Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe insecure parents would be better off putting their children in daycare where the workers are always being watched.
Maybe phone addicted nannies should seek help since that is the only reason they oppose cameras.
Anonymous wrote:Maybe insecure parents would be better off putting their children in daycare where the workers are always being watched.
Anonymous wrote:+1
Why can an employer check her phone to see her child (supposedly), yet begrudge her Nanny for using hers??
Also the answer is simple, hire an over-30 nanny if you do not want a nanny who has to check her Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I personally think if you leave your child at home with their caregiver, then go to your job worried and preoccupied that your child is not receiving quality care, then you should quit your job & stay home.
Sure, you may have to live in a smaller house.
And not have much in the bank for vacations + such.
You may also have to dress your child in hand-me-downs too.
But it is the right thing to do.
Any employee who is distracted while on a time clock is not someone who is giving 100% on her job.
That makes her a lackluster employee & a terribly neglectful parent.
If I saw my employee logged into her smartphone, watching her baby (and nanny) while on duty, then I would think she was not an efficient employee.
Yet these same employees get angry at their own employees logged in and using their phones.
What’s the difference??
If you MUST hear your child laugh a few times during the day, then you are not fit to be a working parent.
Period.
I mean.....
What did people do 25yrs. ago??
They went to work and WORKED.
Why can’t they today?
Just get used to cameras. Stop all this hand-wringing and just do your damn job and be proud of the job you do.
-signed, a nanny
No, I don't believe you're a nanny at all. And I'm not the poster you're fighting with.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I personally think if you leave your child at home with their caregiver, then go to your job worried and preoccupied that your child is not receiving quality care, then you should quit your job & stay home.
Sure, you may have to live in a smaller house.
And not have much in the bank for vacations + such.
You may also have to dress your child in hand-me-downs too.
But it is the right thing to do.
Any employee who is distracted while on a time clock is not someone who is giving 100% on her job.
That makes her a lackluster employee & a terribly neglectful parent.
If I saw my employee logged into her smartphone, watching her baby (and nanny) while on duty, then I would think she was not an efficient employee.
Yet these same employees get angry at their own employees logged in and using their phones.
What’s the difference??
If you MUST hear your child laugh a few times during the day, then you are not fit to be a working parent.
Period.
I mean.....
What did people do 25yrs. ago??
They went to work and WORKED.
Why can’t they today?
Just get used to cameras. Stop all this hand-wringing and just do your damn job and be proud of the job you do.
-signed, a nanny
Anonymous wrote:I personally think if you leave your child at home with their caregiver, then go to your job worried and preoccupied that your child is not receiving quality care, then you should quit your job & stay home.
Sure, you may have to live in a smaller house.
And not have much in the bank for vacations + such.
You may also have to dress your child in hand-me-downs too.
But it is the right thing to do.
Any employee who is distracted while on a time clock is not someone who is giving 100% on her job.
That makes her a lackluster employee & a terribly neglectful parent.
If I saw my employee logged into her smartphone, watching her baby (and nanny) while on duty, then I would think she was not an efficient employee.
Yet these same employees get angry at their own employees logged in and using their phones.
What’s the difference??
If you MUST hear your child laugh a few times during the day, then you are not fit to be a working parent.
Period.
I mean.....
What did people do 25yrs. ago??
They went to work and WORKED.
Why can’t they today?

Anonymous wrote:^ I find it shocking that she would still be on her phone when she KNOWS you can see her, lol! That’s kind of weird.
I don’t think you necessarily would have to rule out all young nannies. Just make it clear in the interview that you have cameras and a zero tolerance policy for phone usage while your child is awake. Automatic fire, three strikes, whatever you want to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I use the cameras to catch my child's nanny on the phone and then I text her and tell her to get off the phone. She is 26 and addicted to her damn phone.
Then hire a new nanny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I finally get why I see so many nanny’s and au pairs at the library or other play places stuck on their phones. Their employers are constantly watching them at home and they can’t touch their phones. Now, I know why they just sit their on their phones because then can’t get a break at the house.
Do you know that lots of grown ups in various professions do not get breaks save a lunch hour? Grow up, PP.
So bc you decided on a profession that doesn’t allow breaks means everyone else should too? You should grow up and choose a profession that allows you to have breaks if that is what you want or need.