Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:10:14 doesn't know the law. Period.
Please refer to the actual law at:
https://www.osha.gov/pls/epub/wageindex.download?p_file=F8764/wh1057.pdf
Specifically the portion that states: "In discharging the joint obligation each employer may, of course, take credit toward minimum wage and overtime requirements for all
payments made to the employee by the other joint employer or employers."
You wanting the law to say a certain something isn't proof of anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It boils down to risk. Some of you like it. Others don't. Any smart advisor explains that to you. Many of you hear what you want to hear.
It actually doesn't, because the question "is nanny share a joint employment arrangement?" is a yes/no, it's not up to anyone's individual judgment. If your tax advisor states that this is a joint employment scenario, for me all speculation ends there.
Your tax advisor is obligated to obey the law, not create the law. So no, it's not up to him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It boils down to risk. Some of you like it. Others don't. Any smart advisor explains that to you. Many of you hear what you want to hear.
It actually doesn't, because the question "is nanny share a joint employment arrangement?" is a yes/no, it's not up to anyone's individual judgment. If your tax advisor states that this is a joint employment scenario, for me all speculation ends there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It boils down to risk. Some of you like it. Others don't. Any smart advisor explains that to you. Many of you hear what you want to hear.
It actually doesn't, because the question "is nanny share a joint employment arrangement?" is a yes/no, it's not up to anyone's individual judgment. If your tax advisor states that this is a joint employment scenario, for me all speculation ends there.
Anonymous wrote:It boils down to risk. Some of you like it. Others don't. Any smart advisor explains that to you. Many of you hear what you want to hear.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any of you share employers actually doing it?
...the "joint employment relationship", that is.
Anyone here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any of you share employers actually doing it?
...the "joint employment relationship", that is.