Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The parents simply wanted the very best nanny they could find. It so happened that the nanny they wanted, would be bringing her own child. The parents had no expectation of reducing my rates.

It turned out to be a beautiful two year long relationship, until they moved to Europe. "

So, you were a short term nanny whose family let you go because they moved to Europe.

How very...unbelievable.

Guess you weren't all that special.


Don't you have anything intelligent to share today?

Do you?

Your emotional development seems to have been disrupted during your adolescence. Did something happen to you?

Anonymous wrote:"The parents simply wanted the very best nanny they could find. It so happened that the nanny they wanted, would be bringing her own child. The parents had no expectation of reducing my rates.

It turned out to be a beautiful two year long relationship, until they moved to Europe. "

So, you were a short term nanny whose family let you go because they moved to Europe.

How very...unbelievable.

Guess you weren't all that special.


Don't you have anything intelligent to share today?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The parents simply wanted the very best nanny they could find. It so happened that the nanny they wanted, would be bringing her own child. The parents had no expectation of reducing my rates.

It turned out to be a beautiful two year long relationship, until they moved to Europe. "

So, you were a short term nanny whose family let you go because they moved to Europe.

How very...unbelievable.

Guess you weren't all that special.

Don't you have anything intelligent to share today?

If there were an intelligence bar to posting on DCUM, the nanny who hijacked this thread would be silent and we'd all be better off.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The parents simply wanted the very best nanny they could find. It so happened that the nanny they wanted, would be bringing her own child. The parents had no expectation of reducing my rates.

It turned out to be a beautiful two year long relationship, until they moved to Europe. "

So, you were a short term nanny whose family let you go because they moved to Europe.

How very...unbelievable.

Guess you weren't all that special.

Don't you have anything intelligent to share today?

Anonymous wrote:"The parents simply wanted the very best nanny they could find. It so happened that the nanny they wanted, would be bringing her own child. The parents had no expectation of reducing my rates.

It turned out to be a beautiful two year long relationship, until they moved to Europe. "

So, you were a short term nanny whose family let you go because they moved to Europe.

How very...unbelievable.

Guess you weren't all that special.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In just about every post where you called singleton children spoiled elitist, said they were begging for siblings and implied that MBs who hire nannies with children do it because they realize their poor unfortunate singleton children simply must have company of another child in order not to end up in a mental ward.

Stop being so defensive. Everyone is welcome to share their experiences and thoughts. If you have trouble with that, you have a problem here.

Anonymous wrote:In just about every post where you called singleton children spoiled elitist, said they were begging for siblings and implied that MBs who hire nannies with children do it because they realize their poor unfortunate singleton children simply must have company of another child in order not to end up in a mental ward.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Do you also pity the pediatric psychiatrist MB and her physician husband who hired the nanny with child in tow? As you may recall, it was certainly no bargain. They simply wanted the best for their child, and could afford it.

However excellent that nanny is, she would be better without her child in tow. If the couple wanted their child to have a sibling, they would have had one. If she was able to find a position that worked for her, great, but it doesn't mean she is a better nanny BECAUSE she brings her child. Parents who want company for their singleton have a variety of options of getting it. They don't need to effectively hire one who happens to be their nanny's child.

The parents simply wanted the very best nanny they could find. It so happened that the nanny they wanted, would be bringing her own child. The parents had no expectation of reducing my rates.

It turned out to be a beautiful two year long relationship, until they moved to Europe.

Your child didn't make you "the very best nanny". You just happened to have it. You'd be the same nanny without the child. Stop pretending otherwise.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Do you also pity the pediatric psychiatrist MB and her physician husband who hired the nanny with child in tow? As you may recall, it was certainly no bargain. They simply wanted the best for their child, and could afford it.

However excellent that nanny is, she would be better without her child in tow. If the couple wanted their child to have a sibling, they would have had one. If she was able to find a position that worked for her, great, but it doesn't mean she is a better nanny BECAUSE she brings her child. Parents who want company for their singleton have a variety of options of getting it. They don't need to effectively hire one who happens to be their nanny's child.

The parents simply wanted the very best nanny they could find. It so happened that the nanny they wanted, would be bringing her own child. The parents had no expectation of reducing my rates.

It turned out to be a beautiful two year long relationship, until they moved to Europe.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Do you also pity the pediatric psychiatrist MB and her physician husband who hired the nanny with child in tow? As you may recall, it was certainly no bargain. They simply wanted the best for their child, and could afford it.

However excellent that nanny is, she would be better without her child in tow. If the couple wanted their child to have a sibling, they would have had one. If she was able to find a position that worked for her, great, but it doesn't mean she is a better nanny BECAUSE she brings her child. Parents who want company for their singleton have a variety of options of getting it. They don't need to effectively hire one who happens to be their nanny's child.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Notable that the pediatric shrink is the OP's PAST employer. Would love to get her diagnosis based on her former nanny's posts on this board.

Do you have a point to make? Or are you limited to kindergarten bickering?

Anonymous wrote:Notable that the pediatric shrink is the OP's PAST employer. Would love to get her diagnosis based on her former nanny's posts on this board.