Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How can living in a basement with your boss ever be considered a perk?
You don't have to pay rent, utilities, food, etc.
I am going to assume that you still have regular scheduled hours, a car to go out and do things, and more free money than you would have if you lived on your own.
I do think that it only works if it's a financial advantage for both parties involved. NF has to be paying less than they would for a live-out nanny, and nanny has to be netting more money every month than if she was paying for an apartment and utilities on her own.
Anonymous wrote:How can living in a basement with your boss ever be considered a perk?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$500 a month? Is that not what an au pair gets
Yea? So what. What is the difference? Is it not the exact same work? Is it morally ok to pay an au pair less?
Actually AUPAIRS make $800/mo.
For mine I also supply her with a car and food.
The $500/mo poster is reprehensible.
Actually, monthly salary for a live-in aupair as defined by the US State Department is US $195.75, but thank for playing!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$500 a month? Is that not what an au pair gets
Yea? So what. What is the difference? Is it not the exact same work? Is it morally ok to pay an au pair less?
Actually AUPAIRS make $800/mo.
For mine I also supply her with a car and food.
The $500/mo poster is reprehensible.
Actually, monthly salary for a live-in aupair as defined by the US State Department is US $195.75, but thank for playing!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$500 a month? Is that not what an au pair gets
Yea? So what. What is the difference? Is it not the exact same work? Is it morally ok to pay an au pair less?
Actually AUPAIRS make $800/mo.
For mine I also supply her with a car and food.
The $500/mo poster is reprehensible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:$500 a month? Is that not what an au pair gets
Yea? So what. What is the difference? Is it not the exact same work? Is it morally ok to pay an au pair less?
Anonymous wrote:I'm a live in nanny and I te paid 13$ an hour with an average of 25 hours per week, plus I pay 700$ In rent and all my bills ( car insurance gas cell bill credit card bill and gym membership) p am I being taken for granted??
Anonymous wrote:$500 a month? Is that not what an au pair gets
Anonymous wrote:Our live-in nanny is working at very well and she constantly says she is very happy. Our home is fairly large and she lives in the 1800 sq ft basement apartment with its own kitchen, laundry room, and bathroom. I pay for her electricity, water, internet, cable TV, and allow her 16 year old daughter to have her own bedroom with private bathroom on our second floor.
The way our contract is worded is she makes $500 a month. We were paying her $1600 but she would have to then immediately pay her landlord $1300 for her place and pay for all her utilities.
Now, we save money on childcare, she has more money left over after rent and utilities and I even allow her to babysit another child in my home (complete with legal agreement signed by the other parent for legal protection).
Our nanny is awesome and is more like a member of the family than a nanny. She is not restricted to the basement apartment and can use our kitchen and backyard fire-pit/pool anytime she wants.
If she ever said she didn't like the arrangement, I would sit down and see what we could come up with to make everyone happy, but once it becomes considerably cheaper (not just cheaper) to hire outside care, she will lose her job and her place to stay. I would of course allow her several months to relocate and probably help her move both financially and with loading her things.
Some nannies are great people. Some nannies are absolutely useless. The person on here that keeps going on about how terrible live-in arrangement are or how live-in requirements are somehow "discrimination" is obviously not educated enough to know why they are wrong and not someone you want watching your child anyway.