Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Your experience is unusual, as many posters have pointed out. It isn't advantageous for a family to agree to have a nanny bring her own child except for financial advantages. Any other advantages are your opinion. Your one and only opinion. Which isn't really important here.
You may have your personal opinion as I have mine. As it's been explained to you, my opinions are based on many years of extensive experience. Is your opinion even based on any actual experience, however limited it might be?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Every family and nanny are entitled to their own opinions and preferences, and should function accordingly.
This is what I already said for you who has English comprehension issues.
Anonymous wrote:
Every family and nanny are entitled to their own opinions and preferences, and should function accordingly.
Anonymous wrote:Your mentality seems to be overly limited. My thinking, on the other hand, strives for win-win-win for all concerned. If it's done right, that's how it should be. Because I've already had positive experiences, I know it can work beautifully.
You, however, haven't had a single positive experience with it, so all you know is that it can't possibly be a benefit to all concerned.
You don't seem to understand that you are speaking to several people, not one, who disagree with you. It's lovely that it has worked for you. Stop assuming, though, that it's a win-win-win for all concerned. Many people have brought up why it would not be a win for them. They don't need to have experience riding a bicycle in traffic to know that it's a bad idea for them. Stop badgering people to agree with you that this is a good idea.
It isn't for anyone on this thread but you.
Your mentality seems to be overly limited. My thinking, on the other hand, strives for win-win-win for all concerned. If it's done right, that's how it should be. Because I've already had positive experiences, I know it can work beautifully.
You, however, haven't had a single positive experience with it, so all you know is that it can't possibly be a benefit to all concerned.
Anonymous wrote:Again, please explain what, besides self-interest, would motivate the nanny to seek a job which allows her to bring her child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Your experience is unusual, as many posters have pointed out. It isn't advantageous for a family to agree to have a nanny bring her own child except for financial advantages. Any other advantages are your opinion. Your one and only opinion. Which isn't really important here.
You may have your personal opinion as I have mine. As it's been explained to you, my opinions are based on many years of extensive experience. Is your opinion even based on any actual experience, however limited it might be?
She doesn't need experience to have an opinion. Your opinion, however well-informed it may be, comes from a place of self-interest, as it is undoubtedly to the nanny's advantage to bring her child with her. Even if you had a hundred years of experience, your opinion could not be considered impartial.
Self-interest? You may speak for yourself, but not for me. Thank you.
Please explain how nanny bringing her child along is NOT in her interest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Your experience is unusual, as many posters have pointed out. It isn't advantageous for a family to agree to have a nanny bring her own child except for financial advantages. Any other advantages are your opinion. Your one and only opinion. Which isn't really important here.
You may have your personal opinion as I have mine. As it's been explained to you, my opinions are based on many years of extensive experience. Is your opinion even based on any actual experience, however limited it might be?
She doesn't need experience to have an opinion. Your opinion, however well-informed it may be, comes from a place of self-interest, as it is undoubtedly to the nanny's advantage to bring her child with her. Even if you had a hundred years of experience, your opinion could not be considered impartial.
Self-interest? You may speak for yourself, but not for me. Thank you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Your experience is unusual, as many posters have pointed out. It isn't advantageous for a family to agree to have a nanny bring her own child except for financial advantages. Any other advantages are your opinion. Your one and only opinion. Which isn't really important here.
You may have your personal opinion as I have mine. As it's been explained to you, my opinions are based on many years of extensive experience. Is your opinion even based on any actual experience, however limited it might be?
She doesn't need experience to have an opinion. Your opinion, however well-informed it may be, comes from a place of self-interest, as it is undoubtedly to the nanny's advantage to bring her child with her. Even if you had a hundred years of experience, your opinion could not be considered impartial.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Your experience is unusual, as many posters have pointed out. It isn't advantageous for a family to agree to have a nanny bring her own child except for financial advantages. Any other advantages are your opinion. Your one and only opinion. Which isn't really important here.
You may have your personal opinion as I have mine. As it's been explained to you, my opinions are based on many years of extensive experience. Is your opinion even based on any actual experience, however limited it might be?
Anonymous wrote:
Your experience is unusual, as many posters have pointed out. It isn't advantageous for a family to agree to have a nanny bring her own child except for financial advantages. Any other advantages are your opinion. Your one and only opinion. Which isn't really important here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
PP again. Forgot to mention that I agree that a nanny who brings her child is not necessarily any less professional than one who doesn't, provided that this doesn't interfere with her ability to treat the job like a job and provided further that she is reasonable enough to recognize that being permitted to bring her child is a perk for her, not a benefit for you.
You are relentless, 18:02, with your utter nonsense. Just because you couldn't make it work out for you, doesn't mean that it doesn't work out very well for many other families, especially those with only one child.
It's called a mutual benefit, otherwise known as win-win-win, for MB, Nanny, and most of all the children, who both get the best possible care.
There are just as many families for whom it doesn't work out. You have no way to tell which is more common.
Unlike yourself, I continue to speak for myself and my own personal experiences and those with other families. You are the one with the "always" and "never" nonsense?
Why get angry when someone disagrees with you? Argue with opinions, don't get personal. This is an anonymous board. You have no idea who posts and who you are arguing with. You may think it's the same person but may as well be a dozen different ones.
What makes you think I get angry when someone disagrees with me?
Probably your constant characterizing of anyone who disagrees with you as someone who is spouting "nonsense".
Your experience is unusual, as many posters have pointed out. It isn't advantageous for a family to agree to have a nanny bring her own child except for financial advantages. Any other advantages are your opinion. Your one and only opinion. Which isn't really important here.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
PP again. Forgot to mention that I agree that a nanny who brings her child is not necessarily any less professional than one who doesn't, provided that this doesn't interfere with her ability to treat the job like a job and provided further that she is reasonable enough to recognize that being permitted to bring her child is a perk for her, not a benefit for you.
You are relentless, 18:02, with your utter nonsense. Just because you couldn't make it work out for you, doesn't mean that it doesn't work out very well for many other families, especially those with only one child.
It's called a mutual benefit, otherwise known as win-win-win, for MB, Nanny, and most of all the children, who both get the best possible care.
There are just as many families for whom it doesn't work out. You have no way to tell which is more common.
Unlike yourself, I continue to speak for myself and my own personal experiences and those with other families. You are the one with the "always" and "never" nonsense?
Why get angry when someone disagrees with you? Argue with opinions, don't get personal. This is an anonymous board. You have no idea who posts and who you are arguing with. You may think it's the same person but may as well be a dozen different ones.
What makes you think I get angry when someone disagrees with me?