"No Labels" Party

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What, exactly, would you have Biden do, short of stacking the court?

I would have him order the Justice Department to open criminal investigations into each case in which a woman has been denied care since Roe v. Wade in direct contradiction of the instructions of the federal government that lifesaving care must still be provided. Hospitals claim they’re afraid to perform abortion because they’re afraid of the states, let them weigh that against their legal vulnerability to federal charges.

I would have had him say more than one sentence about abortion during the state of the union.

I would have had him propose legislation in the lame duck session to codify Roe and out every one of these “moderate republicans” on record ahead of their reelection.

I would have had him order every federal
agency to provide a risk-mitigation plan for federal employees who might find themselves ordered to work in states where they cannot access healthcare.

That’s the short list.

Good list!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Individuals with ties to Manchin are doubtful that he might surface as a No Labels candidate, per The Times.

Joe Manchin is not going to run for president as an independent (or “No Labels”) candidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What, exactly, would you have Biden do, short of stacking the court?

I would have him order the Justice Department to open criminal investigations into each case in which a woman has been denied care since Roe v. Wade in direct contradiction of the instructions of the federal government that lifesaving care must still be provided. Hospitals claim they’re afraid to perform abortion because they’re afraid of the states, let them weigh that against their legal vulnerability to federal charges.

I would have had him say more than one sentence about abortion during the state of the union.

I would have had him propose legislation in the lame duck session to codify Roe and out every one of these “moderate republicans” on record ahead of their reelection.

I would have had him order every federal
agency to provide a risk-mitigation plan for federal employees who might find themselves ordered to work in states where they cannot access healthcare.

That’s the short list.

Good list!

The House did pass a law codifying Roe but it had nowhere to go in the Senate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What, exactly, would you have Biden do, short of stacking the court?

I would have him order the Justice Department to open criminal investigations into each case in which a woman has been denied care since Roe v. Wade in direct contradiction of the instructions of the federal government that lifesaving care must still be provided. Hospitals claim they’re afraid to perform abortion because they’re afraid of the states, let them weigh that against their legal vulnerability to federal charges.

I would have had him say more than one sentence about abortion during the state of the union.

I would have had him propose legislation in the lame duck session to codify Roe and out every one of these “moderate republicans” on record ahead of their reelection.

I would have had him order every federal
agency to provide a risk-mitigation plan for federal employees who might find themselves ordered to work in states where they cannot access healthcare.

That’s the short list.

Good list!

The House did pass a law codifying Roe but it had nowhere to go in the Senate.

It went further than codifying Roe. And Schumer still never brought it to the floor for a vote, which again, would have put all of these “kavanaugh lied to me” boo-hooers on the record.

Biden is a better candidate that Trump for women, but he takes the support of women for granted, while not delivering for them even in ways that are within his powers. That should scare him, especially if someone does stake a moderate (codify Roe) position.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What, exactly, would you have Biden do, short of stacking the court?

I would have him order the Justice Department to open criminal investigations into each case in which a woman has been denied care since Roe v. Wade in direct contradiction of the instructions of the federal government that lifesaving care must still be provided. Hospitals claim they’re afraid to perform abortion because they’re afraid of the states, let them weigh that against their legal vulnerability to federal charges.

I would have had him say more than one sentence about abortion during the state of the union.

I would have had him propose legislation in the lame duck session to codify Roe and out every one of these “moderate republicans” on record ahead of their reelection.

I would have had him order every federal
agency to provide a risk-mitigation plan for federal employees who might find themselves ordered to work in states where they cannot access healthcare.

That’s the short list.

Good list!

The House did pass a law codifying Roe but it had nowhere to go in the Senate.

It went further than codifying Roe. And Schumer still never brought it to the floor for a vote, which again, would have put all of these “kavanaugh lied to me” boo-hooers on the record.

Biden is a better candidate that Trump for women, but he takes the support of women for granted, while not delivering for them even in ways that are within his powers. That should scare him, especially if someone does stake a moderate (codify Roe) position.

How exactly did it go further than codifying Roe? Roe, not Casey. Roe. Be specific.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What, exactly, would you have Biden do, short of stacking the court?

I would have him order the Justice Department to open criminal investigations into each case in which a woman has been denied care since Roe v. Wade in direct contradiction of the instructions of the federal government that lifesaving care must still be provided. Hospitals claim they’re afraid to perform abortion because they’re afraid of the states, let them weigh that against their legal vulnerability to federal charges.

I would have had him say more than one sentence about abortion during the state of the union.

I would have had him propose legislation in the lame duck session to codify Roe and out every one of these “moderate republicans” on record ahead of their reelection.

I would have had him order every federal
agency to provide a risk-mitigation plan for federal employees who might find themselves ordered to work in states where they cannot access healthcare.

That’s the short list.

Good list!

The House did pass a law codifying Roe but it had nowhere to go in the Senate.

It went further than codifying Roe. And Schumer still never brought it to the floor for a vote, which again, would have put all of these “kavanaugh lied to me” boo-hooers on the record.

Biden is a better candidate that Trump for women, but he takes the support of women for granted, while not delivering for them even in ways that are within his powers. That should scare him, especially if someone does stake a moderate (codify Roe) position.

How exactly did it go further than codifying Roe? Roe, not Casey. Roe. Be specific.

Roe didn’t have prohibitions against post-viability restrictions on abortion after the second trimester, that was up to the states.

Which is not relevant, really, because no one had the courage to put it up for a vote, assuming women would just turn out to keep them in power and the hundreds or thousands of women suffering right now were a reasonable price to pay to get strong election turnout in 24.

[Anonymous]

Oh please, the GOP wasn't letting it get past the filibuster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh please, the GOP wasn't letting it get past the filibuster.

They did for gay marriage.

And again: no one tried. Don’t expect the people in power to be exempt from criticism when they choose not to exercise that power.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh please, the GOP wasn't letting it get past the filibuster.

They did for gay marriage.

And again: no one tried. Don’t expect the people in power to be exempt from criticism when they choose not to exercise that power.

Schumer’s didn’t put it on the floor because he knew it wouldn’t pass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Conservative here- I would vote for Manchin Gabbard.

Of course you would. That is the point. They aren't "dems" but have been labeled as such.

I think we all need to move towards a middle we can live with….

Nope. I refuse to compromise on anything if it means a GOP’r gets something they want.

Hell no.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

It’s not a party. It’s the opposite of a party.

[Anonymous]

Republicans have been conjuring up third party candidates to mess with elections at least since Lee Atwater did it in 1978 in South Carolina.

[Anonymous]

😆

[Anonymous]