Sure, it wasn't stellar. It was "fairly average." And after a decade of the DeVos family and GOP monkeying around trying to make a profit off the public education system, it has fallen to the bottom. I think a decade with disastrous results is plenty long for us to see "how this really affects the system" - in other words, her ideas suck. |
They are accountable to the parents of students and also during school board elections. |
They're directly accountable to public officials, FFS! |
Yes, thought that was too obvious. Public officials are elected so if they are the other party; it is dismissed as part of the problem. |
Part of the problem is that people like you don't understand what you're talking about, PP. This is not a fight between Republicans and Dems. In fact, many prominent Dems promote charter schools (e.g., Cory Booker). Washington DC is run exclusively by Dems, but it has plenty of charter schools. |
In Michigan it was a Republican governor who sold out. And now it is the Republican led Department of Education that is pushing it. Yes, some Democrats promote charter schools. But they support highly regulated, non-profit charter schools, unlike the Republicans who are pushing this agenda. |
This is not only a Republican/Democrat issue...nor is it solely about greed. The transfer of public education to local control was a response to school integration. We never have really had a national policy to integrate residential neighborhoods, so by transferring more and more control to local school districts you could ensure the rich (and predominately white) neighborhoods got excellent schooling while the poorer ones did not. Remedies to this de facto segregation via bussing have been less common and in certain ways more controversial as Americans delude themselves into thinking the fact of the Obama presidency means we are no longer a racist country. Much of the dismantling of the strong Federal state is really about "States Rights", just in a different form. |
Oh, I see. Republicans support the BAD charter schools, while Democrats only support the GOOD charter schools. Got it. ![]() |
That tends to be how it works out. Republicans are in support of free markets, less regulation in education, which is for profit charters. Dems support tight regulation and non-profits. In fact, unregulated, for profit charter schools are usually bad. |
Well, do you or do you not agree that the for-profit charter schools have been a disaster in Michigan? Can you give an example of excellent for-profit charter schools in Michigan? |
So not all charter schools are bad? Only the ones that don't have Dem support? |
Detroit public schools are a mess and have been for years. They were not working. Charter schools may or may not be an improvement. |
Interesting. Does the article address Michigans changing demographics? Does it address the decades of decaying tax base as employers and young college educated kids left the state never to return. There are more factors at work in Michigan than just charter schools, though that's probably a step beyond what the Times can muster for journalistic integrity. |
I don't know - you tell me. Name some that have given excellent results that are not supported by Democrats. I personally am not a charter school booster but happy to have my opinion changed if you show me they work. |
But the shitty ones sign up anyone with a pulse -- thus, allowing nytimes to come in, cherry pick & declare it a failed experiment. |