Andrew Huberman Expose

[Anonymous]

Color me shocked.

And also are women who decline to sleep with men outside of marriage still considered to be insane?

Make it make sense.

[Anonymous]

Did anyone figure out if he’s an academic fraud as well? Does his “lab” at Stanford actually exist?

[Anonymous]

I tried listening to him a few times but found his podcast quite boring.

I enjoyed the expose, it's fascinating to get a peak into the unbelievable lives of some people. And while he's an amazingly huge jerk, and a hypocrite whose body at his age was created by more than supplements, working out, and healthy eating, I felt like the story was missing the agency of the women. The one woman that it focused on primarily only had about a gazillion red flags flying right in front of her face, yet she continued to shape her life around this a-hole and take his nonsense. The women are glowingly described as "beautiful, successful, educated" yet they all freely decided as adults to be with this egotistical, controlling man.

To me it highlighted less about Huberman, and more that there's no shortage of women who are desperate to stay with these men after they show who they truly are.

[Anonymous]

I KNEW something was off about this person. Funny, I listened intently to the episode with the psych, Dr. Conti, at least a few times. His episode on alcohol is widely touted in the stopdrinking subreddit.

[Anonymous]

Sounds like a freak.

[Anonymous]

Unfortunately, no one worth listening to would have a podcast for telling people what to do.

[Anonymous]

I also heard he was into sausage fests, if you know what I mean.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I tried listening to him a few times but found his podcast quite boring.

I enjoyed the expose, it's fascinating to get a peak into the unbelievable lives of some people. And while he's an amazingly huge jerk, and a hypocrite whose body at his age was created by more than supplements, working out, and healthy eating, I felt like the story was missing the agency of the women. The one woman that it focused on primarily only had about a gazillion red flags flying right in front of her face, yet she continued to shape her life around this a-hole and take his nonsense. The women are glowingly described as "beautiful, successful, educated" yet they all freely decided as adults to be with this egotistical, controlling man.

To me it highlighted less about Huberman, and more that there's no shortage of women who are desperate to stay with these men after they show who they truly are.

Yes, I agree with you. I'm a feminist but I think it's an untold side of the whole metoo movement. That women seem so primally driven to pursue men with power and status that they will put up with (or even enjoy) a lot – cheating, humiliation, debasement. In this case, these women probably had a lot of clues about him, but were willing to deal with it. After the fact, they gripe and complain, but something doesn't ring true.

Look at the hundreds of women who put up with Harvey Weinstein (case in point his extraordinarily beautiful wife), willingly put up with whatever they had to do and exchange for their own status and power, and then jumped on the bandwagon and complained only after everyone else talked about it. I don't buy the narrative that they were all forced into it

Andrew Huberman is the same type of guy.

But there are shades of it all around – probably lots of DC law firm partners or high earning cardiologists who have the same types of relationships behind closed doors.

[Anonymous]

He’s quite good looking, as podcasters and scientists go. I certainly have never met a male scientist who looks like him.

[Anonymous]

This is so strange. I literally have never heard of this guy until today when I saw his podcast recommended on another forum. I Googled him to see what the podcast was about and found the expose. So I guess I won't be adding that one to my library!

[Anonymous]

Does he have an extensive academic publication history? If so, I bet there's lots of holes in his data and conclusions. Would be interesting if anyone tried to replicate his work.

A fraud like this probably also committed academic fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He’s quite good looking, as podcasters and scientists go. I certainly have never met a male scientist who looks like him.

Have you met many scientists? Lots of them are good looking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I tried listening to him a few times but found his podcast quite boring.

I enjoyed the expose, it's fascinating to get a peak into the unbelievable lives of some people. And while he's an amazingly huge jerk, and a hypocrite whose body at his age was created by more than supplements, working out, and healthy eating, I felt like the story was missing the agency of the women. The one woman that it focused on primarily only had about a gazillion red flags flying right in front of her face, yet she continued to shape her life around this a-hole and take his nonsense. The women are glowingly described as "beautiful, successful, educated" yet they all freely decided as adults to be with this egotistical, controlling man.

To me it highlighted less about Huberman, and more that there's no shortage of women who are desperate to stay with these men after they show who they truly are.

Yes, I agree with you. I'm a feminist but I think it's an untold side of the whole metoo movement. That women seem so primally driven to pursue men with power and status that they will put up with (or even enjoy) a lot – cheating, humiliation, debasement. In this case, these women probably had a lot of clues about him, but were willing to deal with it. After the fact, they gripe and complain, but something doesn't ring true.

Look at the hundreds of women who put up with Harvey Weinstein (case in point his extraordinarily beautiful wife), willingly put up with whatever they had to do and exchange for their own status and power, and then jumped on the bandwagon and complained only after everyone else talked about it. I don't buy the narrative that they were all forced into it

Andrew Huberman is the same type of guy.

But there are shades of it all around – probably lots of DC law firm partners or high earning cardiologists who have the same types of relationships behind closed doors.

LOL, you are definitely not.

[Anonymous]

^^ You are not a feminist in the least when you skewer women for falling for narcissists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does he have an extensive academic publication history? If so, I bet there's lots of holes in his data and conclusions. Would be interesting if anyone tried to replicate his work.

A fraud like this probably also committed academic fraud.

Hahahaha, as if those with extensive academic publications don't commit academic fraud.

https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/allegations-research-misconduct-roil-dana-farber-cancer-institute-rcna135521