Anonymous wrote:the woman who has had 2 brain tumors (stop saying rumors, it's very insulting) and just finished surgery and then radiation for them (and I'm really sorry to that poster, that must be horrible!)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've never met a smoker who didn't smell, so no to the nanny. Unless you smoke one cigarette a month, there will be residual smell of smoke. My father is a lifelong smoker. Let me tell you, I can tell how long ago he left the room when I enter that room. I can tell how long ago he used the bathroom when I go use it. They smell, their body fluids smell, their clothes, hair, sweat, everything. Perhaps there are smokers out there who never carry a molecule of smell around them but I never met one.
You do realize that you have absolutely no way of knowing this without asking each and every non-smelling person you encounter if they are a smoker or not. I know it's fun to bash smokers but try not to be so stupid about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your focus on protecting smokers is odd to say the least. In light of your purported illness you may want to rethink your priorities. Secondly, you make think third hand smoke, which can harm children is trivial. Perhaps that what caused your rumors. It is anything but trivial. You and the smoking nannies should get together and let them focus on your children. I chose for non-smokers with compassion for the fragile respiratory statuses of children to take care of my children. Perhaps if your kids got a couple of rumors you'd change your grossly sympathetic tone. Unlikely. Trolls can't change colors.
![]()
![]()
![]()
What.
I have said multiple times that I would not hire a nanny who I knew smoked and that I believe if you can tell she does (i.e. You can smell it) you shouldn't hire her. Second and third hand smoke is dangerous, as is having one of your children's primary role models endorsing smoking.
BUT not everyone who smokes smokes often enough for others to tell. My boyfriend smokes one cigarette per night just before he showers - none of his clothes smell, he never smokes in his car, etc. Do I like it? No. Do I believe there are nannies out there who are professional enough to keep a cigarette habit secret from the families they work for? Yes. Is a couple of cigarettes a night enough to condemn someone to poor hospital care? No. What about everyone who enjoys too much red meat - whether they end up overweight or not - or who binge drinks on weekends or eats well but never exercises? No one is perfect and no one makes 100% healthy choices 100% of the time. To argue that their families and medical professionals will abandon them at the end of their life (or in a time of medical crisis) because of that is insane.
Anonymous wrote:Your focus on protecting smokers is odd to say the least. In light of your purported illness you may want to rethink your priorities. Secondly, you make think third hand smoke, which can harm children is trivial. Perhaps that what caused your rumors. It is anything but trivial. You and the smoking nannies should get together and let them focus on your children. I chose for non-smokers with compassion for the fragile respiratory statuses of children to take care of my children. Perhaps if your kids got a couple of rumors you'd change your grossly sympathetic tone. Unlikely. Trolls can't change colors.
Anonymous wrote:Your focus on protecting smokers is odd to say the least. In light of your purported illness you may want to rethink your priorities. Secondly, you make think third hand smoke, which can harm children is trivial. Perhaps that what caused your rumors. It is anything but trivial. You and the smoking nannies should get together and let them focus on your children. I chose for non-smokers with compassion for the fragile respiratory statuses of children to take care of my children. Perhaps if your kids got a couple of rumors you'd change your grossly sympathetic tone. Unlikely. Trolls can't change colors.