Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nanny here. I don't know ANY parent around me (family, friends, employers) who constantly talk to their babies.
You are insane for believing nannies will do that all day just because you feel you need to get your $ worth.
First, what your employer does is not any of your business. It is stunningly immature of you to think it is comparable.
Second, I am a nanny and I actively engage even my newborn charges with narration, singing and reading as well as conversation. It is more than possible, PP. I do it because it is in the best interest of the child and that is my job.
Anonymous wrote:Nanny here. I don't know ANY parent around me (family, friends, employers) who constantly talk to their babies.
You are insane for believing nannies will do that all day just because you feel you need to get your $ worth.
Anonymous wrote:https://mobile.nytimes.com/1997/04/17/us/studies-show-talking-with-infants-shapes-basis-of-ability-to-think.html
http://www.npr.org/2011/01/10/132740565/closing-the-achievement-gap-with-baby-talk
These are not new findings. Anyone remotely educated should know that taking to babies is vital to their development.
Anonymous wrote:So, your nanny is talking to the baby, about once very five minutes? So, about 20 times an hour? Do you have any idea how much she talks to the baby while taking her for a walk, or feeding her, or in places other than the baby's room?
Yes, babies need to be spoken and sung to, but they do not need constant 1-on-1 narration and interaction. They really don't.