Anonymous wrote:
Here's exactly what you have to do if your domestic worker didn't bring her own food for a 10-12 hour workday in your house:
1. Provide food
OR
2. Arrange for your confined domestic worker to be able to take a break and go out and buy her own food
It's one or the other. You have no legal authority to starve a domestic worker in your house.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is what I said. I don't care much what kind of food you like to buy. But you must allow domestic workers food if they didn't bring their own. You are NOT allowed to stipulate in a contract that they must eat only their own food. Which part don't you like?
Please, please, cite exactly where this is said. Where it says that it is unacceptable to require a nanny to eat her own food. Where it very specifically requires an employer provide free food for their employees. Where such a perk isn't a perk, but, instead, some sort of "human rights issue". Don't be cagey, be sure to give me the exact language that requires me to provide my employee free food.
Your sources need to be government documents verifiable.
Where exactly did anyone say you have to give your domestic workers "free" food?
Anonymous wrote:
Here's exactly what you have to do if your domestic worker didn't bring her own food for a 10-12 hour workday in your house:
1. Provide food
OR
2. Arrange for your confined domestic worker to be able to take a break and go out and buy her own food
It's one or the other. You have no legal authority to starve a domestic worker in your house.
What if its fewer than 10 hours? Does it have to be exactly what she wants or just whatever we have in the house? Is it ok if she runs out to get something for lunch with the kids in tow or does it have to be a full break? I hope the quotes you dig up address these questions - lots of lack of clarity with your point here!
Anonymous wrote:This is what I said. I don't care much what kind of food you like to buy. But you must allow domestic workers food if they didn't bring their own. You are NOT allowed to stipulate in a contract that they must eat only their own food. Which part don't you like?
Please, please, cite exactly where this is said. Where it says that it is unacceptable to require a nanny to eat her own food. Where it very specifically requires an employer provide free food for their employees. Where such a perk isn't a perk, but, instead, some sort of "human rights issue". Don't be cagey, be sure to give me the exact language that requires me to provide my employee free food.
Your sources need to be government documents verifiable.
This is what I said. I don't care much what kind of food you like to buy. But you must allow domestic workers food if they didn't bring their own. You are NOT allowed to stipulate in a contract that they must eat only their own food. Which part don't you like?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would I tell you what industry I'm in, PP? It has no bearing on the topic at hand.
You've failed to make the case that feeding nannies is a human rights issue. It's a perk, pure and simple.
You can stop your trolling, now.
There is no workplace in the US where you can legally forbid people from getting food during their FT job. You can't even think up such a job, let alone your pretense that you have such a job.
Anonymous wrote:
Forcing a confined domestic worker in your house to go without food for 10 or 12 hours a day is WRONG and illegal. If she has the opportunity to bring in her own sufficient food, terrific. The nanny employer can save a couple of dollars a day.