And a story about NPR in the NYT. The comments are particularly interesting. Lots of strong feelings about NPR, most of them not good.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/24/business/media/npr-uri-berliner-diversity.html?unlocked_article_code=1.nE0.6gHu.zNslOwxPSicF&smid=url-share |
I feel the same way, and have stopped listening to NPR completely. |
This is what happens when you let your news organizations be run by Twitter trolls. |
So much projection here! |
I loved it before they got woke. |
Thanks for sharing. The comments reflect how I've been feeling about NPR |
No shit. Anyone with ears knows this. Every. Single. Piece. They publish includes one of the following words "black, gay, trans, oppressed, minority, race, or identity" It isn't about news coverage. It's about an agenda. |
Its a bummer. I used to love NPR.
Even This American Life is not what it once was. They just aired a series of stories about some dude in Gaza and never even asked him his opinion on Hamas' attack *that created the situation they are making the story about*. It was so so bizarre. |
If you read the comments, many of them echo what’s been said here. And one of the reporters, Peters, keeps responding “I’ve heard that a lot as I was reporting this article.” I suppose content issues didn’t make it into the article. |
This is BS. I was listening this morning and not one piece about that. They were talking with people in China about the economy. There was a period in 2021 or so after George Floyd when it felt this way. It was a huge social movement. When I felt myself getting annoyed, I took a breath and thought, for decades it's been all-white-all-the-time. It was a reckoning for us to have to listen to these stories and give them consideration. It is okay to be made uncomfortable sometimes. You can reflect. You might not change your mind. But it is good to listen to other perspectives. Now a few years later, there are still some identity-based stories, but not nearly so many. Lots of coverage is just news of the day. |
You listened to one story this morning about China, and you think that justifies calling BS on NPR’s descent into propaganda over the last decade? omg |
DP. Among other things, I found this interesting in the article: NPR managers were disappointed last fall when a report showed that Blacks and Hispanics were 11% and 16%, respectively, of their audience. This needle hadn't moved despite the North Star efforts.
But in the 2020 Census, Blacks were 12.4% and 18.7% of the overall US population (https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/08/improved-race-ethnicity-measures-reveal-united-states-population-much-more-multiracial.html). That's certainly higher, but not much higher, than their share of NPR's audience. So what is NPR's strategy here? Do they think diversifying coverage is simply the right thing to do? I'd agree generally, but when does it become overshooting in terms of providing diversity in povs, or in political povs? Is this effort aimed at moving the needle in nonwhite audience by about 4 percentage points? Or do they want to overshoot that? Or, given the indisputable fact that the nonwhite population is growing rapidly, is NPR's strategy to get ahead of the curve? |
+ “migrant”. Not to mention their sob stories all sound clearly exaggerated if not 100% fake to push their agenda du jour. And everything is always slanted to smear white people in the West. NPR is complete garbage. |
No, moron, that was just one example. The criticism on here are overdone and overwrought. |
+1 The people complaining obviously don’t listen to it today. |