Those 41 accidents are fairly significant to those involved in them. Particularly when there is absolutely no reason that those accidents needed to happen. And anyone who argues that a lack - let alone a low number - of accidents is evidence of the absence of dangerous driving is either a total moron or thinks he/she is surrounded by morons. |
This idiot is not only extremely unobservant but apparently lives in total ignorance of the concept of a speed limit. |
Cool anecdote, bro. I can do this too. In fact, I was biking today and came upon a crosswalk where someone was waiting to cross. I came to a stop to let the person cross. An F-150 or some such truck blasted right by me and straight through the crosswalk. You are welcome to come and observe my biking habits anytime. I see plenty of other cyclists practicing lawful Idaho Stops and some that act like jerks, such as I observe plenty of respectful drivers and some jerks. |
This |
What we need is diligent -- I would say, aggressive -- policing and enforcement of DC's traffic laws against all operators who are subject to them: motorists and cyclists. |
Well you certainly won’t get it from the Connecticut Ave ANCs who have all called for police to stop enforcement of traffic laws. |
The police tell a very different story than the cyclists on this thread |
The fact that you have failed to provide a link to your source does not lend credibility to your post. Any accident investigator worth their salt knows that most accidents have multiple causes and the fact that this list attributes a single cause to each accident raises more questions than it answers. |
|
“Keyboard Kommando”? Weird flex, MAMIL. |
I don’t understand this post in the context of this thread. It doesn’t make any sense. I’m sure it seemed hilarious to you while you were typing it, but to the rest of us, it just says you’ve had about 5-6 too many edibles today. |
Not PP, but also found it hilarious. |
Speak for yourself Dr. Smellyface. |
It seems like DOT was specifically addressing posts like yours: https://www.transportation.gov/mission/health/commute-mode-share The greatest limitation to commute mode share data is that only travel to work is considered, and not all trips made throughout the day, nor trips by unemployed individuals. Commutes account for less than 20%of all trips taken, but commutes have a unique role when considering the balance of overall trips by determining peak travel demand across transportation systems (Federal Highway Administration, 2011). Nonetheless, the data showing commute mode share miss important information on other trips made throughout the day, which might include more walking and bicycling. You also like to cite the numbers for the 11 county metro area, rather than the more DC specific numbers. Walk/Bike commute share was 16% for DC residents and transit was equal to driving at 41% each. Which means only a minority of DC residents commute by car, while demanding all the infrastructure cater to them. Lastly and mostly hilariously, is that 90% of Walk/Bike commuters are satisfied with their commute while only 51% of drivers can say the same. That's probably why the drivers on this thread come across as so miserable. |
I just saw something pretty funny. The Connecticut Avenue opponents have been touting their 3,600 person petition to the Mayor to oppose the safety plans. Those signatures were gathered over 2+ years.
In a week, the supporters petition since DDOT announced the abandonment of Concept C, has gained over 4,000 signatures. If the opponents want to talk about how wildly unpopular the Mayor's plan is, then they need to back it up. The fact that it took less than a week to top those numbers is quite amazing. |