Anonymous wrote:
Stop taking the word "primary" so personally. It doesn't mean most important or permanent. It simply means the person providing the majority of care for the child. Some babies go to bed at 7 and wake at 7 the next morning. If nanny works from 6-6 or 7-6, she is the one who spends the most waking hours with the child, and provides most of the care. It is not a comment on how important the parent is, so chill out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"The primary caregiver is always the parent. The responsibility, funding, decisions, stability rests with the parent. Good daytime caregivers - nannies, friends, teachers - add to the mom/dad, but they don't replace parents."
I'm an MB but...
1. no, parents are not always the primary caregivers. Primary caregiver is the one(s) w/ the child for most of their waking hours over a week/month/whatever. In some cases that might be mom, in many it's nanny. Nanny WAS my dd's primary caretaker my first year back at work. I hated that so i cut back hours some so that i was seeing DD at least as much as her, if not more.
2. even if nanny is the primary caretaker, of course that's not a replacement of the parents. They always have a unique and long term role. But parent does not always and necessarily equal primary caregiver.
If you're an MB, you are a primary caregiver. You know why? A nanny, even the best nanny, can get another job, move countries, get married, and leave you with nothing but a sweet card and a three week notice. You, the mommy, are stuck with this. You'll be there. That's why.
You need a dose of reality. As sad as it is, even some mommies leave their children. No one here is wearing a chain around her neck.
Mommies leave children only very occasionally. Nannies leave children, eventually, pretty much in 100% of cases. A mother is a lot more permanent presence in her child's life vs. a nanny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"The primary caregiver is always the parent. The responsibility, funding, decisions, stability rests with the parent. Good daytime caregivers - nannies, friends, teachers - add to the mom/dad, but they don't replace parents."
I'm an MB but...
1. no, parents are not always the primary caregivers. Primary caregiver is the one(s) w/ the child for most of their waking hours over a week/month/whatever. In some cases that might be mom, in many it's nanny. Nanny WAS my dd's primary caretaker my first year back at work. I hated that so i cut back hours some so that i was seeing DD at least as much as her, if not more.
2. even if nanny is the primary caretaker, of course that's not a replacement of the parents. They always have a unique and long term role. But parent does not always and necessarily equal primary caregiver.
If you're an MB, you are a primary caregiver. You know why? A nanny, even the best nanny, can get another job, move countries, get married, and leave you with nothing but a sweet card and a three week notice. You, the mommy, are stuck with this. You'll be there. That's why.
You need a dose of reality. As sad as it is, even some mommies leave their children. No one here is wearing a chain around her neck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"The primary caregiver is always the parent. The responsibility, funding, decisions, stability rests with the parent. Good daytime caregivers - nannies, friends, teachers - add to the mom/dad, but they don't replace parents."
I'm an MB but...
1. no, parents are not always the primary caregivers. Primary caregiver is the one(s) w/ the child for most of their waking hours over a week/month/whatever. In some cases that might be mom, in many it's nanny. Nanny WAS my dd's primary caretaker my first year back at work. I hated that so i cut back hours some so that i was seeing DD at least as much as her, if not more.
2. even if nanny is the primary caretaker, of course that's not a replacement of the parents. They always have a unique and long term role. But parent does not always and necessarily equal primary caregiver.
If you're an MB, you are a primary caregiver. You know why? A nanny, even the best nanny, can get another job, move countries, get married, and leave you with nothing but a sweet card and a three week notice. You, the mommy, are stuck with this. You'll be there. That's why.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Geez I did not expect this post to turn out with these kinds of responses. We have made the decision to maintain the nanny as a 3 child share. My child will be in preschool in the mornings and I would still like to maintain the nanny for stability reasons. I also still plan on paying her while my child is in preschool. It does benefit the other family because they are also getting a wonderful nanny and not paying the full rate of a nanny on their own. The ages of the children are 2.5, 2, and soon to be newborn. The nanny can take on the responsibility mainly due to the fact that one child will be in preschool half a day. I know that people do 3 child shares, so this isn't crazy! And I am not interested in home daycare.
Can you share what financial arrangements did you put in place? Who's paying how much?
We haven't made the decision yet on how much to pay, ect. I personally don't feel comfortable with only paying 1/3 because it feels like we would be paying too little. We have agreed on paying the nanny $21.5 for all three. This way we have room for performance raises ect.
Anonymous wrote:"The primary caregiver is always the parent. The responsibility, funding, decisions, stability rests with the parent. Good daytime caregivers - nannies, friends, teachers - add to the mom/dad, but they don't replace parents."
I'm an MB but...
1. no, parents are not always the primary caregivers. Primary caregiver is the one(s) w/ the child for most of their waking hours over a week/month/whatever. In some cases that might be mom, in many it's nanny. Nanny WAS my dd's primary caretaker my first year back at work. I hated that so i cut back hours some so that i was seeing DD at least as much as her, if not more.
2. even if nanny is the primary caretaker, of course that's not a replacement of the parents. They always have a unique and long term role. But parent does not always and necessarily equal primary caregiver.
Anonymous wrote:"The primary caregiver is always the parent. The responsibility, funding, decisions, stability rests with the parent. Good daytime caregivers - nannies, friends, teachers - add to the mom/dad, but they don't replace parents."
I'm an MB but...
1. no, parents are not always the primary caregivers. Primary caregiver is the one(s) w/ the child for most of their waking hours over a week/month/whatever. In some cases that might be mom, in many it's nanny. Nanny WAS my dd's primary caretaker my first year back at work. I hated that so i cut back hours some so that i was seeing DD at least as much as her, if not more.
2. even if nanny is the primary caretaker, of course that's not a replacement of the parents. They always have a unique and long term role. But parent does not always and necessarily equal primary caregiver.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I have worked for free, thank you.
You make yourself sound like the ultimate materialist. Maybe you take pride in that label?
By no means do I expect you to know this, but stability IS actually a critical ingredient when raising young children. That's why many parents (and nannies!), will bend over backwards to work towards a longterm relationship.
Children pay a price for every major upheaval in their lives. Smart parents do their best to minimize unnecessary changeovers of primary caregivers.
A primary caregiver is a parent, and that ain't changing until the parent dies. Everyone else comes and goes.
Few children live a life free of changes.
The "primary caregiver" is the person who cares for the child for most of his or her waking hours, hence the word "primary". Lots of parents hardly see their children. The may pay the bills, but they certainly aren't doing the caring all day from their offices.
Seriously? "Most of his/her waking hours?"
So you'd consider yourself a primary caregiver for a toddler until the day he starts preschool, and then, the day he starts coming home at noon, you are no longer that? What about an infant who has trouble sleeping at night, would you consider his mom a primary caregiver since he's awake a lot at night, but the second he starts sleeping through the night, you get the honors since now you have more of his awake time and she has more sleep? You'd go crazy doing this math.
Don't be ridiculous. The primary caregiver is always the parent. The responsibility, funding, decisions, stability rests with the parent. Good daytime caregivers - nannies, friends, teachers - add to the mom/dad, but they don't replace parents. And kids know that, too. It in no way diminishes the work of good nannies. It simply sets the record straight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I have worked for free, thank you.
You make yourself sound like the ultimate materialist. Maybe you take pride in that label?
By no means do I expect you to know this, but stability IS actually a critical ingredient when raising young children. That's why many parents (and nannies!), will bend over backwards to work towards a longterm relationship.
Children pay a price for every major upheaval in their lives. Smart parents do their best to minimize unnecessary changeovers of primary caregivers.
A primary caregiver is a parent, and that ain't changing until the parent dies. Everyone else comes and goes.
Few children live a life free of changes.
The "primary caregiver" is the person who cares for the child for most of his or her waking hours, hence the word "primary". Lots of parents hardly see their children. The may pay the bills, but they certainly aren't doing the caring all day from their offices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I have worked for free, thank you.
You make yourself sound like the ultimate materialist. Maybe you take pride in that label?
By no means do I expect you to know this, but stability IS actually a critical ingredient when raising young children. That's why many parents (and nannies!), will bend over backwards to work towards a longterm relationship.
Children pay a price for every major upheaval in their lives. Smart parents do their best to minimize unnecessary changeovers of primary caregivers.
A primary caregiver is a parent, and that ain't changing until the parent dies. Everyone else comes and goes.
Few children live a life free of changes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Geez I did not expect this post to turn out with these kinds of responses. We have made the decision to maintain the nanny as a 3 child share. My child will be in preschool in the mornings and I would still like to maintain the nanny for stability reasons. I also still plan on paying her while my child is in preschool. It does benefit the other family because they are also getting a wonderful nanny and not paying the full rate of a nanny on their own. The ages of the children are 2.5, 2, and soon to be newborn. The nanny can take on the responsibility mainly due to the fact that one child will be in preschool half a day. I know that people do 3 child shares, so this isn't crazy! And I am not interested in home daycare.
Can you share what financial arrangements did you put in place? Who's paying how much?
We haven't made the decision yet on how much to pay, ect. I personally don't feel comfortable with only paying 1/3 because it feels like we would be paying too little. We have agreed on paying the nanny $21.5 for all three. This way we have room for performance raises ect.
Anonymous wrote:
I have worked for free, thank you.
You make yourself sound like the ultimate materialist. Maybe you take pride in that label?
By no means do I expect you to know this, but stability IS actually a critical ingredient when raising young children. That's why many parents (and nannies!), will bend over backwards to work towards a longterm relationship.
Children pay a price for every major upheaval in their lives. Smart parents do their best to minimize unnecessary changeovers of primary caregivers.