Fairfax County Double Murder

[Anonymous]

The post you are referring to does not say JR introduced the idea of knife play. It doesn’t claim that either one introduced the idea. It said:


- They discussed blood play (cutting)
- CB asked JR, "Do you still want to tear off my clothes? I have a set of old pajamas you can tear"

Why are you literally lying about previous posts? It's the line RIGHT ABOVE where you started the cut-n-paste from. There's no way you accidentally missed that.
Link to page 144: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/2145/1159167.page

- CB and JR communicated using Fetlife and Telegram.
- JR brought up the idea of bringing a knife, CB asked about the details.
- They discussed blood play (cutting)
- CB asked JR, "Do you still want to tear off my clothes? I have a set of old pajamas you can tear"
- A set of ripped pajamas was recovered from the scene
- Pics of a knife, ropes, chains, rubber restraints were sent by JR to CB
- CB took selfie in a bathing suit and sent to husband. A few hours later sent the same selfie to JR with caption: "I sent this to my husband and he didn't even notice I lost 20 pounds"
- Judge questioned about the 45 min phone call over telegram that occurred between CB and JR
- After the phone call, JR texted: "It was great hearing your sexy voice"
- JR wrote that he had only done blood play once before, with razor blades
- CB had several superficial cuts that barely broke the skin
- JR was in the process of cutting CB with BB walked in
- CB wrote "trip to the zoo" on calendar
- CB had multiple lacerations to her neck and carotid artery. Three lacerations to the right side of her neck were the most likely the cause of death
- In the second 911 call, (mentioned but not played) BB is trying to save CB's life by applying pressure

[Anonymous]

Best not to engage with the BB defenders smearing the victims. They try to get posts deleted and the thread locked or deleted as the first one was.

Hearing to set trial related dates today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Check out page 144 of this thread. The post is highly detailed. It is either an amazing troll job or it is true reflection of what happened at the hearing and really challenges the idea BB set up the meeting between Joe and CB."

Again, not fact. These were, according to PP, things brought up according to transcripts of electronic exchanges between JR and CB. But very few people believe (not fact admittedly) that someone else was behind "CB" persona.

The people who do believe that, having seen all evidence, including that under seal, include prosecutors from the Commonwealth of VA. We have not seen "transcripts" just notes from people claiming to be in the courtroom.

I personally think it most likely that CB was involved in some of the comms, a mix would create the maximum confusion and best shield the scheme. However she and JR did not know they were being lured under a ruse to their deaths.

Trial date set today.

Perhaps it approaching will cause the AP to do a bit more thinking. They have no future, she will be in a cage until deported. The case has gotten covered in Brazil. She has not only killed but destroyed her own life. May be time to cut her losses?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"Check out page 144 of this thread. The post is highly detailed. It is either an amazing troll job or it is true reflection of what happened at the hearing and really challenges the idea BB set up the meeting between Joe and CB."

Again, not fact. These were, according to PP, things brought up according to transcripts of electronic exchanges between JR and CB. But very few people believe (not fact admittedly) that someone else was behind "CB" persona.

The people who do believe that, having seen all evidence, including that under seal, include prosecutors from the Commonwealth of VA. We have not seen "transcripts" just notes from people claiming to be in the courtroom.

I personally think it most likely that CB was involved in some of the comms, a mix would create the maximum confusion and best shield the scheme. However she and JR did not know they were being lured under a ruse to their deaths.

Trial date set today.

Perhaps it approaching will cause the AP to do a bit more thinking. They have no future, she will be in a cage until deported. The case has gotten covered in Brazil. She has not only killed but destroyed her own life. May be time to cut her losses?

If BB had a plan to stab his wife and pin it on JR, I’m not sure AP was in on it. Her actions that day just seem so… stupid. Either way, I think it’s good she is being tried because it is not at all clear that her shooting of JR was reasonable.

[Anonymous]

I think it's likely she will be convicted. As you say, her actions were not reasonable and I think a jury will agree.

[Anonymous]

Written version of Fox story https://www.fox5dc.com/news/trial-date-for-au-pair-charged-in-herndon-double-homicide-expected-thursday

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Best not to engage with the BB defenders smearing the victims. They try to get posts deleted and the thread locked or deleted as the first one was.

Hearing to set trial related dates today.

I haven't seen a single BB "defender" smear the victims. Projecting much? I've seen random internet trolls, but those posts are obvious and get removed. I've seen plenty of smears against BB despite no actual evidence. It's crazy you BB "offenders" say "wait for the evidence" whenever some details come out that make BB look less guilty. We presume INNOCENCE not GUILT in america.

Are you kidding? The BB defender posts are so obvious - they make me sick.

You are sick because you formed an opinion a year ago and are emotionally attached to it.

When new information becomes available it ok to evaluate it and see if it changes the probability of certain theories being true. I'm not a BB defender, in fact I follow this case because I DON'T KNOW what happened and the possibilities are fascinating to me. I will defend the concept of innocence until guilt is proven, and the importance of honest dialog based on all the information available, an the importance of challenging LE to prove their case. You seem to want to shout down anyone who doesn't fully support the theory that BB planned the entire thing and manipulated everyone involved.

[Anonymous]

" I will defend the concept of innocence until guilt is proven, and the importance of honest dialog based on all the information available, an the importance of challenging LE to prove their case."

How do you feel about defending First Amendment rights to free speech in a public forum? DCUM isn't a court of law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Best not to engage with the BB defenders smearing the victims. They try to get posts deleted and the thread locked or deleted as the first one was.

Hearing to set trial related dates today.

I haven't seen a single BB "defender" smear the victims. Projecting much? I've seen random internet trolls, but those posts are obvious and get removed. I've seen plenty of smears against BB despite no actual evidence. It's crazy you BB "offenders" say "wait for the evidence" whenever some details come out that make BB look less guilty. We presume INNOCENCE not GUILT in america.

Are you kidding? The BB defender posts are so obvious - they make me sick.

Esp the ones calling CB a wh**e and hoping that Joe suffered. Sick people. Birds of a feather.

If LE believed it was self defense there would have been NO arrest. They would NOT be prosecuting AP and have been engaged in a year+ investigation. The Commonwealth prosecutors believe that it was a ruse and Joe was lured to be set up. They have been clear and they have seen all the evidence, including that not yet entered and that entered under seal. They certainly would not indicate an additional arrest in the future for a crime they believed committed by a dead man. Karma and the law will come for those who snuffed out 2 lives rather than split the $. Of course, his middle class life, if halved, may have been far less attractive to AP. They share abhorrent greed and lack any moral compass whatsoever.

[Anonymous]

All information is not yet publicly available.

[Anonymous]

July 29th.

That is fast. I thought some trials took years to get on the schedule?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Do we know where it’s gonna be at, what time, more info?

[Anonymous]

Prior articles stated AP faces a possible 43 years. I guess less time served.

To sane people a plea deal would look like a great option. For someone who did what she did at her age, all bets are off. BB is sure counting on it though. He'll likely be called at trial and plead the 5th repeatedly in another spectacle.

She will be deported after serving sentence. Their time playing house is over.

Not sure what she hopes to gain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do we know where it’s gonna be at, what time, more info?

It will be at the Fairfax County Circuit Court. There may be further delays. More articles will be forthcoming.