Can't speak to the charters, but Peabody and CH Montessori over SWS? That's a real oversight, especially if you're interested in Reggio approach |
PP, why would you put SWS over Logan Montessori? |
I have heard the opposite. |
why would OP consider SWS? she's looking for PK-3.
as am i, so would love to keep the comments coming. |
OP here. And to 14:12, I can't consider SWS because it doesn't start until PK4, as 14:19 noted. Especially with the shuffle that's happening with the expansion, it might not even be an option next year.
What about Burroughs? Langdon? JO Wilson? Thoughts? |
SWS will be adding PK3 next year (in addition to 2nd grade). It may not be promoted by DCPS yet, but it will be soon |
No knock against Peabody or CHM -- both good programs. Mostly because the OP requested Reggio model. |
YY is the one school, OP should NOT bother applying. Prek4 is all in Mandarin, no English, not a good choice for 1 yr. |
Seriously? That would be great news! Can I ask your source, unofficially? |
I'm not PP, but I've seen this on MOTH (re: SWS adding preschool) |
The opposite of what? |
The opposite of which part? Powell? Barnard? Cooke? |
Yes -- seriously. Unofficially, I'm an SWS parent and its been directly communicated to the SWS community by the school. It's always been in the plans when SWS located to a permanent home which will now be PLC. There simply wasn't room at the Logan Annex for PK-3 as it would have required doubling the existing space to accomodate 2nd grade AND PK3 and would have been a logistical nightmare. PLC has capacity for over 350, but SWS currently maxes out at 2nd grade and project to that size in 4 years. PLC has plenty of space for PK3, even when it reaches 5th grade. |
Sorry to be dense, what is PLC? |
Prospect Learning Center. That school is closing and SWS will be relocating there.
|