Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are you paying her for 32 hours when she is only working 40?
Op here. I already explained it’s to keep a good nanny. Most nannies will not work for 32 hours very long. My husbands co-worker has had 4 nannies in a span of 6 months because they only need a part-time nanny. We don’t want to have to go through several nannies so we pay for a 40 hour work week. It’s more money but worth the hassle to look every couple of months.
We didn’t put homemade baby food in our contract, but that’s because we didn’t know what we were going to do until he started solids. I will keep doing it, but I think we pay her well enough that it shouldn’t be an issue. We will never go beyond anything for the baby.
For the poster this asked - we live in Great Falls. We both have high paying jobs and can afford it. I even posted this question a couple of times and everyone agreed that paying for 40 hours while only working 32 was a good perk. That’s what we chose.
It's not about what you can afford, it's about the message it sends to your nanny. You were offering every perk in the book from day 1 so she has no incentive to go above and beyond (or even do work that falls under a nanny job but wasn't part of her duties to start). I agree with you that it can be harder to keep part-time nannies. We too needed 32 hours and we made the position appealing by offering a higher hourly wage. This is pretty common for part time nanny jobs. You are already doing that so paying 8 unused hours as well is overkill.
Are you going to talk to her? Stewing in silence will only create resentment and you will surely face this problem again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are you paying her for 32 hours when she is only working 40?
Op here. I already explained it’s to keep a good nanny. Most nannies will not work for 32 hours very long. My husbands co-worker has had 4 nannies in a span of 6 months because they only need a part-time nanny. We don’t want to have to go through several nannies so we pay for a 40 hour work week. It’s more money but worth the hassle to look every couple of months.
We didn’t put homemade baby food in our contract, but that’s because we didn’t know what we were going to do until he started solids. I will keep doing it, but I think we pay her well enough that it shouldn’t be an issue. We will never go beyond anything for the baby.
For the poster this asked - we live in Great Falls. We both have high paying jobs and can afford it. I even posted this question a couple of times and everyone agreed that paying for 40 hours while only working 32 was a good perk. That’s what we chose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I think you have been overly generous from the get-go and your nanny sees no reason to extend herself in any way for you. Why should she? You are way overpaying (you should not be paying her for 8 extra hours not worked every week) and giving her significant perks. The birthday gift was too much given how long she'd been with you. We learned all this the hard way. I would have a sit down talk with her and explain that duties will change as time goes on, baby food clearly falls under her general duties, and you expect her to take this on. She should do this without batting an eye and the fact that she won't is concerning.
+1. Your compensation package is so good, that she doesn't see why she should have to work much for it. I second the poster who says to start over. Either offer the same package, and find an extraordinary nanny who will actually tell you what she can be doing for your child, or offer less to start and reward excellent nannying with raises and more perks.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I think you have been overly generous from the get-go and your nanny sees no reason to extend herself in any way for you. Why should she? You are way overpaying (you should not be paying her for 8 extra hours not worked every week) and giving her significant perks. The birthday gift was too much given how long she'd been with you. We learned all this the hard way. I would have a sit down talk with her and explain that duties will change as time goes on, baby food clearly falls under her general duties, and you expect her to take this on. She should do this without batting an eye and the fact that she won't is concerning.
Anonymous wrote:Is she an $18 or $28/hr nanny?
That might be the bottom line. If she's a well-compensated professional, she might be more inclined to help you make the baby food.
Anonymous wrote:Why are you paying her for 32 hours when she is only working 40?
OP, I think you have been overly generous from the get-go and your nanny sees no reason to extend herself in any way for you. Why should she? You are way overpaying (you should not be paying her for 8 extra hours not worked every week) and giving her significant perks. The birthday gift was too much given how long she'd been with you. We learned all this the hard way. I would have a sit down talk with her and explain that duties will change as time goes on, baby food clearly falls under her general duties, and you expect her to take this on. She should do this without batting an eye and the fact that she won't is concerning.
Anonymous wrote:Why are you paying her for 32 hours when she is only working 40?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really never heard about that if you work 32 hours and your employer pay you for 40 hours.
Op here. We wanted to make sure we don’t lose a good nanny over hours. It’s more money but well spent to know we have someone who won’t leave in anknrh for more hours and pay. We want to provide a liveable income for our nanny.