Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree with poster at 20:44. This nanny was clearly advocating for this baby and the parents/doctors completely ignored her. They clearly think they are smarter than a simple nanny with no medical training. I am in nursing school and believe me not eliminating urine and projectile vomiting over 24h warrant concern with healthcare providers. Won't get into the science here but I am very shocked at the actions of these supposedly doctor parents. Nanny should report this to child protective services something shady is going on here.

Concern, yes. But they don't actually DO anything until they see signs of clinical dehydration.

Also, he clearly wasn't projectile vomiting all of his bottles because the parents were feeding him and didn't see it.

Do you know what's dangerous? A lot of unnecessary trips to the petri dish known as the doctor's office.

And the child is fine. So, clearly, he did not need to have intervention days earlier. And yes, those parents were qualified to determine that.

You know what, OP, report these parents to CPS. You think they are neglectful, and if you really believe they withheld life-saving treatment, they should be reported.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op here. Maybe I am explaining it wrong but DB told me about the signs on like day 3. This was going on day 5 of baby spitting up 90% of his bottles. The day they went on a date night, they had not see him all day except for a half hour in the morning. The night prior, I put him to bed at 6pm and he had not had a wet diaper when he woke up at 6am that morning. He didn't have any wet diapers all day. I put him to bed at 6pm ( 24 hours without a wet diaper) before they MB and DB came home. I told them he should knew taken in because he still couldn't hold down his formula and didn't have wet diapers for 24 hours. MB said she was worried but they still went out that night. They took him into immediate care 8/9am the next day. He had still not had a wet diaper which would have been 36+ hours. Regardless of being a resident physician, they should have taken him in. They hadn't been able to properly assess him because they hadn't seen him all day long.

I still think it's kind of bizarre that you think that you know more about medicine than a doctor. Who do you think is going to be assessing him at the hospital? Wizards?
If the baby wasn't dehydrated enough to warrant an iv, then there isn't much they are going to do at the hospital.

I'm in school for pediatric nursing. I may not know everything but I know when it's times to take the baby in. The baby did need an IV. They kept him for about 2 hours and had him on an IV and gave him anti-nausea meds and tylenol. I'm sure if the roles were reversed and the nanny was in charge, people would be siding with the parents. They were in the wrong. I was in the situation to better assess him because they see him maybe a total of 2 hours throughout the entire week. This board is full of nanny haters when you should knew thankful of nannies who do the jobs you aren't willing to do.

Your story has seemed off this whole time and NOW I call troll. Disregarding your made up "pediatric nursing" school track no 6 month old that needed IV fluids would have been kept in and ED for 2 hours...and they definitely wouldn't have given zofran. Nice try OP.

I'm an mb. My 5 month old had a bad bug that made him dehydrated. He was given fluids and an anti-nausea medicine. They kept him for 3 hours to monitor him. What is your medical background, captain know it all?

I'm PNP and former pediatric ED nurse. So yeah, I probably know a bit more than you.

I call bs on your credentials. If you were a nurse, you must have not been a very good one if you don't know that dehydrated can be put on an IV and administered nausea medicine when sick. I don't see how a supposed pediatric ED nurse doesn't know that. I don't believe your educational background. I think anyone in the medical profession knows this can happen for sick and dehydrated patients who can't keep liquids or food down.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op here. Maybe I am explaining it wrong but DB told me about the signs on like day 3. This was going on day 5 of baby spitting up 90% of his bottles. The day they went on a date night, they had not see him all day except for a half hour in the morning. The night prior, I put him to bed at 6pm and he had not had a wet diaper when he woke up at 6am that morning. He didn't have any wet diapers all day. I put him to bed at 6pm ( 24 hours without a wet diaper) before they MB and DB came home. I told them he should knew taken in because he still couldn't hold down his formula and didn't have wet diapers for 24 hours. MB said she was worried but they still went out that night. They took him into immediate care 8/9am the next day. He had still not had a wet diaper which would have been 36+ hours. Regardless of being a resident physician, they should have taken him in. They hadn't been able to properly assess him because they hadn't seen him all day long.

I still think it's kind of bizarre that you think that you know more about medicine than a doctor. Who do you think is going to be assessing him at the hospital? Wizards?
If the baby wasn't dehydrated enough to warrant an iv, then there isn't much they are going to do at the hospital.

I'm in school for pediatric nursing. I may not know everything but I know when it's times to take the baby in. The baby did need an IV. They kept him for about 2 hours and had him on an IV and gave him anti-nausea meds and tylenol. I'm sure if the roles were reversed and the nanny was in charge, people would be siding with the parents. They were in the wrong. I was in the situation to better assess him because they see him maybe a total of 2 hours throughout the entire week. This board is full of nanny haters when you should knew thankful of nannies who do the jobs you aren't willing to do.

Your story has seemed off this whole time and NOW I call troll. Disregarding your made up "pediatric nursing" school track no 6 month old that needed IV fluids would have been kept in and ED for 2 hours...and they definitely wouldn't have given zofran. Nice try OP.

I'm an mb. My 5 month old had a bad bug that made him dehydrated. He was given fluids and an anti-nausea medicine. They kept him for 3 hours to monitor him. What is your medical background, captain know it all?

I'm PNP and former pediatric ED nurse. So yeah, I probably know a bit more than you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Op here. Maybe I am explaining it wrong but DB told me about the signs on like day 3. This was going on day 5 of baby spitting up 90% of his bottles. The day they went on a date night, they had not see him all day except for a half hour in the morning. The night prior, I put him to bed at 6pm and he had not had a wet diaper when he woke up at 6am that morning. He didn't have any wet diapers all day. I put him to bed at 6pm ( 24 hours without a wet diaper) before they MB and DB came home. I told them he should knew taken in because he still couldn't hold down his formula and didn't have wet diapers for 24 hours. MB said she was worried but they still went out that night. They took him into immediate care 8/9am the next day. He had still not had a wet diaper which would have been 36+ hours. Regardless of being a resident physician, they should have taken him in. They hadn't been able to properly assess him because they hadn't seen him all day long.

I still think it's kind of bizarre that you think that you know more about medicine than a doctor. Who do you think is going to be assessing him at the hospital? Wizards?
If the baby wasn't dehydrated enough to warrant an iv, then there isn't much they are going to do at the hospital.

I'm in school for pediatric nursing. I may not know everything but I know when it's times to take the baby in. The baby did need an IV. They kept him for about 2 hours and had him on an IV and gave him anti-nausea meds and tylenol. I'm sure if the roles were reversed and the nanny was in charge, people would be siding with the parents. They were in the wrong. I was in the situation to better assess him because they see him maybe a total of 2 hours throughout the entire week. This board is full of nanny haters when you should knew thankful of nannies who do the jobs you aren't willing to do.

Your story has seemed off this whole time and NOW I call troll. Disregarding your made up "pediatric nursing" school track no 6 month old that needed IV fluids would have been kept in and ED for 2 hours...and they definitely wouldn't have given zofran. Nice try OP.

I'm an mb. My 5 month old had a bad bug that made him dehydrated. He was given fluids and an anti-nausea medicine. They kept him for 3 hours to monitor him. What is your medical background, captain know it all?