flip.

+1. I am enjoying the thought of someone billing out at $500 an hour to chat with Mueller.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stories circulating that Mueller is ready to file superceding indictments against Manafort and Gates but is holding off to allow for negotiation of plea agreements.

Apparently correct stories.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/370424-gates-new-attorney-seen-meeting-with-mueller-report

Wow. All these clowns are going to go bankrupt defending themselves from Mueller and his band of super-lawyers. It's enough to make anyone flip.

+1. I am enjoying the thought of someone billing out at $500 an hour to chat with Mueller.

More in the neighborhood of $1000.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If there are tapes of Trump obstructing justice and committing other crimes, he'd be already under arrest. They would have no need to question him.

The reason they want to question him is to 'Flynn' him.

Wait. You don’t understand the legal system do you? Or the Constitution?

The person you're responding to has gotten a great legal education from watching NCIS and believes that all investigations and trials are wrapped up in 44 minutes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Stories circulating that Mueller is ready to file superceding indictments against Manafort and Gates but is holding off to allow for negotiation of plea agreements.

Apparently correct stories.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/370424-gates-new-attorney-seen-meeting-with-mueller-report

Wow. All these clowns are going to go bankrupt defending themselves from Mueller and his band of super-lawyers. It's enough to make anyone flip.

They are already bankrupt. Any wealth they have was illegally obtained and will likely be forfieted. They have screwed their families and their lives with their professional pursuits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump should decline. ANY president can hire and fire at will with no explanation needed.

That's the way it works (has worked, does work and will work) and new precedents should not be set because dems want to play gotcha.

Hahaha. I’m sure Mueller feels the same way. One difference: Mueller actually understands the law. BTW Mueller is a Republican and most of the FBI are VERY conservative.

No, I understand the law. ANY president can hire and fire at will with no explanation needed, period, end of sentence, end of argument, bitch.

You got mad ?