Anonymous wrote:I would assume you are not working if you can get by without a nanny. So in your situation I would pay half her salary. It's not her fault she's not working.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are continuing to pay our nanny as well. We’re on the books, so she has the option to file for unemployment. We’re planning to pay at least through May or June, but what happens if this continues through September? What is a reasonable timeframe/notice?
Ok I don’t get this at all... if the nanny isn’t coming in why is anyone paying anything ? Wouldn’t it be smarter to just lay her off then she could file unemployment for x amount of time. If the unemployment is 600 a week on top of the state ( let’s say $850 per week total) that’s way more than most nanny’s take home anyway. And then you can hire her back later if you both wish. Am I missing something??
+100
Anonymous wrote:"People who quit their jobs are not eligible. "
That's not true. We were told to stay home and shelter in place, or protect ourselves if living with underlying health conditions, so we had no choice but to quit, and yes we still can apply.
Anonymous wrote:How so? We are facing a global health crisis. Have you seen the news lately?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are continuing to pay our nanny as well. We’re on the books, so she has the option to file for unemployment. We’re planning to pay at least through May or June, but what happens if this continues through September? What is a reasonable timeframe/notice?
Ok I don’t get this at all... if the nanny isn’t coming in why is anyone paying anything ? Wouldn’t it be smarter to just lay her off then she could file unemployment for x amount of time. If the unemployment is 600 a week on top of the state ( let’s say $850 per week total) that’s way more than most nanny’s take home anyway. And then you can hire her back later if you both wish. Am I missing something??
Nobody is getting $600 plus normal unemployment.
https://gtm.com/household/expanded-unemployment-benefits/
$600 in addition to state level unemployment.
Anonymous wrote:I’m the PP that mentioned paying my nanny in lieu of laying her off. Yes, she would be able to get unemployment, so it makes sense for us to lay her off since we’re not using her.
I just don’t know how long the SAH order will last, and I worry that if things turn around quickly (doubtful I know) she’ll find someone else to work for and we will have to start the nanny search all over. She’s great with my kids, and we don’t want to lose her. She won’t social distance, so even if things get a little better, I wouldn’t be comfortable having her come right away. My DH and I are both working from home right now, it’s not ideal with two small kids, but a lot of people are in this boat.