2024 Senate Elections

[Anonymous]

May as well kick this off...

[Anonymous]

A lot of good potential candidates for this race

[Anonymous]

I have to think that Elissa Slotkin will be thinking about Stabenow’s Senate seat. The state might be easier for her to win than her district.

And I think it might be Whitmer’s if she wants it.

[Anonymous]

Figure the democrats lose Montana and Ohio. There don't seem to be any possible pick ups, so long Senate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Figure the democrats lose Montana and Ohio. There don't seem to be any possible pick ups, so long Senate

Why Ohio? Is Brown not running for re-election. He is well liked in Ohio, as he brings a lot of money to that state.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Figure the democrats lose Montana and Ohio. There don't seem to be any possible pick ups, so long Senate

Why Ohio? Is Brown not running for re-election. He is well liked in Ohio, as he brings a lot of money to that state.

Because Ohio moves further to the red every election. We just saw a great candidate loose to someone almost as flawed as Hershel Walker. The republicans ran a candidate who supported spousal abuse and they won.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Figure the democrats lose Montana and Ohio. There don't seem to be any possible pick ups, so long Senate

Why Ohio? Is Brown not running for re-election. He is well liked in Ohio, as he brings a lot of money to that state.

Because Ohio moves further to the red every election. We just saw a great candidate loose to someone almost as flawed as Hershel Walker. The republicans ran a candidate who supported spousal abuse and they won.

You underestimate how much goodwill and incumbency advantage Sherrod Brown has

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Figure the democrats lose Montana and Ohio. There don't seem to be any possible pick ups, so long Senate

Why Ohio? Is Brown not running for re-election. He is well liked in Ohio, as he brings a lot of money to that state.

Because Ohio moves further to the red every election. We just saw a great candidate loose to someone almost as flawed as Hershel Walker. The republicans ran a candidate who supported spousal abuse and they won.

You underestimate how much goodwill and incumbency advantage Sherrod Brown has

If not him than Manchin in WV (a +40 republican state, so as popular as he is, he's still vulnerable), Nevada (a very purple state), Sinema in Arizona (is there a more unpopular senator), not to mention Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. Surely the republicans get 1 of those in addition to Montana. Meanwhile, democrats will be trying to flip Texas and Florida?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Figure the democrats lose Montana and Ohio. There don't seem to be any possible pick ups, so long Senate

Why Ohio? Is Brown not running for re-election. He is well liked in Ohio, as he brings a lot of money to that state.

Because Ohio moves further to the red every election. We just saw a great candidate loose to someone almost as flawed as Hershel Walker. The republicans ran a candidate who supported spousal abuse and they won.

You underestimate how much goodwill and incumbency advantage Sherrod Brown has

If not him than Manchin in WV (a +40 republican state, so as popular as he is, he's still vulnerable), Nevada (a very purple state), Sinema in Arizona (is there a more unpopular senator), not to mention Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. Surely the republicans get 1 of those in addition to Montana. Meanwhile, democrats will be trying to flip Texas and Florida?

Is Beto going to run again, LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have to think that Elissa Slotkin will be thinking about Stabenow’s Senate seat. The state might be easier for her to win than her district.

And I think it might be Whitmer’s if she wants it.

I want to see slotkin vs tlaib primary

AIPAC vs Palestine

🍿 🍿

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Figure the democrats lose Montana and Ohio. There don't seem to be any possible pick ups, so long Senate

Why Ohio? Is Brown not running for re-election. He is well liked in Ohio, as he brings a lot of money to that state.

Because Ohio moves further to the red every election. We just saw a great candidate loose to someone almost as flawed as Hershel Walker. The republicans ran a candidate who supported spousal abuse and they won.

Ohio is not as red as ppl make it out to be and as PPs have said, you underestimate Browns popularity. Oh, and contrary to what Never Trumpers claim, Tim Ryan ran a so-so campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have to think that Elissa Slotkin will be thinking about Stabenow’s Senate seat. The state might be easier for her to win than her district.

And I think it might be Whitmer’s if she wants it.

I want to see slotkin vs tlaib primary

AIPAC vs Palestine

🍿 🍿

Tlaib wouldn't run for this seat, so you won't get your twisted wish.

[Anonymous]

Indiana’s Senate seat is also open since Mike Braun announced he’s running for Governor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Figure the democrats lose Montana and Ohio. There don't seem to be any possible pick ups, so long Senate

Why Ohio? Is Brown not running for re-election. He is well liked in Ohio, as he brings a lot of money to that state.

Because Ohio moves further to the red every election. We just saw a great candidate loose to someone almost as flawed as Hershel Walker. The republicans ran a candidate who supported spousal abuse and they won.

Ohio is not as red as ppl make it out to be and as PPs have said, you underestimate Browns popularity. Oh, and contrary to what Never Trumpers claim, Tim Ryan ran a so-so campaign.

That's fine. Call Ohio D, MT R, and you still have Ds defending a half dozen races that are at best toss ups while hoping to pick up one of two long shots

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Figure the democrats lose Montana and Ohio. There don't seem to be any possible pick ups, so long Senate

Why Ohio? Is Brown not running for re-election. He is well liked in Ohio, as he brings a lot of money to that state.

Because Ohio moves further to the red every election. We just saw a great candidate loose to someone almost as flawed as Hershel Walker. The republicans ran a candidate who supported spousal abuse and they won.

Ohio is not as red as ppl make it out to be and as PPs have said, you underestimate Browns popularity. Oh, and contrary to what Never Trumpers claim, Tim Ryan ran a so-so campaign.

Did he? I hadn’t heard that about Tim Ryan. I did hear that JD Vance ran a pretty awful campaign and disappeared for the summer. But with Peter Thiel’s billions behind him, so many things became possible