Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's fair for her to ask you to set a healthy example for the kids but that she should provide your meals if that's her priority. You can say, "MB, I completely understand where you're coming from but I don't purchase those foods for myself and don't plan to change my grocery shopping habits any time soon. I'm happy to continue bringing my own lunch but if you have concerns about what I'm eating why don't I make my lunch here with the kids? Since you don't stock junk food in the house you can be sure that my eating is setting a good example for them." If she isn't ok with that you need a new job.
I'm a MB and I agree with this 100%, it is a very sensible approach. I agree that nannies should be modelling healthy eating habits. However, the MB should have actually offered to supply your food. The fact that she didn't and just basically ordered you to change your eating habits regardless of any inconvenience or cost to you makes me wonder what kind of employer she is.
Anonymous wrote:I think it's fair for her to ask you to set a healthy example for the kids but that she should provide your meals if that's her priority. You can say, "MB, I completely understand where you're coming from but I don't purchase those foods for myself and don't plan to change my grocery shopping habits any time soon. I'm happy to continue bringing my own lunch but if you have concerns about what I'm eating why don't I make my lunch here with the kids? Since you don't stock junk food in the house you can be sure that my eating is setting a good example for them." If she isn't ok with that you need a new job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
She is not being a robot, she is an employee who takes her job seriously and knows that her own preferences and wants do not trump those of the family she works for. It's amazing to see how affronted people become at a simple request like "don't eat like crap in front of my kids". This is a job that requires you to be an example the entire time you are on, why should health and diet be an exemption? OP, if you really need to eat a bag of cheetos or some oreos each day, wait until you get home. This is not an attack on your personal liberties, simply a term of employment request (which should be able to evolve with a family's/nanny's needs).
+1
There is no job in the world that remains the same as it was the day they hired you, unless you're represented by a union that dictates every move you and the employer can make. As issues arise (for the nanny or the family), they need to be addressed and dealt with. Jobs evolve. Everyone has had a moment in a job where they had to decide whether to go with the new requirements or leave. Being jobless puts a lot of things in perspective ...
And so many of you talk about how nannies need to be seen as professionals in child-development. Well, every single parenting book out there tells you that if you want kids who make healthy food choices, they need to live those choices and see their parents live them. They eat with the nanny every single day -- her job is, in part, to model what it means to make good choices. Should the family have had to tell the nanny the day she was hired that she can't use foul language around the children? Play on her phone all day long? Take them to church with her? Or, should those issues arise, shoudln't the family address them at that point?
Anonymous wrote:
She is not being a robot, she is an employee who takes her job seriously and knows that her own preferences and wants do not trump those of the family she works for. It's amazing to see how affronted people become at a simple request like "don't eat like crap in front of my kids". This is a job that requires you to be an example the entire time you are on, why should health and diet be an exemption? OP, if you really need to eat a bag of cheetos or some oreos each day, wait until you get home. This is not an attack on your personal liberties, simply a term of employment request (which should be able to evolve with a family's/nanny's needs).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess I disagree with the majority...but I am a nanny and compensated very well to be exactly what the parents want me to be..I am careful what music I play on the radio...what I would put on the tv...I dress nicely every day because I am out with these kids all day and it's a reflection one the family....so I don't see how this is different. Some parents don't want their kids to be around chips etc..if its a good job and you like it, why not just pack fruit, yogurt, healthy leftovers etc...maybe I am crazy but I can see where this moms coming from..I tell the 2 I nanny all the time that food like chips, Doritos etc are for other people not them so maybe that is a helpful response..I can see too where this would be offensive but I would try and roll with it.
Wow! A Stepford nanny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To the "free country" brigade: yes, she is free to have nothing but ice cream for lunch, just as her employer is free to fire her. Now that we've addressed our freedoms...
I would offer to eat what the children eat on their dime. If she objects, then explain that you are willing to change your eating habits, but not your shopping habits. She may fire you anyway, but you've then been more than reasonable and she is more likely to offer a good reference.
Not unless diet of nanny was a part of agreement. I'd eat cheetos, potato chips, fried bologna with onions, diet coke, and snack l day on Oreos. Those little kids woild be drooling and I would tell them, "Sorry. Your ma only wants you to eat tasteless styrofoam food. This is sooo good. Now eat your sugar-, fat-,and taste-free food."
Anonymous wrote:Also how is this different if the family keeps a kosher kitchen? Or if they are vegetarian and don't want you to heat meat in the microwave?