Anonymous wrote:
Bad nanny employers are everywhere. Why not make yourself better than the rest?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most, not all, mothers are jealous of the nanny-child attachment. Some go so far as to keep switching nannies, just to avoid it. They tend to be insecure with their choice to not be the primary caregiver. Little do they realize the severe permanent damage (unstable caregivers) causes a little child.

Why the heck are people so rude here? This poster is correct. It doesn't take a genius to know that kids need a stable environment to be most healthy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some of you office 'ladies' may want invest a little time in educating yourselves about early childhood development, bonding and attachment, in particular.

If your children have already suffered multiple primary caregiver severed attachments, all we can do is feel sorry for them.

*to invest

To further inform you... repercussions are likely to suddenly appear as "genetic mental illness" down the road. Of course people will say, "but the parents are so nice."

Think about it ladies, before getting defensive again. You owe it to your children, to do the very best you can with whatever you have available to you.

Nobody would argue that consistent childcare is ideal. Even substandard consist childcare is better than excellent inconsistent CCPs, but your last post about mental illness? I can't help, but think you are attempting to mock nannies. Am I missing the parody here?

I wonder what you might expect if a child has, let's say 6 nannies from the age of 4 weeks to her third birthday, for 50 hours a week? One nanny stayed 10 months, another one 5 weeks, the others were something in between.

I WISH my employers care about my charges.

They cared about them enough to hire you. The hypocrisy of nannies who consider it perfectly fine to collect a paycheck and badmouth their employers at the same time...