Burke, Field, St Andrews

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hear Bullis is easier for kids who need accommodations over St Andrews these days. Darm you Trump!

St. Andrew's has gotten too big for it's britches. They think they are St. Albans in the suburbs. There is nothing wrong with the school, but it isn't one of the better schools in the area.

Thank you for making me laugh! You hit it right on. St. Andrew's does think they are St. Albans 2.0.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hear Bullis is easier for kids who need accommodations over St Andrews these days. Darm you Trump!

St. Andrew's has gotten too big for it's britches. They think they are St. Albans in the suburbs. There is nothing wrong with the school, but it isn't one of the better schools in the area.

Thank you for making me laugh! You hit it right on. St. Andrew's does think they are St. Albans 2.0.

We left St. Andrew’s and I can say, though delusional exists, it doesn’t exist to the extent that ANY believes the school is or can be like St. Albans. We left very disappointed and dissatisfied but still I can say, they know they aren’t one of the better schools. They just seem to be ineffective in solving the growing significant problems there. *shrug*

[Anonymous]

Field consistently has the best college results of the three.

[Anonymous]

Our kid is at Field and I would say that the small size was a draw—we didn’t consider larger schools. I can imagine if your kid needs accommodations that is more doable in a small school. But would also flag that a smaller school will have fewer supportive services.

[Anonymous]

We have friends at all three and they love each

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hear Bullis is easier for kids who need accommodations over St Andrews these days. Darm you Trump!

St. Andrew's has gotten too big for it's britches. They think they are St. Albans in the suburbs. There is nothing wrong with the school, but it isn't one of the better schools in the area.

Thank you for making me laugh! You hit it right on. St. Andrew's does think they are St. Albans 2.0.

We left St. Andrew’s and I can say, though delusional exists, it doesn’t exist to the extent that ANY believes the school is or can be like St. Albans. We left very disappointed and dissatisfied but still I can say, they know they aren’t one of the better schools. They just seem to be ineffective in solving the growing significant problems there. *shrug*

Could you pls elaborate on the growing problems and which school, upper or lower?

[Anonymous]

We looked at all three for high school and chose Field. Extremely happy with decision.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hear Bullis is easier for kids who need accommodations over St Andrews these days. Darm you Trump!

St. Andrew's has gotten too big for it's britches. They think they are St. Albans in the suburbs. There is nothing wrong with the school, but it isn't one of the better schools in the area.

Thank you for making me laugh! You hit it right on. St. Andrew's does think they are St. Albans 2.0.

We left St. Andrew’s and I can say, though delusional exists, it doesn’t exist to the extent that ANY believes the school is or can be like St. Albans. We left very disappointed and dissatisfied but still I can say, they know they aren’t one of the better schools. They just seem to be ineffective in solving the growing significant problems there. *shrug*

Could you pls elaborate on the growing problems and which school, upper or lower?

If you are truly interested, just look up all the posts on SAES and you will get all the information you're looking for.