Tell me about St Andrews in Scotland

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm always a little concerned when I see parents thinking of sending their children to universities abroad. It is a long-term commitment. The best universities in America offer arguably the best undergraduate education, and at least for job prospects (particularly in North America), a U.S. degree will get you farther. I know it's not popular to say these kinds of things (I feel like I need to say that I am not remotely near a MAGA head), but I feel like it warrants mention.

College is half about personal growth. Going to school abroad gets kids out of their comfort zone and exposes them to so much more.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm always a little concerned when I see parents thinking of sending their children to universities abroad. It is a long-term commitment. The best universities in America offer arguably the best undergraduate education, and at least for job prospects (particularly in North America), a U.S. degree will get you farther. I know it's not popular to say these kinds of things (I feel like I need to say that I am not remotely near a MAGA head), but I feel like it warrants mention.


So having worked in academia and studied in both UK and US institutions, I couldn't disagree more. I think the rigor of UK institutions, particularly the better ones (in which I would include St. Andrews, though it is certainly not at the level of Cambridge for most subjects), is much higher at the undergraduate level. Grade inflation, money, and the importance of student evaluations of teachers have really undermined quality control in the US. For graduate degrees, it is a different story and more nuanced. You will emerge from a top UK University with more intellectual discipline.

As for job prospects, that is a very complicated question. You do lose the advantage of the large network a US university can offer. But for many internationally-focused jobs a foreign degree is not a problem. And for many professions nowadays, especially in the DC area, you will need a graduate qualification in any case, and a UK undergrad is no disadvantage in getting in, and a huge advantage in handling the requirements, of a US graduate school.

Yes, there is a risk that they will stay in Europe. But then there is a risk that if they study in the US they will move to the West Coast, which is not much closer than the UK.


I agree. My kid who has studied abroad has faced tougher courses and brutal grading, but is much more independent than the one who studied at a US university, where there is much more hand holding.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did my masters there in International Relations. Great program and close knit student body. It is a small town and the university community is even smaller so that works for some but not for others. Good number of Americans there and other international students— I left with good friends all over the world. As an American you can fit in anywhere (ie the class divide there between the British students is quite real, which was very different for me, but Americans can slot in anywhere). I enjoyed the more in depth study of material versus the more broad American system. Would definitely recommend visiting to get a feel given the small size of the town.


To add on to my post above, social life is very different than US universities— ie dinner parties, bars, and charity balls versus house parties with kegs. One is not better than the other— just different.


I read about this being true even at the college level when my son applied to the joint degree program at W&M. Kids live in apartments. Less class time than in US. Grades based on end of semester papers. And kids socialize at pubs.


My American DD is a student at another university in Scotland in a town that is even smaller than St Andrews, and all of the above is pretty accurate. I obviously can't speak to the St Andrews experience, but her uni experience so far has been a lot different than what it would have been in the US. No closed off campus, most students living in apartments (with dorms for the first years, but you'll always have your own room). Social life on the weekends revolves around going to pubs & having friends over for small house or dinner parties. The school puts on ceilis - social gatherings with traditional Scottish music/dancing - that a lot of the student body goes to. Everyone knows each other, so it's a tight knit program. There's not really much in terms of clubs or student organizations, and there's less time in the classroom (and much less busy work). More self-advocacy required on the part of students.

From what I'm reading here, St Andrews seems to cater a tiny bit more to the "American style" of higher ed. But my DD has loved her time studying in Scotland.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I had a friend that went, and ended up transferring out after the first year because she under-estimated how much the short days during most of the school year would affect her. She just found it very dark and depressing. She transferred into a school in New England, which is still cold, but just found the longer days really helpful.

So maybe send them with one of those lights for SAD and a bottle of Vitamin D pills? I think this had just not at all occurred to my friend, and she was unprepared for the physical effects of changing latitude that way.


There are a lot of kids who struggle to adapt to US colleges too, and transfer or drop out. There could be many reasons she had problems besides the daylight hours - change of culture, living alone, homesickness, academic issues, depression, loneliness....


Totally agree, but she ended up going to a college in New England that was also thousands of miles from home, where she knew no one (as a transfer student), and which was culturally very different from her home town, and was fine there. I'm not saying don't do it -- but just recognize that they get at least a couple of hours a day less sunlight than we do in the winter and that kids arrive there in the fall when the days get shorter quickly. If they are not anticipating that, it can be rough. I did a study abroad in another Northern country, and many people recommended doing spring semester instead of fall, because you are arriving with excitement at the darkest part of the year, and then the days get longer, rather than the reverse.
Anonymous
My kid is a vampire and stays awake all night and gets up late. I'm not sure how much daylight hours matter to this age group.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did my masters there in International Relations. Great program and close knit student body. It is a small town and the university community is even smaller so that works for some but not for others. Good number of Americans there and other international students— I left with good friends all over the world. As an American you can fit in anywhere (ie the class divide there between the British students is quite real, which was very different for me, but Americans can slot in anywhere). I enjoyed the more in depth study of material versus the more broad American system. Would definitely recommend visiting to get a feel given the small size of the town.


To add on to my post above, social life is very different than US universities— ie dinner parties, bars, and charity balls versus house parties with kegs. One is not better than the other— just different.


I read about this being true even at the college level when my son applied to the joint degree program at W&M. Kids live in apartments. Less class time than in US. Grades based on end of semester papers. And kids socialize at pubs.


My American DD is a student at another university in Scotland in a town that is even smaller than St Andrews, and all of the above is pretty accurate. I obviously can't speak to the St Andrews experience, but her uni experience so far has been a lot different than what it would have been in the US. No closed off campus, most students living in apartments (with dorms for the first years, but you'll always have your own room). Social life on the weekends revolves around going to pubs & having friends over for small house or dinner parties. The school puts on ceilis - social gatherings with traditional Scottish music/dancing - that a lot of the student body goes to. Everyone knows each other, so it's a tight knit program. There's not really much in terms of clubs or student organizations, and there's less time in the classroom (and much less busy work). More self-advocacy required on the part of students.

From what I'm reading here, St Andrews seems to cater a tiny bit more to the "American style" of higher ed. But my DD has loved her time studying in Scotland.


Which university? Is there one in a town smaller than St A?
Anonymous
"I think the rigor of UK institutions, particularly the better ones (in which I would include St. Andrews, though it is certainly not at the level of Cambridge for most subjects), is much higher at the undergraduate level. Grade inflation, money, and the importance of student evaluations of teachers have really undermined quality control in the US."

++ This. St Andrews grads will definitely have more mastery. And subjects have an intellectual focus. IR at st andrews is not "international studies" or "international service" where it is broad 'international stuff' or a vocational focus, St Andrews teaches the academic discipline of IR, which is different.

"You do lose the advantage of the large network a US university can offer. But for many internationally-focused jobs a foreign degree is not a problem. And for many professions nowadays, especially in the DC area, you will need a graduate qualification in any case, and a UK undergrad is no disadvantage in getting in, and a huge advantage in handling the requirements, of a US graduate school."

++It is totally what you make it. There's obvious disadvantages, but the advantages are substantial too if you play to them. Know what you want to do.

"To add on to my post above, social life is very different than US universities— ie dinner parties, bars, and charity balls versus house parties with kegs. One is not better than the other— just different."

++This is true to a degree, there's still a fair amount of house parties and kegs, bar socialization, some semi-club establishments in town.


"I read about this being true even at the college level when my son applied to the joint degree program at W&M. Kids live in apartments. Less class time than in US. Grades based on end of semester papers. And kids socialize at pubs."

++It's not a good fit for a kid who can't be a bit independent. DS has grown up so much since St Andrews– in a good way. The academics mandate lots of independent learning. You can fly just above passing grades, or you can deeply engage alot more: there are opportunities for both. There are dorms which play an important role in social life, but yes, most move to apartments after first year.
Anonymous
How about Edinburgh?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Did my masters there in International Relations. Great program and close knit student body. It is a small town and the university community is even smaller so that works for some but not for others. Good number of Americans there and other international students— I left with good friends all over the world. As an American you can fit in anywhere (ie the class divide there between the British students is quite real, which was very different for me, but Americans can slot in anywhere). I enjoyed the more in depth study of material versus the more broad American system. Would definitely recommend visiting to get a feel given the small size of the town.


To add on to my post above, social life is very different than US universities— ie dinner parties, bars, and charity balls versus house parties with kegs. One is not better than the other— just different.


I was going to comment. There's lots of drinking in the UK, and the drinking age is lower.


It is true there is a lot of drinking, but it is social, so people talk they don't play drinking games for lack of conversational skills and there is zero "hazing" which is just not a thing in the UK, thankfully.
Anonymous
If you have a family plaid, you can wear your own kilt u dear your robes at graduations a friend sent her adult child there for graduate work so I got to see the kilt.
Anonymous
St Andrews is a good school. Probably would be around T50 - T75 if it were in the States, for some context.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:St Andrews is a good school. Probably would be around T50 - T75 if it were in the States, for some context.


top 10 SLACs
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:St Andrews is a good school. Probably would be around T50 - T75 if it were in the States, for some context.


top 10 SLACs


No, it's a university. And as a university, it would probably be competitive with the universities ranked around T50-T75 in America, for context.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:St Andrews is a good school. Probably would be around T50 - T75 if it were in the States, for some context.


top 10 SLACs


No, it's a university. And as a university, it would probably be competitive with the universities ranked around T50-T75 in America, for context.


Er no, its a tiny university. There are no "liberal arts colleges" in the UK. There are Art Schools like the Royal College of Art and there are Drama Schools like RADA but not any LACs whatsoever.

But there are huge universities - like Manchester and tiny ones, like St. Andrews, hence the very accurate comparison.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:St Andrews is a good school. Probably would be around T50 - T75 if it were in the States, for some context.


top 10 SLACs


No, it's a university. And as a university, it would probably be competitive with the universities ranked around T50-T75 in America, for context.


Er no, its a tiny university. There are no "liberal arts colleges" in the UK. There are Art Schools like the Royal College of Art and there are Drama Schools like RADA but not any LACs whatsoever.

But there are huge universities - like Manchester and tiny ones, like St. Andrews, hence the very accurate comparison.

St. Andrews has ~7000 undergraduates; I wouldn't call it "tiny." That's roughly the same as schools like Brown, UChicago, Stanford, Harvard, William & Mary, Tulane etc. and no one really considers those schools "tiny."
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: