Really freaked out after reading an "Incel" blog

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Because you dehumanize women and this makes you an immediate joke and not worthy of a seat at the table. For this your voice will never be heard and you will always be written off into irrelevancy.


Of course, for you, as with all modern women, not allowing women to subjugate men through the vote is considered subjugation of women. This logic is so twisted that a response is pointless.

As for whether or not my voice will be heard, I don't know what this even means. I told you I don't want to change any politics just by writing. I want a group of decent men who will live secluded from the plague of modern society. Trying to change anything in a political system where 90 percent of people can't understand written text is a waste of time.

tib
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:You know what is a good indicator of a lunatic?


I do. Diagnosing online or sticking to insane dogmas of a hate cult like feminism usually tip me off http://thatincelblogger.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/why-youre-probably-a-feminist-or-their-useful-idiot-and-a-12-step-programme-on-how-to-stop-being-one/

tib
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Because you dehumanize women and this makes you an immediate joke and not worthy of a seat at the table. For this your voice will never be heard and you will always be written off into irrelevancy.


Of course, for you, as with all modern women, not allowing women to subjugate men through the vote is considered subjugation of women. This logic is so twisted that a response is pointless.

As for whether or not my voice will be heard, I don't know what this even means. I told you I don't want to change any politics just by writing. I want a group of decent men who will live secluded from the plague of modern society. Trying to change anything in a political system where 90 percent of people can't understand written text is a waste of time.

tib


Bye then. Go slither back in the whole you crawled out of. Take your friends too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Methinks this incel is closeted:

You can become coalpha men living in co-operation with other decent men.


I am not a closeted anything. I've never had homosexual experiences and fantasies. Also, the man running the coalpha project and married and has two children.

Co-operation among men is a foundation of a successful civilization because it makes men compete for women based on how good the seduction skills of these males are. But since seduction has no inherent value for survival of species and co-operation is necessary this makes civilizations die.


http://www.coalpha.org/How-Feminism-Destroys-Society-td6440834.html

It is widely accepted by this audience that feminism destroys society. But I have yet to see a convincing explanation for how this happens.

One common argument is that feminism destroys marriage and so men without a family aren't motivated to work. This sounds logical in theory but isn't beared out in practice. What we have in the real world is a society where most men are manginas, desperate for status and money in the hope that these will deliver sex. And these manginas are quite willing to work hard, and they do in America today. In spite of the fact that Americans are working as hard as ever, America is clearly in economic decline.

Another argument is that children raised without fathers tend to be less productive. This is true but still fails to explain the facts. In many societies in history, large numbers of men were killed at war leaving many children without fathers. These societies did not collapse as a result. So while the loss of fatherhood is certainly harmful, it fails to explain how a society can collapse because of feminism.

My belief is that feminism destroys society by destroying trust and cooperation in society. I believe that trust requires that the sexes be separated. When the sexes are mixed, it is the natural instinct of men to compete for women and to try to impress women. And it is the instinct of women to compete for the attention of men. Competition is the opposite of cooperation. When the sexes are segregated, people have no immediate reason to compete socially and so cooperation is possible. I know from personal experience that a conversation of just men is completely different from a conversation that includes women. When there are only men, the men tend to be more straight forward and less concerned with how they appear. This kind of honest direct communication allows trust to be established.

Another aspect of this break down of trust is that fact that society becomes very sexually unequal with some men monopolizing all the women. This makes all men subconsciously aware that society is an intense sexual competition with no fairness or equality. So while the manginas may work hard, their sense of competition is intense and overrides any sense of honesty or decency. They will do anything to get laid including stabbing their fellow man in the back.

The book Trust: The Social Virtues and The Creation of Prosperity makes clear that the economy of a society depends on its trust structure. In societies with mild mixing of the sexes, trust can still exist within a family where there is no sexual competition. This book describes such societies. They can survive but won't be nearly as prosperous as a high-trust society. In societies with virulent feminism, even the extended family can't survive and so no one trust anyone else and society simply collapses. All of the high-trust societies were based on segregating the sexes and encouraging female modesty. But most of these societies are afflicted by feminism today and are rapidly becoming low-trust societies and will soon collapse. The financial scandals that we have recently seen are examples of the kind of trust violations that destroy society.


tib
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The author of the blog is just looney. There are a bunch of weirdos on both extremes of the political spectrum so I don't agree with your assessment that the world is going to hell in a hand basket for women. I say this as a strong feminists who doesn't get up in arms over every lunatic who posts a comment on the web...


While your name calling is really silly you do have a point that people like me are no threat to you. We are too few in numbers. But we don't even need to attack you. Your civilization will collapse on its own. What will survive will be intolerant, patriarchal cultures and religions which will re-impose sanity. Of course, I am guessing that many will die in the process of a collapse of the West but it is better that they do -90 percent of those in it are scum.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's not just some loons. There are serious (or semi-serious) people in the conservative movement who sincerely believe that granting women the right to vote was a mistake. Ann Coulter and David Barton are probably the two people who are most out front on this issue.


Please. Anne coulter is an entertainer. Do you take Kim Kardashian's opinion seriously as well?


David Braxton isn't an entertainer. He's a serious guy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's not just some loons. There are serious (or semi-serious) people in the conservative movement who sincerely believe that granting women the right to vote was a mistake. Ann Coulter and David Barton are probably the two people who are most out front on this issue.


Please. Anne coulter is an entertainer. Do you take Kim Kardashian's opinion seriously as well?


David Braxton isn't an entertainer. He's a serious guy.


Sorry. Barton, not Braxton.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Barton_(author)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There are lots of people out there who believe offensive things. There always have been. But now their blogs, basically a diary, is out there in public.

It doesn't matter, there aren't enough of these people to enslave you and force you into prostitution.


My freshman humanities teacher said her father said something similar in the very early 1930s. These people are nuts. No one intelligent pays attention to them. They'll never have enough power to do any harm. Within a decade, they controlled half of Europe.


There is a huge difference, though. Nazis expressed what most Germans though but didn't dare to say, especially in regards to Versailles peace treaty and Jews. My attitudes, on the other hand, are rejected by most men. While there are some men who do think like me and are afraid to say so, most men in today's society are degenerate feminists.

If you are shot, who do you blame, the bullet or the person who pulled the trigger? And which do you think these women are closer to? For me, the answer is unquestionably that they are like the bullet. Women are not capable of independent thought, so they cannot really be held responsible for their actions. All traditional societies have recognized this and have held the father or the husband responsible, while of course giving them the authority they needed to guide women’s behavior. Modern women can no more be blamed for their behavior than a spoiled toddler can be blamed for throwing a tantrum.

It is the men in modern culture who are fully responsible for the horrible culture that causes women to misbehave. If men came to their senses, they could instantly revoke women’s vote and enforce basic rules of decency including monogamy. It wouldn’t take long before women learned to behave in a civilized manner. So don’t think I blame women.

tib
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This incel thing has a worldwide following already. Apparently, they think that there's no use for American women and they will marry women (preferably white) from non-feminist societies (Russia?) and then raise non-feminist, white kids.


You are wrong. Incel has no "worldwide following", since it's not some ideology, merely a lack of relationship/sex involuntarily for over 6 months against your will and not due to being picky.

Of course there is no use for American women. American women are the scum of the Earth, worst women in the world.

Russia isn't really an option anymore. It's become significantly wealthier since 2000 and there's also a strong right wing/xenophobic movement. Plus the current political situation....

Some good places might still exist, but unfortunately most of the world is becoming feminist very rapidly.

tib

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's not just some loons. There are serious (or semi-serious) people in the conservative movement who sincerely believe that granting women the right to vote was a mistake. Ann Coulter and David Barton are probably the two people who are most out front on this issue.


Dude. They are not in the conservative movement. They are wackadoodles, plain and simple.
Anonymous
Sounds like a 15 year old boy, not a man.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The author of the blog is just looney. There are a bunch of weirdos on both extremes of the political spectrum so I don't agree with your assessment that the world is going to hell in a hand basket for women. I say this as a strong feminists who doesn't get up in arms over every lunatic who posts a comment on the web...


I don't think we're going to turn to state-sponsored prostitution, but the fact that anti-choice activists are carving away at women's ability to determine their reproductive future should chill you to your bones.

And let's stop pretending that the nuts of the left in any way equal the nuts of the right.


No, you will never turn to state sponsored prostitution because you already have worse than that. Prostitutes are at least not sponsored by the state and give themselves for money.

Modern Western women are sponsored by the state and give themselves for immorality and stupidity.

So don't insult prostitutes by comparing them to modern Western women.

As for abortion, I am strongly in favor or abortion and think it should be easily accessible everywhere. Abortions usually kill liberal babies, and anything that lowers the number of liberals is a good thing.

tib
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like a 15 year old boy, not a man.


Thank you for your substantial arguments, dear.

tib
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's not just some loons. There are serious (or semi-serious) people in the conservative movement who sincerely believe that granting women the right to vote was a mistake. Ann Coulter and David Barton are probably the two people who are most out front on this issue.


Dude. They are not in the conservative movement. They are wackadoodles, plain and simple.


Coulter makes the rounds on Hannity and Beck, etc.

Barton does the same. They're in the movement.
Anonymous
Oh geez, way to link to this wacko's blog on here. This same thing happened on another forum that I read and he came over and spread his mentally ill diatribe everywhere for days until he was banned. People do track where their blog hits are coming from ...
Forum Index » Off-Topic
Go to: