Loretta Lynch scrubbing Orlando 911 tapes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems releasing his ranting shirt glorifies his insane world view. Why would you do that?

Exactly.

I can never figure out why people always want us to react exactly as terrorists want.

So what you are saying is if you don't react, they will simply stop? These are not 3 year old children having a temper tantrum. These are murderous religious nuts who are fed by their own religious ideals. They will now stop because you say "go in peace" or simply ignore them.

No. I'm saying that broadcasting terrorists message is broadcasting the terrorist's message. You understand that was the reason he wanted it recorded, right?

Again, his goal was accomplished. 49 infidels dead. Do you think that hasn't already been broadcast? You act as if Lynch will be releasing some hidden finding.

Lynch and Obama are editing the recording for political purposes only. They do not want Americans further incensed - it will expose their lies and bring more individuals to conservative values.

If you already know what's on the tapes, why do you need to hear it? Mass hysteria was and IS the terrorist's objective.

[Anonymous]

Could it be that hearing his message would cause more people to support Trump, who is clearly more anti-terrorism than Clinton?
This administration can’t risk that!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Could it be that hearing his message would cause more people to support Trump, who is clearly more anti-terrorism than Clinton?
This administration can’t risk that!

Disagreements about policy, thinking that Obama and Clinton are not doing what you think they should be doing, does not make them pro-terrorist.

[Anonymous]

I don't need to hear that radical Islamic terrorist. Nor should we allow the ISIS sympathizers anywhere in the world to copycat or experience their sick pleasure by listening ti it. When our own President leaves out the carnage and destruction of the Tsarnov brothers BOMB he left out one of the big 3 Islamic terrorist attacks on US soil in the last few years:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/06/16/remarks-president-statement-press

Several issues- hamstringing law enforcement with PC, no fly, clearances, anyone buying assault weapons, monitoring/reporting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Could it be that hearing his message would cause more people to support Trump, who is clearly more anti-terrorism than Clinton?
This administration can’t risk that!

Disagreements about policy, thinking that Obama and Clinton are not doing what you think they should be doing, does not make them pro-terrorist.

I did not say either were pro-terrorist. This administration doesn’t seem to have the will to really deal with these monsters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Could it be that hearing his message would cause more people to support Trump, who is clearly more anti-terrorism than Clinton?
This administration can’t risk that!

Disagreements about policy, thinking that Obama and Clinton are not doing what you think they should be doing, does not make them pro-terrorist.

I did not say either were pro-terrorist. This administration doesn’t seem to have the will to really deal with these monsters.

Horseshit. This administration has killed more terrorists than the last one. They just weren't getting on television for chest-thumping press conferences about all those drone strikes.

This was an American citizen who legally bought an assault weapon and mowed down scores of innocent people. THAT'S something that will happen again and again and again because of a recalcitrant Congress doesn't seem to have the will to really deal with a deadly public health crisis. An entirely AMERICAN public health crisis.

[Anonymous]

Yes I cannot believe the 911 tapes haven't been released yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Breitbart has you tinfoil types eating out of their hand.

You're kidding right? May as well link the national enquirer...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems releasing his ranting shirt glorifies his insane world view. Why would you do that?

Exactly.

I can never figure out why people always want us to react exactly as terrorists want.

So what you are saying is if you don't react, they will simply stop? These are not 3 year old children having a temper tantrum. These are murderous religious nuts who are fed by their own religious ideals. They will now stop because you say "go in peace" or simply ignore them.

No. I'm saying that broadcasting terrorists message is broadcasting the terrorist's message. You understand that was the reason he wanted it recorded, right?

Again, his goal was accomplished. 49 infidels dead. Do you think that hasn't already been broadcast? You act as if Lynch will be releasing some hidden finding.

Lynch and Obama are editing the recording for political purposes only. They do not want Americans further incensed - it will expose their lies and bring more individuals to conservative values.

If you already know what's on the tapes, why do you need to hear it? Mass hysteria was and IS the terrorist's objective.

Because Lynch is calling it a hate crime, while at the same time saying the killer said nothing about the victims being gay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She shouldn't be doing that. But we haven't shown ourselves to be very rational, as a country, lately. Maybe when we're all able to act like adults, she'll release the unedited tapes.

So let's look at this. I'm a Jew. I say never again. And mean it. But people have 'never again' a bit mixed up. Back during rise of the Nazis, there wasn't a group of radical Jews mixing amongst peaceful Jews, killing everyone in their path in the name of Judaism and God. There weren't Jews who were outright saying they wanted to kill us - and have done it over and over again to prove their point. We KNOW this isn't all Muslims. We DO know this is SOME Muslims. So it stands to reason, Mosques should get greater scrutiny, given we have seen some of Imams share the same views as the attackers (see video of Imam at Orlando mosque saying killing gays is doing them a favor). It stands to reason we would want to slow down or stop the bringing in of refugees until we can screen them properly, not half-assed. And for God's sakes, work with the churches in Syria to bring in Christian Syrians who are being persecuted by ISIS. I dare say the priests there know their parishioners and have for a very long time. Europe is a very good lesson as to why it makes no sense to wantonly bring people in. Our own CIA and FBI have warned they cannot properly vet.

We know who our enemy is - Radical Islam. They are screaming it from the rooftops. It's time we listen and do it right.

PP here. I think you are both over and underestimating Islam and Muslims. But I was referring to Ebola, Zika, and other recent episodes of mass hysteria in this country. We're not rational people, in general.

I disagree with many of your points, but you sound reasonable. Many people lately simply sound hysterical.

They have a right to be frightened, given our government is not taking this threat seriously, and are, in fact, protecting those individuals who have said they want to kill us. 49 people are dead in Orlando as a result of nothing more than political correctness - our best and brightest being hamstrung by an ideologue with a bone to pick with America. Those people died in vain because so many people have not learned.

People aren't 'hysterical' due to the diseases, et al. They are 'hysterical' because they know we have a government so corrupt, they have lost the desire to protect their own people.

So never again if Jews are involved, but if Muslims are the target, feel free to target all Muslims to reach the extremists. Ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bush didn't release the 9/11 blackbox recordings of the hijackers. Where was your outrage then?

Different. He didn't release them.
She is releasing them, but edited. As I asked before, then what is the purpose? To confuse, distort, emotionally charge the event, which is latest highly emotional. It's all political.

Don't worry, dems will sniff this, change "the narrative" tomorrow and turn this against republicans, again. Their playbook every time. When it happens, at least you'll know what to look for.

Wasn't Bush covering up their screams of allahu Akbar, keeping the truth from us? It's a conspiracy.

They all suck! This is why I'm voting for Trump, sick of all these scheming career politicians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In addition to my "never again" post above:

Johnnie Moore, author of the good "Delaying ISIS", and Glenn Beck's Nazarene Fund teamed up around Christmastime to rescue Christians from Syria. They did it under a shroud of secrecy. vetted each one with the help of the churches and a team of security experts, and settled the groups into small European countries. These people were accepted into the communities and the churches. Not one of those countries have had a terrorist attack.

Seems to me we already have a model to follow.

http://www.christianpost.com/news/glenn-beck-johnnie-moore-evacuate-iraqi-christian-refugee-slovakia-152273/

Glenn Beck as model for anything = Jumping the Shark in the extreme.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So she gets to decide what we can handle?

Wow, democrats really.do infantilize the citizenry.

'Muricans can't behave themselves

Or more accurately, the terrorists can't behave themselves. They really overreact to lots of things (cartoons, videos, etc.).

as a 'moderate Muslim"- totally agree. its not just the terrosists, its the community son marginalized and extreme Muslims who freak out and and take to the streets looting and burning every single time someone says something offensive who give crazy terrorists the mental boost to go out and commit murderous acts. I mean I think that the Charlie head and Danish cartoons are disgusting but I know they will offend me and I prefer to not look at them & completely ignore them. How is rioting or bombing Charlie Hebdo and killing people helping to establish a good reputation for Muhammad saw? Its totally doing the opposite. People in the world should refrain from criticizing our leaders b/c they respect them not because they are afraid that Muslims are thugs & murderers.
I think they scrub the tapes b/c they don't want ISIS to feel like their strategy of claiming random attacks by lone wolves is working. Ideally ISIS should feel like the despised and filthy outcast from all human society and especially Muslims society. That is why it is prudent to frame the narrative of lone wold shooters who grab hold of whatever violent narrative is at hand to justify their acts of murder as just that and not support for ISIS. ISIS needs to feel demoralized cornered and near annihilation - that way potential recruits will think they are losers, no-one wants to fight for losers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In addition to my "never again" post above:

Johnnie Moore, author of the good "Delaying ISIS", and Glenn Beck's Nazarene Fund teamed up around Christmastime to rescue Christians from Syria. They did it under a shroud of secrecy. vetted each one with the help of the churches and a team of security experts, and settled the groups into small European countries. These people were accepted into the communities and the churches. Not one of those countries have had a terrorist attack.

Seems to me we already have a model to follow.

http://www.christianpost.com/news/glenn-beck-johnnie-moore-evacuate-iraqi-christian-refugee-slovakia-152273/

Glenn Beck as model for anything = Jumping the Shark in the extreme.

And yet, it worked. See what happens when you demonize a man?

[Anonymous]

Big liberal dem here, this is a mistake (best possible interpretation). They need to either release the unedited audio, and/or unedited transcripts, or release nothing at all. Appearing to (or actually) tampering with the tapes just feeds into their critics' conspiracy theories.