Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I make $24+PTO
its just one family. They have twins. For a nanny share the rate should be higher.

Based on what? How would taking care of 2 kids from different families be more work than siblings?

Charging families a higher rate for being in a share is just a cash grab.

Hey, you have to deal with two sets of parents. It's "one position" but it's like you have two employers. I specialize in taking care of twins. I have never done (and I think never will) Nanny share. So I don't have much information from my own experience about it. However, I haven't met a single Nanny NOT complaining about that kind of position.

One family is more easy-going than the other (I think this is the more annoying part of the position)

Moving from one house to another

One family picks up its child at "4" but Nanny has to stay with other one until "7"(I know she is getting paid for that time. It's still enjoying)

Some holidays one family gives the Nanny green light to take the day off, but the other family needs you. I know, the above points don't apply to all Nanny share positions. It's just to give you some examples.

Nanny share? No, thanks!

And, NO, it's not the same. Never ever

Anonymous wrote:No need to pay attention to the bitter nanny poster, who will rant and rave no matter what. Carry on.

No need to pay attention to troll posters who call posters bitter bc that’s all they can do once called out. Don’t carry on. Go find some purpose.

Anonymous wrote:No need to pay attention to the bitter nanny poster, who will rant and rave no matter what. Carry on.

True. However the fact remains that in 2020 no good nanny would accept $22 an hour for two infants in a share.

No need to pay attention to the bitter nanny poster, who will rant and rave no matter what. Carry on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I make $24+PTO
its just one family. They have twins. For a nanny share the rate should be higher.

Based on what? How would taking care of 2 kids from different families be more work than siblings?

Charging families a higher rate for being in a share is just a cash grab.

Why do you think people negotiate pay and work? Do you think people work for fun and money is just the bonus? Do you work for free?

Also, families in a nanny share pay significantly lower than families not in a share. Hence why shares are popular.

Huh? I'm assuming the nanny is taking care of the two kids together for the exact same hours. If that is the case then the nanny charges one rate because it is one job. Sure, you can negotiate. But you don't raise your rate just because there are 2 families splitting the cost and you think they should pay more!

You can assume whatever you want but that is not always the case. And yes, your overall rate is typically higher with a nanny share. The families pay less than a single family. How is that unclear to you? It’s not a walk in the park to deal with two families, two parenting philosophies, two kids the same age, etc.

So yeah, I may charge a single family $24-$25/hr for two kids and a nanny share I’ll charge $28-$30 which is $14-$15 per family. You are really arguing that nanny share families get to pay less while the nanny gets paid more?! You’ve clearly never worked a nanny share or know much about the logistics.

I was in one for 3 years actually. Have fun charging those prices. Maybe you’ll find some rich dummy.

Dummy?! You’re the one claiming $14-$15 per family is a high rate. If you can’t afford that then what are you doing looking for a nanny period. Nanny shares are usually for families who are far from wealthy to begin with, i.e. you. Most wealthy families aren’t looking for a nanny share. They are looking for a single nanny to focus exclusively on their own kids. Sorry it’s hard for you to come to terms about where you are financially, compared to others. Also sorry to disappoint you but I’ve found that rate with no issues (when I actually commit to a share) bc I know how hard the work is. I also seek out families who are educated, respectful and realistic about the work that goes into a share, none of which you are. What you value in your childcare experience is very different than what the families I work with value.

I'm not looking for a nanny - but I was in a share for 3 years and paid a little under $12 an hour for a wonderful 'working class' nanny (lol). The other family paid the same rate (around $23/hour total). Kids were well taken care of and so was our nanny whom we still see regularly. Quite frankly I'm not sure what you're ranting and raving about. Happy holidays!

I’m sure your experience was wonderful for you. Quite frankly, I’m not sure what you continue to feel the need to justify yourself. Who are you trying to convince? You paid what you did, wrote what you did and gave your opinion about nannies. Your attempt at confusion is cute. Hopefully, the New Year will bring you some clarity. Happy Holidays!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I make $24+PTO
its just one family. They have twins. For a nanny share the rate should be higher.

Based on what? How would taking care of 2 kids from different families be more work than siblings?

Charging families a higher rate for being in a share is just a cash grab.

Why do you think people negotiate pay and work? Do you think people work for fun and money is just the bonus? Do you work for free?

Also, families in a nanny share pay significantly lower than families not in a share. Hence why shares are popular.

Huh? I'm assuming the nanny is taking care of the two kids together for the exact same hours. If that is the case then the nanny charges one rate because it is one job. Sure, you can negotiate. But you don't raise your rate just because there are 2 families splitting the cost and you think they should pay more!

You can assume whatever you want but that is not always the case. And yes, your overall rate is typically higher with a nanny share. The families pay less than a single family. How is that unclear to you? It’s not a walk in the park to deal with two families, two parenting philosophies, two kids the same age, etc.

So yeah, I may charge a single family $24-$25/hr for two kids and a nanny share I’ll charge $28-$30 which is $14-$15 per family. You are really arguing that nanny share families get to pay less while the nanny gets paid more?! You’ve clearly never worked a nanny share or know much about the logistics.

I was in one for 3 years actually. Have fun charging those prices. Maybe you’ll find some rich dummy.

Dummy?! You’re the one claiming $14-$15 per family is a high rate. If you can’t afford that then what are you doing looking for a nanny period. Nanny shares are usually for families who are far from wealthy to begin with, i.e. you. Most wealthy families aren’t looking for a nanny share. They are looking for a single nanny to focus exclusively on their own kids. Sorry it’s hard for you to come to terms about where you are financially, compared to others. Also sorry to disappoint you but I’ve found that rate with no issues (when I actually commit to a share) bc I know how hard the work is. I also seek out families who are educated, respectful and realistic about the work that goes into a share, none of which you are. What you value in your childcare experience is very different than what the families I work with value.

I'm not looking for a nanny - but I was in a share for 3 years and paid a little under $12 an hour for a wonderful 'working class' nanny (lol). The other family paid the same rate (around $23/hour total). Kids were well taken care of and so was our nanny whom we still see regularly. Quite frankly I'm not sure what you're ranting and raving about. Happy holidays!

I do not believe anyone - nanny or employer - who wrote that $22 an hour for an infant share was even remotely reasonable.

This is a truly pathetic thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I make $24+PTO
its just one family. They have twins. For a nanny share the rate should be higher.

Based on what? How would taking care of 2 kids from different families be more work than siblings?

Charging families a higher rate for being in a share is just a cash grab.

Why do you think people negotiate pay and work? Do you think people work for fun and money is just the bonus? Do you work for free?

Also, families in a nanny share pay significantly lower than families not in a share. Hence why shares are popular.

Huh? I'm assuming the nanny is taking care of the two kids together for the exact same hours. If that is the case then the nanny charges one rate because it is one job. Sure, you can negotiate. But you don't raise your rate just because there are 2 families splitting the cost and you think they should pay more!

You can assume whatever you want but that is not always the case. And yes, your overall rate is typically higher with a nanny share. The families pay less than a single family. How is that unclear to you? It’s not a walk in the park to deal with two families, two parenting philosophies, two kids the same age, etc.

So yeah, I may charge a single family $24-$25/hr for two kids and a nanny share I’ll charge $28-$30 which is $14-$15 per family. You are really arguing that nanny share families get to pay less while the nanny gets paid more?! You’ve clearly never worked a nanny share or know much about the logistics.

I was in one for 3 years actually. Have fun charging those prices. Maybe you’ll find some rich dummy.

Dummy?! You’re the one claiming $14-$15 per family is a high rate. If you can’t afford that then what are you doing looking for a nanny period. Nanny shares are usually for families who are far from wealthy to begin with, i.e. you. Most wealthy families aren’t looking for a nanny share. They are looking for a single nanny to focus exclusively on their own kids. Sorry it’s hard for you to come to terms about where you are financially, compared to others. Also sorry to disappoint you but I’ve found that rate with no issues (when I actually commit to a share) bc I know how hard the work is. I also seek out families who are educated, respectful and realistic about the work that goes into a share, none of which you are. What you value in your childcare experience is very different than what the families I work with value.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I make $24+PTO
its just one family. They have twins. For a nanny share the rate should be higher.

Based on what? How would taking care of 2 kids from different families be more work than siblings?

Charging families a higher rate for being in a share is just a cash grab.

Why do you think people negotiate pay and work? Do you think people work for fun and money is just the bonus? Do you work for free?

Also, families in a nanny share pay significantly lower than families not in a share. Hence why shares are popular.

Huh? I'm assuming the nanny is taking care of the two kids together for the exact same hours. If that is the case then the nanny charges one rate because it is one job. Sure, you can negotiate. But you don't raise your rate just because there are 2 families splitting the cost and you think they should pay more!

You can assume whatever you want but that is not always the case. And yes, your overall rate is typically higher with a nanny share. The families pay less than a single family. How is that unclear to you? It’s not a walk in the park to deal with two families, two parenting philosophies, two kids the same age, etc.

So yeah, I may charge a single family $24-$25/hr for two kids and a nanny share I’ll charge $28-$30 which is $14-$15 per family. You are really arguing that nanny share families get to pay less while the nanny gets paid more?! You’ve clearly never worked a nanny share or know much about the logistics.

I was in one for 3 years actually. Have fun charging those prices. Maybe you’ll find some rich dummy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That is a reasonable rate. You have to realize not everyone is a high earner and in order to pay you, their salary, minus taxes, and all that good stuff plus a little left over.

Can you afford to live in DC on $22/hr? What would your housing situation be if you had to?

Yes, I have lived off less. I lived in a group house and then later got married.

Same. I made less when I was in the Army and getting shot at in Iraq. Perspective.

It is an all volunteer army so you chose this. Stop whining.

This is an absolutely reprehensible comment. Shame on this PP.

Why? Bc it’s true?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That is a reasonable rate. You have to realize not everyone is a high earner and in order to pay you, their salary, minus taxes, and all that good stuff plus a little left over.

It isn't OP's problem if you aren't a high earner! She should not accept a job with two kids for $22/hr. More like $30/,hr. People should stop having kids they cannot afford or stay home and take care of your own kid.

DP but $30 is very high, regardless of whether nanny employers are high earners or not.

It's the same as selling a house. You can set your price as high as you want, but you might not get any buyers. You can then choose either to lower the price to a point someone will pay or take it off the market.

If you can afford a million dollar house and want someone to come into your home to raise your kids, why would you expect that to be cheap?! What services where someone comes to you are cheap? The problem is, you, along with people like you, think everything you want should fit into your budget. A nanny isn’t for everyone.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I make $24+PTO
its just one family. They have twins. For a nanny share the rate should be higher.

Based on what? How would taking care of 2 kids from different families be more work than siblings?

Charging families a higher rate for being in a share is just a cash grab.

Why do you think people negotiate pay and work? Do you think people work for fun and money is just the bonus? Do you work for free?

Also, families in a nanny share pay significantly lower than families not in a share. Hence why shares are popular.

Huh? I'm assuming the nanny is taking care of the two kids together for the exact same hours. If that is the case then the nanny charges one rate because it is one job. Sure, you can negotiate. But you don't raise your rate just because there are 2 families splitting the cost and you think they should pay more!

You can assume whatever you want but that is not always the case. And yes, your overall rate is typically higher with a nanny share. The families pay less than a single family. How is that unclear to you? It’s not a walk in the park to deal with two families, two parenting philosophies, two kids the same age, etc.

So yeah, I may charge a single family $24-$25/hr for two kids and a nanny share I’ll charge $28-$30 which is $14-$15 per family. You are really arguing that nanny share families get to pay less while the nanny gets paid more?! You’ve clearly never worked a nanny share or know much about the logistics.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That is a reasonable rate. You have to realize not everyone is a high earner and in order to pay you, their salary, minus taxes, and all that good stuff plus a little left over.

Can you afford to live in DC on $22/hr? What would your housing situation be if you had to?

Yes, I have lived off less. I lived in a group house and then later got married.

Same. I made less when I was in the Army and getting shot at in Iraq. Perspective.

It is an all volunteer army so you chose this. Stop whining.

This is an absolutely reprehensible comment. Shame on this PP.

My father was career military, 35 years. This was his job and he neither expected not would have accepted the patronizing "Thank your service"crap. He was doing his job without whining. PP should do the same.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That is a reasonable rate. You have to realize not everyone is a high earner and in order to pay you, their salary, minus taxes, and all that good stuff plus a little left over.

It isn't OP's problem if you aren't a high earner! She should not accept a job with two kids for $22/hr. More like $30/,hr. People should stop having kids they cannot afford or stay home and take care of your own kid.

DP but $30 is very high, regardless of whether nanny employers are high earners or not.

It's the same as selling a house. You can set your price as high as you want, but you might not get any buyers. You can then choose either to lower the price to a point someone will pay or take it off the market.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That is a reasonable rate. You have to realize not everyone is a high earner and in order to pay you, their salary, minus taxes, and all that good stuff plus a little left over.

Can you afford to live in DC on $22/hr? What would your housing situation be if you had to?

Yes, I have lived off less. I lived in a group house and then later got married.

Same. I made less when I was in the Army and getting shot at in Iraq. Perspective.

It is an all volunteer army so you chose this. Stop whining.

This is an absolutely reprehensible comment. Shame on this PP.