Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it is a full rentable apartment, you could just rent it out as such and have a live out nanny. That way you get the full rent from the apartment and that will offset nanny costs.
But then they couldn't have the benefits of a live-in nanny. Why do you think so many parents DEMAND for the nanny to live-in?
"Live-out nannies need NOT apply."
Most parents do not demand the nanny live in. The only ones that "demand" it are those that advertise a live-in position.
Exactly. When they say live-in, they don't want to talk with live-outs. They want to keep you under their nose, and control.
So when they say, "principals only", do you think they like to discriminate against agencies?
Who cares?
Exactly. Who cares if an ad doesn't apply to you? You move on!
Legalized discrimination. Thanks.
Wow. You are being deliberately obtuse.
Don't you like how you're allowed to discriminate against nannies?
Who else is forced to pass up a potential job, just because of where she wants to lay her head at night?
No one. No. One.
Anyone whose work requires travel or other work arrangments (like cruise ships, oil rigs, nurses, doctors etc.) You seem very unaware of the world around you.
All those workers do their stints and then go home. No employer has a right to demand that their workplace IS their "home." You seem super stupid today.
Breathe, pp. Breathe.
Can your boss fire you if you don't want to live at your place of work?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No I haven't heard such things, ever. I know families with the opposite arrangement - nanny lives out on the weekend and they like it that way.
Aren't you discriminating against Spanish speakers right now? Oh.. no. No. NO!!! Lolz.
+1. It is a big plus to us if the nanny has somewhere else to live on the weekend.
Anonymous wrote:No I haven't heard such things, ever. I know families with the opposite arrangement - nanny lives out on the weekend and they like it that way.
Aren't you discriminating against Spanish speakers right now? Oh.. no. No. NO!!! Lolz.
Anonymous wrote:No I haven't heard such things, ever. I know families with the opposite arrangement - nanny lives out on the weekend and they like it that way.
Aren't you discriminating against Spanish speakers right now? Oh.. no. No. NO!!! Lolz.
Anonymous wrote:Why would you want to be hired for such a job? It's a free country. Also, some nannies do live-in during the week and go to their own place on days off. It is exactly like the shift work examples above.
Anonymous wrote:Being a live in nanny is the worst job I've ever had. You would have to pay me $50/hr to ever live with my employers ever again. It's not a perk for the nanny, she's living at her job!![/quo
You are absolutely right! The host family will take advantage of you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it is a full rentable apartment, you could just rent it out as such and have a live out nanny. That way you get the full rent from the apartment and that will offset nanny costs.
But then they couldn't have the benefits of a live-in nanny. Why do you think so many parents DEMAND for the nanny to live-in?
"Live-out nannies need NOT apply."
Most parents do not demand the nanny live in. The only ones that "demand" it are those that advertise a live-in position.
Exactly. When they say live-in, they don't want to talk with live-outs. They want to keep you under their nose, and control.
So when they say, "principals only", do you think they like to discriminate against agencies?
Who cares?
Exactly. Who cares if an ad doesn't apply to you? You move on!
Legalized discrimination. Thanks.
Wow. You are being deliberately obtuse.
Don't you like how you're allowed to discriminate against nannies?
Who else is forced to pass up a potential job, just because of where she wants to lay her head at night?
No one. No. One.
Anyone whose work requires travel or other work arrangments (like cruise ships, oil rigs, nurses, doctors etc.) You seem very unaware of the world around you.
All those workers do their stints and then go home. No employer has a right to demand that their workplace IS their "home." You seem super stupid today.
Breathe, pp. Breathe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it is a full rentable apartment, you could just rent it out as such and have a live out nanny. That way you get the full rent from the apartment and that will offset nanny costs.
But then they couldn't have the benefits of a live-in nanny. Why do you think so many parents DEMAND for the nanny to live-in?
"Live-out nannies need NOT apply."
Most parents do not demand the nanny live in. The only ones that "demand" it are those that advertise a live-in position.
Exactly. When they say live-in, they don't want to talk with live-outs. They want to keep you under their nose, and control.
So when they say, "principals only", do you think they like to discriminate against agencies?
Who cares?
Exactly. Who cares if an ad doesn't apply to you? You move on!
Legalized discrimination. Thanks.
Wow. You are being deliberately obtuse.
Don't you like how you're allowed to discriminate against nannies?
Who else is forced to pass up a potential job, just because of where she wants to lay her head at night?
No one. No. One.
Anyone whose work requires travel or other work arrangments (like cruise ships, oil rigs, nurses, doctors etc.) You seem very unaware of the world around you.
All those workers do their stints and then go home. No employer has a right to demand that their workplace IS their "home." You seem super stupid today.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it is a full rentable apartment, you could just rent it out as such and have a live out nanny. That way you get the full rent from the apartment and that will offset nanny costs.
But then they couldn't have the benefits of a live-in nanny. Why do you think so many parents DEMAND for the nanny to live-in?
"Live-out nannies need NOT apply."
Most parents do not demand the nanny live in. The only ones that "demand" it are those that advertise a live-in position.
Exactly. When they say live-in, they don't want to talk with live-outs. They want to keep you under their nose, and control.
So when they say, "principals only", do you think they like to discriminate against agencies?
Who cares?
Exactly. Who cares if an ad doesn't apply to you? You move on!
Legalized discrimination. Thanks.
Wow. You are being deliberately obtuse.
Don't you like how you're allowed to discriminate against nannies?
Who else is forced to pass up a potential job, just because of where she wants to lay her head at night?
No one. No. One.
Anyone whose work requires travel or other work arrangments (like cruise ships, oil rigs, nurses, doctors etc.) You seem very unaware of the world around you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it is a full rentable apartment, you could just rent it out as such and have a live out nanny. That way you get the full rent from the apartment and that will offset nanny costs.
But then they couldn't have the benefits of a live-in nanny. Why do you think so many parents DEMAND for the nanny to live-in?
"Live-out nannies need NOT apply."
Most parents do not demand the nanny live in. The only ones that "demand" it are those that advertise a live-in position.
Exactly. When they say live-in, they don't want to talk with live-outs. They want to keep you under their nose, and control.
So when they say, "principals only", do you think they like to discriminate against agencies?
Who cares?
Exactly. Who cares if an ad doesn't apply to you? You move on!
Legalized discrimination. Thanks.
Wow. You are being deliberately obtuse.
Don't you like how you're allowed to discriminate against nannies?
Who else is forced to pass up a potential job, just because of where she wants to lay her head at night?
No one. No. One.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If it is a full rentable apartment, you could just rent it out as such and have a live out nanny. That way you get the full rent from the apartment and that will offset nanny costs.
But then they couldn't have the benefits of a live-in nanny. Why do you think so many parents DEMAND for the nanny to live-in?
"Live-out nannies need NOT apply."
Most parents do not demand the nanny live in. The only ones that "demand" it are those that advertise a live-in position.
Exactly. When they say live-in, they don't want to talk with live-outs. They want to keep you under their nose, and control.
So when they say, "principals only", do you think they like to discriminate against agencies?
Who cares?
Exactly. Who cares if an ad doesn't apply to you? You move on!
Legalized discrimination. Thanks.
Wow. You are being deliberately obtuse.
Don't you like how you're allowed to discriminate against nannies?
Who else is forced to pass up a potential job, just because of where she wants to lay her head at night?
No one. No. One.