EVERY Six Months Jolie reiterates accusations against Pitt

Anonymous
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13277719/Brads-history-physical-abuse-Angelina-court-papers-claims-Pitt-clashed-children-fight-private-jet-ALISON-BOSHOFF.html

Every six months she brings up the accusation of abuse. Discrediting him hasn’t worked with this or his cheating on Aniston. When will she realize she can’t hurt him?
Anonymous
All I ever remember about her is some of the crazy stuff she did in her 20s before she got a good publicist. I doubt the person has changed since then...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:All I ever remember about her is some of the crazy stuff she did in her 20s before she got a good publicist. I doubt the person has changed since then...


Making out with her brother and the vial of Billy Bob Thornton’s blood around her neck…who she started screwing while he was engaged to Laura Dern. She was a completely, totally different character. It’s hard to take anything she does seriously.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13277719/Brads-history-physical-abuse-Angelina-court-papers-claims-Pitt-clashed-children-fight-private-jet-ALISON-BOSHOFF.html

Every six months she brings up the accusation of abuse. Discrediting him hasn’t worked with this or his cheating on Aniston. When will she realize she can’t hurt him?

Am guessing that’s just how she gets attention. Ignore her. She’s behaves like a child.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All I ever remember about her is some of the crazy stuff she did in her 20s before she got a good publicist. I doubt the person has changed since then...


Making out with her brother and the vial of Billy Bob Thornton’s blood around her neck…who she started screwing while he was engaged to Laura Dern. She was a completely, totally different character. It’s hard to take anything she does seriously.


Agree. This is all I remember about her too.

PP you must be in my age range 48-54
Anonymous
And it's neither material nor relevant to the allegations about the sale of their estate in France. Baffling why her lawyer goes along with this crap.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:And it's neither material nor relevant to the allegations about the sale of their estate in France. Baffling why her lawyer goes along with this crap.


It is relevant because he originally left their deal because of things she filed in family court. The judge allowed her to provide evidence from their custody case during their demurrer because of it. The allegations aren't new. They were just sealed.

He dragged the custody case into the winery negotiations which opened the door for her to give those details. It's going to get messy.

My DH is retired but likes to follow cases still. This email from her lawyer was the catalyst.

https://ibb.co/nsJXLRS
https://ibb.co/6Xrgv9V
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And it's neither material nor relevant to the allegations about the sale of their estate in France. Baffling why her lawyer goes along with this crap.


It is relevant because he originally left their deal because of things she filed in family court. The judge allowed her to provide evidence from their custody case during their demurrer because of it. The allegations aren't new. They were just sealed.

He dragged the custody case into the winery negotiations which opened the door for her to give those details. It's going to get messy.

My DH is retired but likes to follow cases still. This email from her lawyer was the catalyst.

https://ibb.co/nsJXLRS
https://ibb.co/6Xrgv9V



Neither settlement negotiations nor attorney communications are factually relevant.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And it's neither material nor relevant to the allegations about the sale of their estate in France. Baffling why her lawyer goes along with this crap.


It is relevant because he originally left their deal because of things she filed in family court. The judge allowed her to provide evidence from their custody case during their demurrer because of it. The allegations aren't new. They were just sealed.

He dragged the custody case into the winery negotiations which opened the door for her to give those details. It's going to get messy.

My DH is retired but likes to follow cases still. This email from her lawyer was the catalyst.

https://ibb.co/nsJXLRS
https://ibb.co/6Xrgv9V



Neither settlement negotiations nor attorney communications are factually relevant.


One of his claims is that she improperly started looking at third parties while they were still negotiating. The negotiations about the winery deal between Brad, Angelina, and his partner Perrin then are relevant and why it broke down are relevant. He tried to strike her portions about the custody but was denied.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:And it's neither material nor relevant to the allegations about the sale of their estate in France. Baffling why her lawyer goes along with this crap.


It is relevant because he originally left their deal because of things she filed in family court. The judge allowed her to provide evidence from their custody case during their demurrer because of it. The allegations aren't new. They were just sealed.

He dragged the custody case into the winery negotiations which opened the door for her to give those details. It's going to get messy.

My DH is retired but likes to follow cases still. This email from her lawyer was the catalyst.

https://ibb.co/nsJXLRS
https://ibb.co/6Xrgv9V



Neither settlement negotiations nor attorney communications are factually relevant.


Sales negotiations are not necessarily settlement negotiations. Here, it doesn’t look like those letters discussing sales was in the context of dismissing a lawsuit or any legal claims, just negotiations in forming a contract for the sale of property. The lawsuits look to have come after these negotiations. So…would definitely be factually relevant.
Anonymous
She is an attention seeker.
Anonymous
I bet they’ve spent millions on attorney fees.

My guess is she’s done a bang up job alienating those children from him, and at the same time he was a terrible dad and bad partner. Poor kids, they are pawns. Hope she grows up soon.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I bet they’ve spent millions on attorney fees.

My guess is she’s done a bang up job alienating those children from him, and at the same time he was a terrible dad and bad partner. Poor kids, they are pawns. Hope she grows up soon.


tbh i think am changing my mind about her alienating them some. people are posting the court docs on twitter and she wasn't against joint custody for all the kids. some of them didn't want be around him very much and some wanted to contuine their therapy progam with him. She was gunning for each kid to have their own parenting plan tailored to them which I don't think is unreasonable. He asked for the same parenting amount for all or sole custody if the all kids weren't going to bond with him. I see both POV's but I think the older kids were 17, 15 or 16 at this point. Forcing them is just going to make it worse. I am assuming this move is why Zahara no longer talks to him and that makes me sad and why Pax got so mad at him. Very sad case
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-13277719/Brads-history-physical-abuse-Angelina-court-papers-claims-Pitt-clashed-children-fight-private-jet-ALISON-BOSHOFF.html

Every six months she brings up the accusation of abuse. Discrediting him hasn’t worked with this or his cheating on Aniston. When will she realize she can’t hurt him?


What does it say about us that this druggie womanizing adulterous wife and child abuser is still so popular?

Oh wait nevermind - tons of them in 100 years of movies and we never let it bother us.

If I had a partner who turned out to be abusive to me and my kids, I'd be angry about it and never let it go either. Brad Pitt is scum and Jolie has every right to be angry and not to want to let anyone forget who he is.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:All I ever remember about her is some of the crazy stuff she did in her 20s before she got a good publicist. I doubt the person has changed since then...


This.

Given what we know about Angelina and her very public behavior ever since she hit the scene and for many years before she got with Brad, doesn’t everyone think the following is what really happened:

She was sexy, crazy fun when they met…but not too crazy.

They had a good run for a while…lots of passion.

Then their lives became stressful given the chaos of kids. Less sexy. And the passion tilted to stress-induced emotional outbursts…by Angie.

“You don’t love me anymore! You never take me anywhere! Are you in love with your costar?”

Yes, she went crazy. No more sex, just outbursts. And knowing what we know about her health, you know hormones were involved…and many of us know what that does to our mood, temper, self-control.

She became a shrew. He drank to escape.

And she’s the kind of monster who pushes someone until they snap.

I bet she throws things. I bet she instigates. And she clearly cannot let anything go.

Brad is not an abusive monster who was a danger to his kids.

She is the monster who alienated affection and won’t let it go even though he has given up.

I bet his bio kids will reach out to him as soon as they can break free.

She is nuts and will never let it go.
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: