Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$1-2 per hour raise.
Lovely if you can start when you bring the baby home.
Really? An extra $1/hr for the care of an infant? Why bother?
Anonymous wrote:I am not a nanny but if I were and only received $1-$2 raise and my work load increased 100%. I would be waving, "Bye-bye."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Taking care of a newborn baby is the easiest of all nanny gigs. I would pay more for a nanny who takes care of a three-year old or four-year old, but I won't for an infant minder, because I know how ridiculously easy it is to take care of a baby vs a preschooler.
Newborns can't tell you if the nanny is not caring for the child properly or even abusing the child. 3 and 4 year olds can speak. Just because it's easy doesn't mean that you can hire someone subpar and cheap.
Agree. The naive poster never had a baby with reflux. She has no clue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Taking care of a newborn baby is the easiest of all nanny gigs. I would pay more for a nanny who takes care of a three-year old or four-year old, but I won't for an infant minder, because I know how ridiculously easy it is to take care of a baby vs a preschooler.
Newborns can't tell you if the nanny is not caring for the child properly or even abusing the child. 3 and 4 year olds can speak. Just because it's easy doesn't mean that you can hire someone subpar and cheap.
Agree. The naive poster never had a baby with reflux. She has no clue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Taking care of a newborn baby is the easiest of all nanny gigs. I would pay more for a nanny who takes care of a three-year old or four-year old, but I won't for an infant minder, because I know how ridiculously easy it is to take care of a baby vs a preschooler.
Newborns can't tell you if the nanny is not caring for the child properly or even abusing the child. 3 and 4 year olds can speak. Just because it's easy doesn't mean that you can hire someone subpar and cheap.
Anonymous wrote:Taking care of a newborn baby is the easiest of all nanny gigs. I would pay more for a nanny who takes care of a three-year old or four-year old, but I won't for an infant minder, because I know how ridiculously easy it is to take care of a baby vs a preschooler.
Anonymous wrote:I love a nanny who rants and raves how difficult her job is with napping babies are the most difficult 9 months and she mar get paid some made up 2 under 2 rate.
Then what's the 2 under 3 rate and 2 under 4 rate? Or better yet, what's the preschool rate?
You must love job hopping.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went from $16 to $20 when the second baby was born. I stayed. If I'd been at $20 to start I'd have expected a $1-$2 raise. I do think if you can bring her up to $20 that is much more in line for a great nanny who has sole charge of two-under-two.
A four dollar increase is within reason. Two dollars is certainly not.
A 2$/hr raise is over 10%. This is a huge raise. Most standard raises, in every other field, ranges from 3-5%, tops, on a yearly basis. Since another baby in no way means double the work, expecting triple a yearly raise is crazy. Expecting even more than that (4$/hr is ridiculous) shows what an uneducated non professional you are and I can guarantee you will always be looking for work.
Smart nannies understand economics and price themselves on the best end of market rates and know how and when to request rate increases.
Sometimes you have to give a generous raise when you discover your rates are under market, though. $20/hr is absolutely standard for two-under-two; maybe even a little low but certainly not offensive. With all of the responsibilities of that type of job, (which, have you ever done it? With kids that weren't yours?) do you really want to underpay and not get the most qualified or experienced or reliable person you can??