Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is in regards to PP
This is my case, they’re paying me under the table, even though I didn’t want this. Now I had to beg the, for 3 weeks!!! To at least give me some money to pay for my bills and food. They’re totally tried not to pay me anything, until they finally did, and want me back when this is over....meanwhile they’re still working and making money
You still took the job. And now you're dealing with the consequences of it. By getting paid under the table, you are cheating the government out of taxes. So it's hard to feel sorry for you now that you aren't getting paid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is in regards to PP
This is my case, they’re paying me under the table, even though I didn’t want this. Now I had to beg the, for 3 weeks!!! To at least give me some money to pay for my bills and food. They’re totally tried not to pay me anything, until they finally did, and want me back when this is over....meanwhile they’re still working and making money
This is when you file for unemployment.
How do you file for unemployment when you're not paid on the books? It means your employers never contributed to unemployment for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is in regards to PP
This is my case, they’re paying me under the table, even though I didn’t want this. Now I had to beg the, for 3 weeks!!! To at least give me some money to pay for my bills and food. They’re totally tried not to pay me anything, until they finally did, and want me back when this is over....meanwhile they’re still working and making money
This is when you file for unemployment.
Anonymous wrote:This is in regards to PP
This is my case, they’re paying me under the table, even though I didn’t want this. Now I had to beg the, for 3 weeks!!! To at least give me some money to pay for my bills and food. They’re totally tried not to pay me anything, until they finally did, and want me back when this is over....meanwhile they’re still working and making money
Anonymous wrote:I would assume you are not working if you can get by without a nanny. So in your situation I would pay half her salary. It's not her fault she's not working.
Anonymous wrote:People paying the nanny during their quarantine are good people. Thank you.
Anonymous wrote:We have had a nanny for three years but given the current situation we are going to tell her to stay at home. We plan to bring her back once things calm down - which obviously could be in June. We are wondering whether we should continue to pay her as if she was working full-time, or pay her a reduced rate? And if a reduced rate - what % of her salary? What are folks doing in this case?
Thanks in advance!
Anonymous wrote:"People who quit their jobs are not eligible. "
That's not true. We were told to stay home and shelter in place, or protect ourselves if living with underlying health conditions, so we had no choice but to quit, and yes we still can apply.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"People who quit their jobs are not eligible. "
That's not true. We were told to stay home and shelter in place, or protect ourselves if living with underlying health conditions, so we had no choice but to quit, and yes we still can apply.
Let us know how that goes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How so? We are facing a global health crisis. Have you seen the news lately?
Oh please. Nanny normally makes $1k while working. Nanny is offered the choice to work or be paid off, knowing she’ll get more to not work? That’s insane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are continuing to pay our nanny as well. We’re on the books, so she has the option to file for unemployment. We’re planning to pay at least through May or June, but what happens if this continues through September? What is a reasonable timeframe/notice?
Ok I don’t get this at all... if the nanny isn’t coming in why is anyone paying anything ? Wouldn’t it be smarter to just lay her off then she could file unemployment for x amount of time. If the unemployment is 600 a week on top of the state ( let’s say $850 per week total) that’s way more than most nanny’s take home anyway. And then you can hire her back later if you both wish. Am I missing something??
Nobody is getting $600 plus normal unemployment.
Anonymous wrote:This is in regards to PP
This is my case, they’re paying me under the table, even though I didn’t want this. Now I had to beg the, for 3 weeks!!! To at least give me some money to pay for my bills and food. They’re totally tried not to pay me anything, until they finally did, and want me back when this is over....meanwhile they’re still working and making money
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are continuing to pay our nanny as well. We’re on the books, so she has the option to file for unemployment. We’re planning to pay at least through May or June, but what happens if this continues through September? What is a reasonable timeframe/notice?
Ok I don’t get this at all... if the nanny isn’t coming in why is anyone paying anything ? Wouldn’t it be smarter to just lay her off then she could file unemployment for x amount of time. If the unemployment is 600 a week on top of the state ( let’s say $850 per week total) that’s way more than most nanny’s take home anyway. And then you can hire her back later if you both wish. Am I missing something??
Nobody is getting $600 plus normal unemployment.
https://gtm.com/household/expanded-unemployment-benefits/
$600 in addition to state level unemployment.
That’s ridiculous
Anonymous wrote:This is in regards to PP
This is my case, they’re paying me under the table, even though I didn’t want this. Now I had to beg the, for 3 weeks!!! To at least give me some money to pay for my bills and food. They’re totally tried not to pay me anything, until they finally did, and want me back when this is over....meanwhile they’re still working and making money