Anonymous wrote:$15 an hour really is a low wage in this region for an experienced professional nanny with CPR and first aid training, years of experience working with a wide range of kids, some early childhood training, and an amazing disposition with little ones. We've tended to pay these highly qualified nannies upwards of $22 an hour.
However, $15 is fine for a nanny who doesn't have the above qualities and experience and really is more of a babysitter who works a full day. Someone who is capable of providing basic care with no frills.
Given the choice, I'd always try to hire a highly qualified nanny and pay her what she's worth. But I can respect that sometimes people can only afford the $15 an hour type.
I do not, however, expect a highly qualified nanny to lower her payscale or salary standards to meet that $15 an hour rate.
Please don't compare ours job nanny ,for the people that fries pototoes and make sandwiches ,be a nanny it's a lots responsability,.
You think taking care of the baby/toddler is easy? Come ...stop that!
Anonymous wrote:Most of the $15 per hour nannies do NOT pay taxes. I think that's the main take away point here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not a nanny but I do not understand why anyone wouId take care of a child for less than $30.00 an hour. Some of you are taking care of two or three for less than $20/hr. Crazy.
Exactly. Child care is one of the hardest, but most important jobs there is. If you mess-up, well we know the probable results. And we ALL pay for that.
Think about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What nannies don't realize is that some starting salary lawyers don't even make 45,000 a year. I made less than that at my first law job. And law students usually have loans. You find ways to get by. I think some nannies on this forum think they should make more, but they don't realize that the employer can't always afford to pay more.
This. I made $30k out of law school and had over $100k in loans from college and law school. It wasn't for a number of years until I made more.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is how many people believe:
Warm Body = Nanny
It's so darn sad.
Anonymous wrote:What nannies don't realize is that some starting salary lawyers don't even make 45,000 a year. I made less than that at my first law job. And law students usually have loans. You find ways to get by. I think some nannies on this forum think they should make more, but they don't realize that the employer can't always afford to pay more.
Anonymous wrote:Just for kicks, would anyone care to sketch a hypothetical budget for a DC area live-out nanny earning $15 per hour? Guesstimate 30% for taxes, rent, utilities, student loans, car loans, food, clothing, etc., etc.
I am wondering how they do it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just like any other "lower" paying job.
I'm in Los Angeles - guess what McDonalds employees make minimum wage. The background on the TV shows and movies make $8/hour.
And rent here is also high. Once saw a person renting their dining room for 575/month another was a sofa (just the sofa no storage for $250.
Lots of roommates an
d living paycheck to paycheck.
P
Please don't compare ours job nanny ,for the people that fries pototoes and make sandwiches ,be a nanny it's a lots responsability,.
You think taking care of the baby/toddler is easy? Come ...stop that!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you, 19:01, for posting. The reason why most good nannies are nannies, is because they really love to care for children. It's such an embarrassing shame how many parents look down on those who are raising their children. It seems that for many of these parents, the children are just another commodity to add to their portfolios.
Some of you guys simply don't understand supply / demand economics. Nannies often balk at getting paid anything less than $45k/year, but keep in mind that the number of people who can afford to pay $55k/year (including employer taxes and other costs plus salary) AFTER TAX on a nanny need to bring in a significant amount of $$$. And the reality is that there are only so many couple who make well over $250k/year employing nannies. The demand just isn't there and then there is a LOT of competition for those high paying jobs.
Sorry, but that doesn't mean parents look down on a nanny or don't value the nanny. The going rate for an inexperienced nanny for 1-2 kids is just simply not over $15/hour.
This. Valuing a nanny and paying more are not the same thing - parents pay what they can afford. If the market demanded nannies were paid over $45 K a year, it's not that people would pay more - it's that they would employ nannies less and many of the nannies on this board would be out of a job.