Anonymous wrote:OP here.
With the exception of the morning breakfast routine and dinner routine, which I understand other WOH parents I know have their APs work at least a little so they can get dressed / get food on the table, it was not my plan to just be around the house while the AP was working. In fact, my ideal would be that when the AP was not working, she would be out and about doing all sorts of fun things on her own. And when she was working, she could be with one or two kids doing her thing, and I would be with the other one or two doing my thing. I really understand why she has no authority or ability to establish her routine if I'm home. I respect that.
Look, I understand what everyone is saying, but I think that the blanket rule against working for SAHM that I am now slowly (from other sources) understanding APs have is totally misguided. I know several families with APs and moms who WOH and it is a true full-time job: the AP is (duh) tied to the kid nearly all day (I realize this is not true for school age kids, I'm more familiar with the under-5 set), can't go out while kid is napping, can't do anything during the day. This would be SO MUCH LESS than that.
Plus, it's my understanding that APs are frequently seeking things like families that will bring them with to travel to cool places, or sponsor them as students afterwards. Who do they think is more likely to do that? The WOH parents who are getting an AP because it's cheaper than a nanny? It's the SAHMs like me who don't think twice about paying for an AP who will also do those things. (And I'm not saying dual WOH parents can't technically be very high-income... but every very high-income family I know has either an at-home mom or a nanny. Occasionally both a nanny and an au pair. But rarely just an au pair. They don't work enough hours and are too much work themselves, and are too temporary.)
The only reason I started considering an AP was because we hired a neighbor's AP after my second child was born; their kids were gone for the summer and they didn't need her anymore. She was amazing. She did almost exactly what I've described, for 20 hours a week, though she didn't live with us. We didn't get into conflicts. I gave her space. Sometimes I was home (esp. when napping, since I'd just had a baby), sometimes I wasn't. I didn't expect her to be a maid. I don't think she did a single chore. And frankly, I loved her. After 2.5 months my husband and I seriously, seriously considered sponsoring her just because we liked her and knew she wanted to be a student, even though her family (who had her for 2 years) didn't (because they would never be able to have afforded it).
I believe what you all are saying, that I wouldn't get a good AP, but I think that the good APs would be making a mistake. They shouldn't all dismiss SAHMs. And sorry if I come across as offended, but honestly, I am a little offended that the the assumption is I'm living a fantasy / trying to make my future au pair be a maid / will inevitably interfere.
Uh, a lot of working families bring their AuPairs on vacation. We took our last one to Africa for 3.5 weeks to see the great migration in the Masi Mara, Amboseli, Ol Pajeta, and then a few days at the Indian Ocean.
Oh and BTW, an AuPair is a MUCH more expensive proposition since my kids are school aged. I could save a fortune on the dedicated AuPair car I supply, fees, and trips if i just did aftercare. Aftercare would cost about 75% less.
You have weird ideas about what is involved in hosting and what is ideal or desired. Best of luck to you!