You are a statistical anomaly. Likely no issues supporting other family members, or hardships, etc |
beg to differ. MANY middle class kids are doing travel sports. they shouldn't be, but they are. |
Of course they don’t. My dd was full pay and her friends were mixed, financial aid, full pay, merit scholarships. They talked about money but weren’t making friends based on anything financial. |
We supported my mil and I could not work as we could not afford care as I was the caretaker. And, a special needs kid plus my own health issues. We’ve had it all. Stop acting like those things justify your lack of savings. |
Mine do expensive activities. It is our one splurge. Real middle class aren’t doing real travel sports. |
If your income is insufficient to pay for things like food and utilities, you are definitely qualifying for financial aid. |
That’s capitalism. What you’re asking for is a socialist program. States are getting much better about subsidizing or paying for trade degrees that will qualify graduates for a career. But private schools can accept the top students regardless of their ability to pay. No one is forced to go to these schools. No college is taking a student because he is low income. He’s accepted to the college based on his hard work and given aid to attend. He has nothing to do with your child not being accepted or not being offered any scholarships. |
You’re not a high earner if you can’t take afford monthly payments to make up the deficit on what you saved. Welcome to the middle class where you’re on your own. |
People still do it. We will do it for our kids, one already in private school and my sister does it for her two in state public colleges. Quite a few actually now that I think of it. Maybe some took out a home equity loan, not sure. I don’t think we are in the minority either. |
That’s one reason so many people don’t use 529 accounts. Not worth the risks and money can grow faster in other ways. |
Exactly. Don’t believe someone who is “quite wealthy” would be turning down MIT or Harvard or Stanford because that would be a waste of money. |
“No college is taking a student because he is low income. He’s accepted to the college based on his hard work and given aid to attend. He has nothing to do with your child not being accepted or not being offered any scholarships.”
1. Low income is indeed part of what someone may be accepted to a college given USNWR gives you bumps for number of tell grant kids. 2. Of course financial aid kids impact those not getting financial aid. The latter are being asked to cross subsidize the former through higher tuition. |
If you can’t afford to live there, then don’t live there. I can’t afford a Bentley, so I drive a no-frills Escape. |
But no one is getting admitted who is not unqualified. No one is getting admitted solely because they are poor. Colleges may feel that a kid who grows up with the handicap of poverty but still excels is a stronger candidate than someone with the same stats but has been given every opportunity. Do you not get that? Or do you just not want to? More importantly - most of the elite schools we are talking about here are need blind. So on those you are wrong twice.
Wrong again! In need blind schools there is no correlation, admissions are done independently from financials and then the financial aid budget is doled our but a completely separate group. It has way more to do with endowments than current income from tuitions. Learn how this works before you post again. |
With all due respect, your post seems like you haven’t actually visited a large public university. It is not what you expect (or I expected). Money is thankfully not an issue for us. We were expecting to pay $100k and have saved. DS did get into several privates (though not top 20) I really can’t stress enough to donut hole families to at least look at public universities. You will be surprised. And many offer good merit. |