Trump's Fake Elector scheme just got worse: Proof of conspiracy
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| Michigan is charging the 16 phony electors! |
Anonymous
| Michigan is charging the 16 phony electors! |
Anonymous
|
https://apnews.com/article/fake-elector-michigan-republican-df7803fca3862be713d9d6d29fb77e81 This is turning into a very hot summer indeed. |
Anonymous
| It’s been quite a busy day! |
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
|
That’s the worst part - these old f#cks felt entitled to disenfranchising the rest of the state and younger generations who will need to clean up the mess they made. The ego and narcissism of these people is unreal. |
Anonymous
Anonymous
+1 and also important to note that Trump lost Michigan by more than 150,000 votes/ three points. It was not close. |
Anonymous
|
Didn't the democrats call for electors to choose Clinton in 2016?
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1681458308358737920?s=20 "THREAD: In 2016, Democrats, Hollywood celebrities, and corporate news outlets urged electors to vote against President-elect Donald Trump. Lawrence Lessig's article in The Washington Post on November 26, 2016, argued that Republican electors had the constitutional right and duty to switch their votes from Trump to Hillary Clinton. This sparked a movement supported by figures like Michael Moore, John Podesta, Keith Olbermann, Rosie O'Donnell, and several Hollywood celebrities. While they only convinced a few electors, it's important to recognize the double standard of justice in the treatment of Democrats and Republicans when objecting to elections." |
Anonymous
Some states have passed laws requiring electors to vote with their party while others haven't. In those states, electors can do what they feel is best. Either way, this applies to real electors, not fake ones. I'm explaining this for any middle school civics student that runs across this post and would benefit from the clarification. |