Kristen Stewart’s new newest look

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s not straight girl hot; she’s lesbian hot. Middle-aged suburban moms married to Brads and Chads on DCUM are not the right audience for this look or for her way of wearing it.

Yeah, and she doesn't GAF about it either.

[Anonymous]

Don't really care what she wears, but she should not be treating her staff that way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is that look? She is flat as a pancake, terrible hairstyle, basically no game at all.

To flaunt something like this you need some curves and innate sexiness, she lacks both massively.

Are you the moron who already posted Kristen Stewart is "flat as a pancake"? And in the same breath sang the praises of the Kardashians?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the way she claps at the body guard to hurry up and open the door for her.

That’s what I noticed too! Wouldn’t surprise me if she said, “Chop chop!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/26793504/nicole-kidman-bra-sultry-photoshoot-elle/

Nicole Kidman is thirsty too: posing in black lingerie.

Are they competing for a role?

Nicole is doing an editorial shoot for a fashion magazine in a professional studio. Kristen is in the street. Big difference

But Kristen has been walking around in lingerie in public in recent weeks—cat walking down the street while being photographed, hopping into buildings and limos.

I bet we will see these pics in an ad campaign for something.

Or it’s just a desperate attempt for publicity…which is working.

She hasn’t worked in a while.

Are you talking about Kristen, because what? She’s got a huge movie out right now that critics love. This is a publicity tour.

What movie?

Love Lies Bleeding. Have you heard of google?

Well this looks like something I will absolutely be avoiding. Is it a parody?
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/26793504/nicole-kidman-bra-sultry-photoshoot-elle/

Nicole Kidman is thirsty too: posing in black lingerie.

Are they competing for a role?

Nicole is doing an editorial shoot for a fashion magazine in a professional studio. Kristen is in the street. Big difference

But Kristen has been walking around in lingerie in public in recent weeks—cat walking down the street while being photographed, hopping into buildings and limos.

I bet we will see these pics in an ad campaign for something.

Or it’s just a desperate attempt for publicity…which is working.

She hasn’t worked in a while.

Are you talking about Kristen, because what? She’s got a huge movie out right now that critics love. This is a publicity tour.

What movie?

Love Lies Bleeding. Have you heard of google?

Well this looks like something I will absolutely be avoiding. Is it a parody?
DP

I watched the trailer specifically because of this comment. It does not even slightly seem like a parody. It has a 92% on rotten tomatoes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s not straight girl hot; she’s lesbian hot. Middle-aged suburban moms married to Brads and Chads on DCUM are not the right audience for this look or for her way of wearing it.

Exactly! Someone gets it.

[Anonymous]

She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity.

She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off.

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is not a fashion icon on any level. And not even a good actress. Hard to understand her being an A lister ...

ITA and will add - she's not as attractive/edgy/hip (insert your own adjective here) as she thinks she is.

That is such an accurate statement. I've never understood her fame.

I can explain her fame:

She was super lucky to be cast as the “lead” in the 5 part film Twilight franchise where she barely had to act. All she had to do was look like a sullen teen alongside the beefcake vampires.

The reality is fans flocked to the theater to see the boys…not her.

Then she did some other movies that the majority of the world never watched.

She can’t open or carry a movie…because she can’t act and isn’t pretty or interesting enough.

So she’s walking around in lingerie to get some attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the way she claps at the body guard to hurry up and open the door for her.

+1. How gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/26793504/nicole-kidman-bra-sultry-photoshoot-elle/

Nicole Kidman is thirsty too: posing in black lingerie.

Are they competing for a role?

Nicole is doing an editorial shoot for a fashion magazine in a professional studio. Kristen is in the street. Big difference

But Kristen has been walking around in lingerie in public in recent weeks—cat walking down the street while being photographed, hopping into buildings and limos.

I bet we will see these pics in an ad campaign for something.

Or it’s just a desperate attempt for publicity…which is working.

She hasn’t worked in a while.

Are you talking about Kristen, because what? She’s got a huge movie out right now that critics love. This is a publicity tour.

What movie?

Love Lies Bleeding. Have you heard of google?

Well this looks like something I will absolutely be avoiding. Is it a parody?
DP

Dark comedy like Heathers.

Few people get that type of art.

[Anonymous]

She never claps her hands.

She’s showing him she can’t walk on cobblestones with heals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is not a fashion icon on any level. And not even a good actress. Hard to understand her being an A lister ...

+100