Anonymous wrote:
! When my DD was younger I took her to work with me she was treated the same as my chrages by me. Parents loved the fact the boys always had someone to play with
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fanthom poster here. No sorry I'd never leave my 10 month old to come give the same love and attention to your 10 month old 50 hours a week, sorry. However I'd be more than willing to bring my child a long to give them both love and attention! 50 hours a week is a lot to not be able to see my child. That's why I only accept nanny positions where my son is allowed. I was contacted for a position that would pay $1000/wk and turned down the interview because my son couldn't be brought with me. It's not about the money to everyone ya know. Being able to see my child is VERY important to me.
When you interview with women who leave their children to go to work to put food on the table and pay your salary, do you tell them that you think their lives are all about money?
I'm a nanny so I'm not interviewing anyone. And I have no problem with women who work 50 hours a week and aren't able to see/bring their kids. Just not my personal preference. And to me there is a huge difference of going into an office 50 hours a week vs taking care of another child your child's age. How could you look at that other child and not once miss your own and wish you were raising them? If you are spending that much time with another child and not your own its hard to understand how much time you actually get to spend with your own kids... But whatever floats your boat!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with your DH at this age.
1) Your baby is at a stage where he needs attention and love and what if nanny is giving more attention and love to her own child. Your baby will feel somewhat replaced.
2) Your child will see the other baby playing with his/her toys and might go for it and nanny will probably say in a silly voice "we need to share".. Your baby is to young to understand sharing and will think nanny is favoring her baby.
3) If theres a fire or intruder who will nanny go to first? Tough to swallow but most likely her own baby.
4) Less one on one attention.
5) Nanny will start getting use to this situation and want more 'playdates'
6) You lose out on more food, diapers, wipes, etc. (because I doubt nanny will use her supplies for her kid)
7) If her child likes to watch a certain show while your baby likes another cartoon guess what show they're going to watch? Nanny's baby's show.
8) Nap times will be a problem.
9) Nanny will be more exausted chasing double.
The list goes on.. Now yes, maybe I'm looking at all the negatives but like another PP mentioned, this does nothing for your child at this point. Socializing should come around the toddler stage but right now your baby needs love, stability and comfort. I'm not saying this playdate will ruin him/her lol but lets face it.. You and your child lose out much more then you gain.
You say that the child is too young to understand "sharing" but they can feel "replaced"? Seriously, if any child would feel replaced it would be the nanny's kid.
#3 wow. What would you do in this situation if you had 2 or more kids? you would take them both.
#4 do kids really need CONSTANT one on one attention?
#7: again, they are only 11 months, I dont think that they have super strong tv preferences
#9: I think she would deal with it.
-an MB
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fanthom poster here. No sorry I'd never leave my 10 month old to come give the same love and attention to your 10 month old 50 hours a week, sorry. However I'd be more than willing to bring my child a long to give them both love and attention! 50 hours a week is a lot to not be able to see my child. That's why I only accept nanny positions where my son is allowed. I was contacted for a position that would pay $1000/wk and turned down the interview because my son couldn't be brought with me. It's not about the money to everyone ya know. Being able to see my child is VERY important to me.
When you interview with women who leave their children to go to work to put food on the table and pay your salary, do you tell them that you think their lives are all about money?
Anonymous wrote:Not nearly as appalling as your baseless sense of entitlement, 12:22.
Anonymous wrote:Never let a nanny bring her child to work unless you need a nanny share. If she wants to pay half of a share and you're ok with it, then be very careful, up your insurance to cover your additional liability, and go ahead.
Honestly, though, there is no other benefit to families besides the cost saving.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with your DH at this age.
1) Your baby is at a stage where he needs attention and love and what if nanny is giving more attention and love to her own child. Your baby will feel somewhat replaced.
2) Your child will see the other baby playing with his/her toys and might go for it and nanny will probably say in a silly voice "we need to share".. Your baby is to young to understand sharing and will think nanny is favoring her baby.
3) If theres a fire or intruder who will nanny go to first? Tough to swallow but most likely her own baby.
4) Less one on one attention.
5) Nanny will start getting use to this situation and want more 'playdates'
6) You lose out on more food, diapers, wipes, etc. (because I doubt nanny will use her supplies for her kid)
7) If her child likes to watch a certain show while your baby likes another cartoon guess what show they're going to watch? Nanny's baby's show.
8) Nap times will be a problem.
9) Nanny will be more exausted chasing double.
The list goes on.. Now yes, maybe I'm looking at all the negatives but like another PP mentioned, this does nothing for your child at this point. Socializing should come around the toddler stage but right now your baby needs love, stability and comfort. I'm not saying this playdate will ruin him/her lol but lets face it.. You and your child lose out much more then you gain.
You say that the child is too young to understand "sharing" but they can feel "replaced"? Seriously, if any child would feel replaced it would be the nanny's kid.
#3 wow. What would you do in this situation if you had 2 or more kids? you would take them both.
#4 do kids really need CONSTANT one on one attention?
#7: again, they are only 11 months, I dont think that they have super strong tv preferences
#9: I think she would deal with it.
-an MB
Anonymous wrote:I agree with your DH at this age.
1) Your baby is at a stage where he needs attention and love and what if nanny is giving more attention and love to her own child. Your baby will feel somewhat replaced.
2) Your child will see the other baby playing with his/her toys and might go for it and nanny will probably say in a silly voice "we need to share".. Your baby is to young to understand sharing and will think nanny is favoring her baby.
3) If theres a fire or intruder who will nanny go to first? Tough to swallow but most likely her own baby.
4) Less one on one attention.
5) Nanny will start getting use to this situation and want more 'playdates'
6) You lose out on more food, diapers, wipes, etc. (because I doubt nanny will use her supplies for her kid)
7) If her child likes to watch a certain show while your baby likes another cartoon guess what show they're going to watch? Nanny's baby's show.
8) Nap times will be a problem.
9) Nanny will be more exausted chasing double.
The list goes on.. Now yes, maybe I'm looking at all the negatives but like another PP mentioned, this does nothing for your child at this point. Socializing should come around the toddler stage but right now your baby needs love, stability and comfort. I'm not saying this playdate will ruin him/her lol but lets face it.. You and your child lose out much more then you gain.
Anonymous wrote:Fanthom poster here. No sorry I'd never leave my 10 month old to come give the same love and attention to your 10 month old 50 hours a week, sorry. However I'd be more than willing to bring my child a long to give them both love and attention! 50 hours a week is a lot to not be able to see my child. That's why I only accept nanny positions where my son is allowed. I was contacted for a position that would pay $1000/wk and turned down the interview because my son couldn't be brought with me. It's not about the money to everyone ya know. Being able to see my child is VERY important to me.