Ukrainian victory over Russia is inevitable

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You’re response is a lame “whataboutism?”

You are a racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Russian logistics are barely able to supply their troops with the bare necessities to survive and fight right now. Hypothermia and frostbite casualties have been massive (and covered up). Hunger and malnutrition hamper current efforts. Russia is in no position to effectively use one of their nukes.

If the Russian army is as bad as you say, why do Ukrainians need billions of dollars and massive military aid to fight it? And why should the rest of Europe be told to fear them?

Russia has 3,300 active tanks and another 8-10k in storage. Russia has 1.5 million active duty and 2.2 in reserves. The US contributes the most to NATO with 1.3 million active duty, next is Turkey 446k, France 207k, Germany 188k, etc. Germany has 320 tanks. Europe could not stop Russia without the US.

People said that Russia has used 90% of their military power in Ukraine already

So which is true?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You’re response is a lame “whataboutism?”

“Whataboutism” is something only nato people use as retorts that carry no weight for the majority of global population

Also I’ve noticed that white people in the us use “whataboutism” as a crutch more than poc’s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Russian logistics are barely able to supply their troops with the bare necessities to survive and fight right now. Hypothermia and frostbite casualties have been massive (and covered up). Hunger and malnutrition hamper current efforts. Russia is in no position to effectively use one of their nukes.

If the Russian army is as bad as you say, why do Ukrainians need billions of dollars and massive military aid to fight it? And why should the rest of Europe be told to fear them?

Russia has 3,300 active tanks and another 8-10k in storage. Russia has 1.5 million active duty and 2.2 in reserves. The US contributes the most to NATO with 1.3 million active duty, next is Turkey 446k, France 207k, Germany 188k, etc. Germany has 320 tanks. Europe could not stop Russia without the US.

Reality has shown that much of Russia's equipment in storage was left unmaintained, is rusted out, was stripped for parts, et cetera. Generally untenable. As for Russia's active duty and reserve troops, if that were true then why are they sending conscripts with minimal training to the front?

The Russia of 2020 is nowhere near the Soviet Union of 1980 in terms of operational capacity. Not even remotely.

It's a rather damning indictment to have your $15 million dollar Pantsir systems failing and getting captured because the wheel bearings are seized or because the tires are dry rotted.

https://twitter.com/jan_forney/status/1499851864656990209

You know it's bad when your conscripts are being issued ancient, rusted AK-47s

https://twitter.com/JayinKyiv/status/1573630329058983937

or Mosin Nagant rifles from 1891 and WWII helmets

https://twitter.com/infussambas/status/1582364060108324865

$115 million dollar S-300 rocket system failures due to age and mishandling

https://twitter.com/DevanaUkraine/status/1627792618796027907

A lot of this is very likely due to Putin's oligarch friends holding the contracts to maintain and replenish supplies, but instead stealing the money for yet another yacht, condo in Dubai, etc.

And yet....the West is tying itself in knots trying to raise a kazillion dollars to fight this paper tiger. If they are so lame, why is it taking so long to defeat them?

One more time for those in the back....

Because even an untrained kid with mental issues and a rifle from WalMart needs a properly trained and equipped police force to take them down before they murder more innocents during a rampage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Russian logistics are barely able to supply their troops with the bare necessities to survive and fight right now. Hypothermia and frostbite casualties have been massive (and covered up). Hunger and malnutrition hamper current efforts. Russia is in no position to effectively use one of their nukes.

If the Russian army is as bad as you say, why do Ukrainians need billions of dollars and massive military aid to fight it? And why should the rest of Europe be told to fear them?

Russia has 3,300 active tanks and another 8-10k in storage. Russia has 1.5 million active duty and 2.2 in reserves. The US contributes the most to NATO with 1.3 million active duty, next is Turkey 446k, France 207k, Germany 188k, etc. Germany has 320 tanks. Europe could not stop Russia without the US.

Reality has shown that much of Russia's equipment in storage was left unmaintained, is rusted out, was stripped for parts, et cetera. Generally untenable. As for Russia's active duty and reserve troops, if that were true then why are they sending conscripts with minimal training to the front?

The Russia of 2020 is nowhere near the Soviet Union of 1980 in terms of operational capacity. Not even remotely.

It's a rather damning indictment to have your $15 million dollar Pantsir systems failing and getting captured because the wheel bearings are seized or because the tires are dry rotted.

https://twitter.com/jan_forney/status/1499851864656990209

You know it's bad when your conscripts are being issued ancient, rusted AK-47s

https://twitter.com/JayinKyiv/status/1573630329058983937

or Mosin Nagant rifles from 1891 and WWII helmets

https://twitter.com/infussambas/status/1582364060108324865

$115 million dollar S-300 rocket system failures due to age and mishandling

https://twitter.com/DevanaUkraine/status/1627792618796027907

A lot of this is very likely due to Putin's oligarch friends holding the contracts to maintain and replenish supplies, but instead stealing the money for yet another yacht, condo in Dubai, etc.

And yet....the West is tying itself in knots trying to raise a kazillion dollars to fight this paper tiger. If they are so lame, why is it taking so long to defeat them?

Dude. Drop the pointless hyperbole. 3000 tanks, even ones that have mechanical issues, is still a shit ton of tanks. Nobody ever said they are a "paper tiger." They are still a force to deal with, more than any of their neighbors could deal with individually, but not anywhere near what they were during the peak of the Soviet era.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Russian logistics are barely able to supply their troops with the bare necessities to survive and fight right now. Hypothermia and frostbite casualties have been massive (and covered up). Hunger and malnutrition hamper current efforts. Russia is in no position to effectively use one of their nukes.

If the Russian army is as bad as you say, why do Ukrainians need billions of dollars and massive military aid to fight it? And why should the rest of Europe be told to fear them?

Russia has 3,300 active tanks and another 8-10k in storage. Russia has 1.5 million active duty and 2.2 in reserves. The US contributes the most to NATO with 1.3 million active duty, next is Turkey 446k, France 207k, Germany 188k, etc. Germany has 320 tanks. Europe could not stop Russia without the US.

Reality has shown that much of Russia's equipment in storage was left unmaintained, is rusted out, was stripped for parts, et cetera. Generally untenable. As for Russia's active duty and reserve troops, if that were true then why are they sending conscripts with minimal training to the front?

The Russia of 2020 is nowhere near the Soviet Union of 1980 in terms of operational capacity. Not even remotely.

It's a rather damning indictment to have your $15 million dollar Pantsir systems failing and getting captured because the wheel bearings are seized or because the tires are dry rotted.

https://twitter.com/jan_forney/status/1499851864656990209

You know it's bad when your conscripts are being issued ancient, rusted AK-47s

https://twitter.com/JayinKyiv/status/1573630329058983937

or Mosin Nagant rifles from 1891 and WWII helmets

https://twitter.com/infussambas/status/1582364060108324865

$115 million dollar S-300 rocket system failures due to age and mishandling

https://twitter.com/DevanaUkraine/status/1627792618796027907

A lot of this is very likely due to Putin's oligarch friends holding the contracts to maintain and replenish supplies, but instead stealing the money for yet another yacht, condo in Dubai, etc.

And yet....the West is tying itself in knots trying to raise a kazillion dollars to fight this paper tiger. If they are so lame, why is it taking so long to defeat them?

One more time for those in the back....

Because even an untrained kid with mental issues and a rifle from WalMart needs a properly trained and equipped police force to take them down before they murder more innocents during a rampage.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re response is a lame “whataboutism?”

“Whataboutism” is something only nato people use as retorts that carry no weight for the majority of global population

Also I’ve noticed that white people in the us use “whataboutism” as a crutch more than poc’s

Ehhh, no. Whataboutism always was and still is a favorite Russian tactic. But then the west recognized it as a tactic and started using it right back at them. So now they complain about whataboutism whenever anyone but them uses it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Russian logistics are barely able to supply their troops with the bare necessities to survive and fight right now. Hypothermia and frostbite casualties have been massive (and covered up). Hunger and malnutrition hamper current efforts. Russia is in no position to effectively use one of their nukes.

If the Russian army is as bad as you say, why do Ukrainians need billions of dollars and massive military aid to fight it? And why should the rest of Europe be told to fear them?

Russia has 3,300 active tanks and another 8-10k in storage. Russia has 1.5 million active duty and 2.2 in reserves. The US contributes the most to NATO with 1.3 million active duty, next is Turkey 446k, France 207k, Germany 188k, etc. Germany has 320 tanks. Europe could not stop Russia without the US.

People said that Russia has used 90% of their military power in Ukraine already

So which is true?

What is true is that you are being willfully obtuse and keep presenting a false "which is it" paradigm despite being repeatedly corrected on it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re response is a lame “whataboutism?”

“Whataboutism” is something only nato people use as retorts that carry no weight for the majority of global population

Also I’ve noticed that white people in the us use “whataboutism” as a crutch more than poc’s

Ehhh, no. Whataboutism always was and still is a favorite Russian tactic. But then the west recognized it as a tactic and started using it right back at them. So now they complain about whataboutism whenever anyone but them uses it.

That's because you think the US never has to be called to account for what they did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Russian logistics are barely able to supply their troops with the bare necessities to survive and fight right now. Hypothermia and frostbite casualties have been massive (and covered up). Hunger and malnutrition hamper current efforts. Russia is in no position to effectively use one of their nukes.

If the Russian army is as bad as you say, why do Ukrainians need billions of dollars and massive military aid to fight it? And why should the rest of Europe be told to fear them?

Russia has 3,300 active tanks and another 8-10k in storage. Russia has 1.5 million active duty and 2.2 in reserves. The US contributes the most to NATO with 1.3 million active duty, next is Turkey 446k, France 207k, Germany 188k, etc. Germany has 320 tanks. Europe could not stop Russia without the US.

Reality has shown that much of Russia's equipment in storage was left unmaintained, is rusted out, was stripped for parts, et cetera. Generally untenable. As for Russia's active duty and reserve troops, if that were true then why are they sending conscripts with minimal training to the front?

The Russia of 2020 is nowhere near the Soviet Union of 1980 in terms of operational capacity. Not even remotely.

It's a rather damning indictment to have your $15 million dollar Pantsir systems failing and getting captured because the wheel bearings are seized or because the tires are dry rotted.

https://twitter.com/jan_forney/status/1499851864656990209

You know it's bad when your conscripts are being issued ancient, rusted AK-47s

https://twitter.com/JayinKyiv/status/1573630329058983937

or Mosin Nagant rifles from 1891 and WWII helmets

https://twitter.com/infussambas/status/1582364060108324865

$115 million dollar S-300 rocket system failures due to age and mishandling

https://twitter.com/DevanaUkraine/status/1627792618796027907

A lot of this is very likely due to Putin's oligarch friends holding the contracts to maintain and replenish supplies, but instead stealing the money for yet another yacht, condo in Dubai, etc.

And yet....the West is tying itself in knots trying to raise a kazillion dollars to fight this paper tiger. If they are so lame, why is it taking so long to defeat them?

One more time for those in the back....

Because even an untrained kid with mental issues and a rifle from WalMart needs a properly trained and equipped police force to take them down before they murder more innocents during a rampage.

Nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: Russian logistics are barely able to supply their troops with the bare necessities to survive and fight right now. Hypothermia and frostbite casualties have been massive (and covered up). Hunger and malnutrition hamper current efforts. Russia is in no position to effectively use one of their nukes.

If the Russian army is as bad as you say, why do Ukrainians need billions of dollars and massive military aid to fight it? And why should the rest of Europe be told to fear them?

Russia has 3,300 active tanks and another 8-10k in storage. Russia has 1.5 million active duty and 2.2 in reserves. The US contributes the most to NATO with 1.3 million active duty, next is Turkey 446k, France 207k, Germany 188k, etc. Germany has 320 tanks. Europe could not stop Russia without the US.

People said that Russia has used 90% of their military power in Ukraine already

So which is true?

You forgot the word “conventional” in military power (even then, you are still wrong).

Russia has used ZERO percent of its Nuclear, chemical, and biological military power in Ukraine.

In that sense, they are still extremely dangerous, you must agree.

But they have committed over 90% of their currently mobilized ground forces to Ukraine.

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-europe-64634760

I agree with the NATO and EU goal of supporting Ukraine until 100% of Ukraine is liberated from Putin’s illegal occupation.

Putin must stand trial in The Hague for war crimes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re response is a lame “whataboutism?”

“Whataboutism” is something only nato people use as retorts that carry no weight for the majority of global population

Also I’ve noticed that white people in the us use “whataboutism” as a crutch more than poc’s

Ehhh, no. Whataboutism always was and still is a favorite Russian tactic. But then the west recognized it as a tactic and started using it right back at them. So now they complain about whataboutism whenever anyone but them uses it.

That's because you think the US never has to be called to account for what they did.

“They” did?
Were ya writting from, Boris?

[Anonymous]

War will likely eventually end with new border very close to current line of control.

Is that a victory for Ukraine?

[Anonymous]

Time for peace.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Time for peace.

excellent. Go on home Russia and peace will be had.