Kristen Stewart’s new newest look

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity.

She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off.

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

NP. Your little takedown? Was that supposed to be “the heat?” Aww. Bless your heart.

No, the “Heat” is people not seeing her movies. It’s already happening and is bound to get worse. She ruins every film she is part of with her bad acting. We’ve figured that out, so if a casting agent is going to disrespect us, the audience, by casting her, we won’t go to the film.

Hollywood types don’t seem to get it. We’re sick of you casting your lame, untalented kids. We’re sick of them writing the scripts. Hire top people, not your friends’ children. Stop or cannibalise the industry completely. The audience are fine with you and your nepotistic crap.

Sure. That’s why her latest film gets an 85% positivity rate among viewers on Rotten Tomatoes. 93% among critics. But sure, no one likes her films.

First off, fewer people are seeing films than before and Hollywood is really struggling. Practically no one can get financing anymore. Secondly, people might like a film that has Kristen Stewart, but it’s despite of her. For god’s sake: SHE CANNOT ACT!!!!!!!!

I don't understand how anyone could possibly feel this strongly about a woman who has mostly been in indie movies for the last decade. WTF is she doing to you? You seem livid at her very existence. And that, to me, frankly, screams some type of prejudice. A woman who clearly doesn't give a flying eff about what people think about her? A lesbian? A woman who went through a public scandal and had the audacity to not be forced into a basement with a scarlet A? Are you a Robert Pattinson fan? Because honestly the vitriol in this thread for a fairly under the radar actress is baffling. This is too much emotion to have about someone you don't know.

Seems like the appearance of arrogance and the possible self-indulgence on her part, might upset people.

I mean, to me that reads "seems like the fact that she likes herself upsets people". Because all she's really done is walk around new york during a press tour in provocative clothes and continue to act, both of which are things loads of other actors/actresses do without people seeming to like self implode in response.

No, she organized and paid for people to film and distribute a video of her tripping around in stilettos (and even here in DCUM). That’s what’s annoying, not that she walked around or whatever. Lots of actors and actresses live in NYC, no one chases after them unless they are invited and to do so.

What’s infuriating is the pathetic PR and the insulting of our intelligence. Why do people in the business think their audiences are so stupid? Have a little respect for us if you want us to watch your crap.

Are you saying that she asked them to follow her around??

Yes. Because she PAID them to be there and record her.

Are you stupid or just pretending to be?

I hate to break it to you but KS does not have to pay anyone to follow her around. You clearly hate her, but I strongly dislike Gwyneth Paltrow but have enough of a grasp on reality to understand she's a famous person who makes the photographers who photograph her money not the other way around. KS is kind of notoriously private and only shows up like this when promoting a project. And yes when promoting a project celebrities frequently walk around in large cities in FASHION to be photographed. That is a part of their literal job to be the face of the movie.

Yes, they because they are being paid to model clothes or because they or the PR people for their current are paying people to photograph them. I used to live in the same building as freaking Madonna in the height of her fame. There were no paparazzi ever. Why do you think that? I cannot imagine being so naive. Life must be very uncomplicated and yet confusing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity.

She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off.

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

NP. Your little takedown? Was that supposed to be “the heat?” Aww. Bless your heart.

No, the “Heat” is people not seeing her movies. It’s already happening and is bound to get worse. She ruins every film she is part of with her bad acting. We’ve figured that out, so if a casting agent is going to disrespect us, the audience, by casting her, we won’t go to the film.

Hollywood types don’t seem to get it. We’re sick of you casting your lame, untalented kids. We’re sick of them writing the scripts. Hire top people, not your friends’ children. Stop or cannibalise the industry completely. The audience are fine with you and your nepotistic crap.

Sure. That’s why her latest film gets an 85% positivity rate among viewers on Rotten Tomatoes. 93% among critics. But sure, no one likes her films.

First off, fewer people are seeing films than before and Hollywood is really struggling. Practically no one can get financing anymore. Secondly, people might like a film that has Kristen Stewart, but it’s despite of her. For god’s sake: SHE CANNOT ACT!!!!!!!!

Let’s turn to someone with more knowledge and credibility than you. From Manohla Dargis, one of the NYT film critics, on Stewart’s acting skills:

“Watching Kristen Stewart is always an adventure. A performer who makes good movies better and dreary movies tolerable, she has a restlessness that has made her one of the more interesting attractions in American film. She has a gift for making a character’s inner life transparently readable, and while she can be subtle and withholding, it is her fascinatingly unquiet presence that draws you in, an itchy intensity that can keep her (and you) on edge. Pauline Kael wrote that Jane Fonda’s “motor runs a little fast” — so does Stewart’s.”

You’re joking, right? Speaking of struggling finances, no one is worse off than journalists and newspapers. They have no circulation anymore and tons of competition with bloggers, etc. They’re casualties of the internet, unable to compete with changing times. AI will only make it worse in terms of bogus reviews.

Would I trust a critic in 1980? Sure, of course. But today, if you pay them a little, and I do mean, a little, they’ll publish anything you want them to say.

Kristen Stewart cannot act. I don’t care how much (or rather how little) she or whoever is trying to promote her paid Manhola Dargis to say otherwise. She cannot act!

You seem like a person who is deeply unhappy with your life. I hope you find peace. In the meantime, Kristen will continue to roll around in her millions and Manohla will continue to have her words read by thousands. And there’s nothing you can do about it, not if you protest until you’re blue in the face and spittle flies from your mouth.

The NYT and its film critics especially are completely irrelevant these days. They aren’t rolling around in money. Their entire industry had fallen apart over the last thirty years. I agree a few THOUSANDS might read Manohla, but not the MILLIONS who used to read Ebert. There’s nothing Manohla can do about it. That’s why she writes whatever some producer tells her to write.

As for KS, she got extremely lucky with Twilight, but her acting range is limited to sulking and looking constipated. Her career has stalled and she’s getting old. Meanwhile she’s gotten used to living the good life and wants to keep it up, but can’t. Like the whole movie industry, she is completely clueless about what the public wants.

Finally, instead of coming up with an intelligent comeback, you’ve made completely irrelevant and plainly wrong assumptions about a total stranger. How the hell do you know what my financial or personal situation is? The only thing I’m sad or miserable about is how incredibly crappy films have gotten, how easily bought critics are and what bad performers make it to the big screen. I used to love going to the movies and now I hate to because of bad actresses like KS. The industry is murdering itself. It’s painful to watch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is not a fashion icon on any level. And not even a good actress. Hard to understand her being an A lister ...

She’s not an A Lister. Damn near just a child/teen star who has remained famous.

She has as many paparazzi as Kidman. Also people screaming her name, just while walking to her car...She's A list. Not to mention she's a household name.

That is just manufactured fake PR. She is not an A-Lister. The average American has literally no idea who she is. She is just a dime a dozen aging actress who was in a super famous movie when she was a teenager (?) like 15 years ago. She has to dress like this for attention. She’s is thirsty and desperate. Not A-List.

I mean is the Home Alone actor A-List? He’s still super duper famous because of his roles as a child actor but he’s not A-List for anything recent. Neither is K Stewart.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is not a fashion icon on any level. And not even a good actress. Hard to understand her being an A lister ...

She’s not an A Lister. Damn near just a child/teen star who has remained famous.

She has as many paparazzi as Kidman. Also people screaming her name, just while walking to her car...She's A list. Not to mention she's a household name.

That is just manufactured fake PR. She is not an A-Lister. The average American has literally no idea who she is. She is just a dime a dozen aging actress who was in a super famous movie when she was a teenager (?) like 15 years ago. She has to dress like this for attention. She’s is thirsty and desperate. Not A-List.

I mean is the Home Alone actor A-List? He’s still super duper famous because of his roles as a child actor but he’s not A-List for anything recent. Neither is K Stewart.

Um yes I would say Macaulay Culkin is a-list. He doesn't really act anymore but he COULD, easily. And he could easily become famous again if he wanted to be. He is extraordinarily recognizeable. Being 'super duper famous' in fact means you are a-list.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity.

She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off.

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

NP. Your little takedown? Was that supposed to be “the heat?” Aww. Bless your heart.

No, the “Heat” is people not seeing her movies. It’s already happening and is bound to get worse. She ruins every film she is part of with her bad acting. We’ve figured that out, so if a casting agent is going to disrespect us, the audience, by casting her, we won’t go to the film.

Hollywood types don’t seem to get it. We’re sick of you casting your lame, untalented kids. We’re sick of them writing the scripts. Hire top people, not your friends’ children. Stop or cannibalise the industry completely. The audience are fine with you and your nepotistic crap.

Sure. That’s why her latest film gets an 85% positivity rate among viewers on Rotten Tomatoes. 93% among critics. But sure, no one likes her films.

First off, fewer people are seeing films than before and Hollywood is really struggling. Practically no one can get financing anymore. Secondly, people might like a film that has Kristen Stewart, but it’s despite of her. For god’s sake: SHE CANNOT ACT!!!!!!!!

I don't understand how anyone could possibly feel this strongly about a woman who has mostly been in indie movies for the last decade. WTF is she doing to you? You seem livid at her very existence. And that, to me, frankly, screams some type of prejudice. A woman who clearly doesn't give a flying eff about what people think about her? A lesbian? A woman who went through a public scandal and had the audacity to not be forced into a basement with a scarlet A? Are you a Robert Pattinson fan? Because honestly the vitriol in this thread for a fairly under the radar actress is baffling. This is too much emotion to have about someone you don't know.

Seems like the appearance of arrogance and the possible self-indulgence on her part, might upset people.

I mean, to me that reads "seems like the fact that she likes herself upsets people". Because all she's really done is walk around new york during a press tour in provocative clothes and continue to act, both of which are things loads of other actors/actresses do without people seeming to like self implode in response.

No, she organized and paid for people to film and distribute a video of her tripping around in stilettos (and even here in DCUM). That’s what’s annoying, not that she walked around or whatever. Lots of actors and actresses live in NYC, no one chases after them unless they are invited and to do so.

What’s infuriating is the pathetic PR and the insulting of our intelligence. Why do people in the business think their audiences are so stupid? Have a little respect for us if you want us to watch your crap.

Are you saying that she asked them to follow her around??

Yes. Because she PAID them to be there and record her.

Are you stupid or just pretending to be?

I hate to break it to you but KS does not have to pay anyone to follow her around. You clearly hate her, but I strongly dislike Gwyneth Paltrow but have enough of a grasp on reality to understand she's a famous person who makes the photographers who photograph her money not the other way around. KS is kind of notoriously private and only shows up like this when promoting a project. And yes when promoting a project celebrities frequently walk around in large cities in FASHION to be photographed. That is a part of their literal job to be the face of the movie.

Yes, they because they are being paid to model clothes or because they or the PR people for their current are paying people to photograph them. I used to live in the same building as freaking Madonna in the height of her fame. There were no paparazzi ever. Why do you think that? I cannot imagine being so naive. Life must be very uncomplicated and yet confusing.

Because she kept her address private and wasn't promoting anything? I have literally no idea what point you are making. KS is rarely photographed outside her house. I am like, agreeing with you kind of? SHE did not pay them to be there to get HERSELF publicity. She is PROMOTING A FILM and the ADVERTISING team behind that film is utilizing her presence in NYC wearing crazy clothes to draw attention to the film. Yes she likely IS coordinating with paparazzo on some of these, also some of the photographs are her walking in and out of interviews where photos are taken of all celebrities coming and going (ie, Colbert appearance).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did you see the video of her walking in public in panties and a top?

She’s clearly thirsty for press. When was the last time she worked?

Her haircut is awful, and she’s flat as a pancake.

I don’t get it. She’s not a sex symbol like a kardashian…lacks the beauty and curves.

And she’s not a great actress. She should find some small indie films to make. Maybe she can strike gold with a good script?

Or she should reboot twilight and just accept that she’s a one hit wonder…as long as she has hot guys around her.

But she isn't a bad actress either. She does a lot of indie films bc i think she wants people to forget about Twilight but she isn't the right kind of actress for indie films. She is still young though and eventually she will figure it out that she is meant for mainstream films.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity.

She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off.

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

NP. Your little takedown? Was that supposed to be “the heat?” Aww. Bless your heart.

No, the “Heat” is people not seeing her movies. It’s already happening and is bound to get worse. She ruins every film she is part of with her bad acting. We’ve figured that out, so if a casting agent is going to disrespect us, the audience, by casting her, we won’t go to the film.

Hollywood types don’t seem to get it. We’re sick of you casting your lame, untalented kids. We’re sick of them writing the scripts. Hire top people, not your friends’ children. Stop or cannibalise the industry completely. The audience are fine with you and your nepotistic crap.

Sure. That’s why her latest film gets an 85% positivity rate among viewers on Rotten Tomatoes. 93% among critics. But sure, no one likes her films.

First off, fewer people are seeing films than before and Hollywood is really struggling. Practically no one can get financing anymore. Secondly, people might like a film that has Kristen Stewart, but it’s despite of her. For god’s sake: SHE CANNOT ACT!!!!!!!!

Let’s turn to someone with more knowledge and credibility than you. From Manohla Dargis, one of the NYT film critics, on Stewart’s acting skills:

“Watching Kristen Stewart is always an adventure. A performer who makes good movies better and dreary movies tolerable, she has a restlessness that has made her one of the more interesting attractions in American film. She has a gift for making a character’s inner life transparently readable, and while she can be subtle and withholding, it is her fascinatingly unquiet presence that draws you in, an itchy intensity that can keep her (and you) on edge. Pauline Kael wrote that Jane Fonda’s “motor runs a little fast” — so does Stewart’s.”

You’re joking, right? Speaking of struggling finances, no one is worse off than journalists and newspapers. They have no circulation anymore and tons of competition with bloggers, etc. They’re casualties of the internet, unable to compete with changing times. AI will only make it worse in terms of bogus reviews.

Would I trust a critic in 1980? Sure, of course. But today, if you pay them a little, and I do mean, a little, they’ll publish anything you want them to say.

Kristen Stewart cannot act. I don’t care how much (or rather how little) she or whoever is trying to promote her paid Manhola Dargis to say otherwise. She cannot act!

You seem like a person who is deeply unhappy with your life. I hope you find peace. In the meantime, Kristen will continue to roll around in her millions and Manohla will continue to have her words read by thousands. And there’s nothing you can do about it, not if you protest until you’re blue in the face and spittle flies from your mouth.

The NYT and its film critics especially are completely irrelevant these days. They aren’t rolling around in money. Their entire industry had fallen apart over the last thirty years. I agree a few THOUSANDS might read Manohla, but not the MILLIONS who used to read Ebert. There’s nothing Manohla can do about it. That’s why she writes whatever some producer tells her to write.

As for KS, she got extremely lucky with Twilight, but her acting range is limited to sulking and looking constipated. Her career has stalled and she’s getting old. Meanwhile she’s gotten used to living the good life and wants to keep it up, but can’t. Like the whole movie industry, she is completely clueless about what the public wants.

Finally, instead of coming up with an intelligent comeback, you’ve made completely irrelevant and plainly wrong assumptions about a total stranger. How the hell do you know what my financial or personal situation is? The only thing I’m sad or miserable about is how incredibly crappy films have gotten, how easily bought critics are and what bad performers make it to the big screen. I used to love going to the movies and now I hate to because of bad actresses like KS. The industry is murdering itself. It’s painful to watch.

Mischa Barton anyone?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did you see the video of her walking in public in panties and a top?

She’s clearly thirsty for press. When was the last time she worked?

Her haircut is awful, and she’s flat as a pancake.

I don’t get it. She’s not a sex symbol like a kardashian…lacks the beauty and curves.

And she’s not a great actress. She should find some small indie films to make. Maybe she can strike gold with a good script?

Or she should reboot twilight and just accept that she’s a one hit wonder…as long as she has hot guys around her.

But she isn't a bad actress either. She does a lot of indie films bc i think she wants people to forget about Twilight but she isn't the right kind of actress for indie films. She is still young though and eventually she will figure it out that she is meant for mainstream films.

She’s in her mid 30s, so relatively young

[Anonymous]

This thread is probably one of the most amusing sad and pathetic I have ever read on dcum. Op you are the definition of loser.

[Anonymous]

If the only people who know you are aging millennials who know you from a trilogy you were in 15 years ago, you are not currently A-List. A-List is Leo,Matt Damon, Cruise, Emma Stone, Reese Witherspoon tier. Stewart is just a dime a dozen washed up child star; a middle aged actress who has to stoop to these antics for some attention. It’s sad, really.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the only people who know you are aging millennials who know you from a trilogy you were in 15 years ago, you are not currently A-List. A-List is Leo,Matt Damon, Cruise, Emma Stone, Reese Witherspoon tier. Stewart is just a dime a dozen washed up child star; a middle aged actress who has to stoop to these antics for some attention. It’s sad, really.

My 16 yr old DD thinks she's very, very cool.
Sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the only people who know you are aging millennials who know you from a trilogy you were in 15 years ago, you are not currently A-List. A-List is Leo,Matt Damon, Cruise, Emma Stone, Reese Witherspoon tier. Stewart is just a dime a dozen washed up child star; a middle aged actress who has to stoop to these antics for some attention. It’s sad, really.

she was the first American to win a Cesar award... Maybe you just not cultured when it comes to cinema. she's an indie darling

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If the only people who know you are aging millennials who know you from a trilogy you were in 15 years ago, you are not currently A-List. A-List is Leo,Matt Damon, Cruise, Emma Stone, Reese Witherspoon tier. Stewart is just a dime a dozen washed up child star; a middle aged actress who has to stoop to these antics for some attention. It’s sad, really.

Nobody in modern-day society considers 33 “middle aged. “

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the only people who know you are aging millennials who know you from a trilogy you were in 15 years ago, you are not currently A-List. A-List is Leo,Matt Damon, Cruise, Emma Stone, Reese Witherspoon tier. Stewart is just a dime a dozen washed up child star; a middle aged actress who has to stoop to these antics for some attention. It’s sad, really.

Nobody in modern-day society considers 33 “middle aged. “

Mid 30s has always been middle aged; in Hollywood it’s basically ancient for an actress. She was a dime a dozen cute teen; Hollywood is done with most attractive and can’t act women by mid to late 20s.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the only people who know you are aging millennials who know you from a trilogy you were in 15 years ago, you are not currently A-List. A-List is Leo,Matt Damon, Cruise, Emma Stone, Reese Witherspoon tier. Stewart is just a dime a dozen washed up child star; a middle aged actress who has to stoop to these antics for some attention. It’s sad, really.

she was the first American to win a Cesar award... Maybe you just not cultured when it comes to cinema. she's an indie darling

Wow! Her parading around in this outfit proves you’re wrong. She’s desperate to generate buzz and attention.