+1. Empty classrooms they call fill with naive pre-k families. Better than empty seats. |
Overwhelming majority of families are not considering SH, EH, etc.. The 3 CH middles are not acceptable. You have to be joking. Neither is MacFarland, CHEC or whatever. You can absolutely lower your standards and deal with poor academics and poorly performing peer groups in addition to behavior issues, bullying, fighting, etc…if you are so desperate to stay where you are. But many are not. It’s also wishful thinking to think all these schools are miraculously going to get better all over EOTP. It’s not. One thing you are right is that high school is hard. But it’s a big mistake to get shut out of high school and move then when you could have done it in 5th and given your kid a much better middle school experience academically, socially, extracurriculars, in addition to establishing more friendships easier on then moving in high school. Lastly, your kid will also be much better prepared for high school. The dirty little secret SH families don’t tell you is how much they are supplementing. There is no way I’m interested in trying to supplement everything in middle school. |
I’m surprised that Takoma had to accept more pre-k 3 than they wanted because as an early action school they need to accept all in bound preK applicants. I wonder if they will lose early action status at some point? |
That's not what the MV letter says though. So which is it? Also - the current 4th grade class at LAMB definitely has more than 50 kids right now (and only 50 spots). The numbers are close enough that it will be fine for the LAMB families - a few kids will go to BASIS or Latin, and some of them might not continue to DCI for other reasons, but it's foolish for families at other schools to count on the "LAMB spots" to help make up any difference. It's going to be a couple of spots that LAMB has "available" to share with other feeder schools. |
Can you imagine suffering through MV in hopes of solving MS and HS only to be shut out? I'd be in therapy for years trying to deal with what I did to my kid. |
Says someone who knows absolutely nothing about MV. P 3rd grade had issues last year but things are good otherwise. We are at 8th St and having a great year and my kid is doing great socially and academically. Good luck with Cardozo or whatever…… |
Right, just one year in one grade at one campus. Everything else is totally perfect! Nothing to see here! Open your eyes. And good luck when you don't get a spot at DCI. |
What about MacArthur HS? |
It's MSDC and DCI, not MV, since they are the ones applying the preference to their applicants. But I don't see where it says that in the letter, unless I'm missing something? For 2025-26 school year, we anticipate approximately 100 Mundo Verde 5th graders/rising 6th graders expressing interest in DCI, while we have only 70 allocated spots. The allocation of those 70 spots will be done through the My School DC DCI Member Lottery. That lottery has a sibling preference, so that families with a sibling already at DCI will get preference. I see two things here. First, they're not saying there will be 100 total kids, they're saying they anticipate 100 kids applying to DCI. Above they say that 85-90% of fifth graders choose DCI, so presumably their anticipated 100 kids is 85-90% of the actual number of fifth graders that year. That means that families shouldn't count on the odds being slightly better because some kids will go elsewhere because the numbers they offer already include that attrition. Second, it only says families with a sibling already at DCI, not already at DCI OR a feeder school. Looking at the Tableau site, it looks like that preference applied in 23-24 (with 19 sibling attending, 21 sibling attending across LEA, and 26 no preference) but not in 24-25 (with only 8 sibling attending and 46 no preference). That 8 is odd because prior years had 19, 29, 17 siblings attending. Maybe because 24-25 was the first expansion year and there was a large influx of new families? I'm not going back in the MV data to count backwards, but I'm guessing that's a fluke and will go back to the prior averages next year or in a few years after the first expansion classes get through. |
PP said a few pages back that McKinley was a typo and they meant to say MacArthur. |
Nope multiple classes, multiple years, in addition to talking to parents in other grades. The 1st year back post pandemic was rough like everywhere else but things have stabilized. You must not have taken a stats class. Chance of going to our IB school is 0. Chance of getting into DCI significantly higher 60-80%. I’ll circle back to you when we are there. BTW, no need to move to Deal. DCI has a good cohort of IB Deal families who are happy they made the choice and trajectory is upwards. |
Thanks! I'm PP you are responding to and I misunderstood what you meant by "sibling feeder preference" does not apply to 6th grade. We are saying the same thing (I think) which is that younger siblings with older siblings at DCI will still have a guarantee and that oldest children/only children will have to lottery for remaining spots. I was reading "sibling feeder preference" to mean "have a sibling at DCI and are at a feeder school to DCI," but I see now that you meant it as "have a sibling at a DCI feeder school and are at a DCI feeder school." |
Oh honey. They have done such a great job keeping the Calle Ocho parents happy. But believe me, the problems at Cook are longstanding and entrenched. So bad that the Padres organization lost all its leaders and folded for a year or so. So bad that despite living in Bloomingdale and having elementary age children, I don't know anyone who goes to Cook after ECE. I do know a lot of elementary age kids who have left, though. Why do you think 60-80%? Are you again believing what you're told by the administration? |
NP. Your obsession with this school is pathetic. You keep repeating the same Stuff over and over again and it is clear that you have no experience with the school. Get a hobby! |
With which of my statements do you disagree? |