Again, its all about the defense. Disgusting. Victim's mother couldn't even complete her statement w/o defense playing the victim. |
I don't know but insurance companies seem to cover people with several DUIs though they seem to be continued threat so who knows, he only has one accident on record. I was against him getting a harsh sentence but totally agree with for losing driving privilege. |
Why would a middle age mother having an emotional breakdown seeing their child going to prison has to be a defense strategy? Don't make assumptions. She isn't on trial. |
Will court resume today for the sentence? How soon can they appeal? This case seems drawn out. Or maybe not. I feel so bad for the victims and their families. I hope they one day can find peace. Unfortunately the death of child is the worst pain any parent can go through. |
Yes, it resumes today. Presumably the jury will finish so they don’t have to show up Monday. Shahid can appeal promptly but I’m not aware of any basis for reversing the verdict. He’ll likely attack the judge’s decision to admit the learner’s permit into evidence, but that’s almost certainly not going anywhere. |
This is the person who let him drive the car and suggested he not take the plea deal. She doesn't live in reality. |
She's also goingto be named in the civil suits since they bought the car. She probably passed out realizing she'll be broke af for the rest of her life. |
There has to be some sort of liability on the parents when they knowingly allowed an unauthorized driver. He only has a permit to drive the car. Sorry but these parents are criminals as well. |
He claimed during his sentencing statement that his parents did not know he took the car. I believe this eliminates their exposure and I'm sure Greenspun advised him to make this statement under oath for that purpose. |
He was 18, which is a legal adult. |
Im not so sure this will indemnify them. They should have been more careful with the keys. Where were they when he took it? Had he ever taken it before? |
The car was purchased 4 days prior to the crash and still had 30 day tag on it. So not sure that there is much history to go by. |
What the parents did isn't criminal, but it's no doubt going to be the subject of the civil litigation. If they let him drive the car without someone over 21 accompanying him, as required by a learner's permit, they'd probably be liable for the damage he caused. Someone said he testified yesterday he drove the car without their knowledge--he was likely instructed to testify that by his lawyer in anticipation of the civil litigation. If, however, his parents bought him the car and gave it to him as a gift, then one might say they were implicitly allowing him to drive it without being licensed. The police reports could end up playing a big role; did he tell the police it was his parents' car or did he say he just got it as a gift? |
I guarantee this isn’t the first time he took the car out. His parents were well aware he was driving it. How do they not notice the car is missing. |
He had probably been driving the parents' other cars without supervision. It's unlikely that this was the first time he took the car or the first time he gunned any car that fast . Heck, when my kids were learning to drive, they didn't even know which streets were which. They had very little confidence.
This guy (Shahid) acted like he knew that area well and drove it like he owned the road....that seems like someone who has been driving by himself (unsupervised) before. |