[b]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[b]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At 18 (or even 17) I would have been fully up to the task. It's probably because I have a good work ethic and babysat plenty. Why on god's green earth could an 18/19 yr old not be capable of caring for an infant?
I suppose if your standards are keeping them alive, sure.
APs are not here to watch your children. They are here to party, meet new people, and experience a new culture. On the side they watch your kids. Not the profile that any parent who values good childcare for their non verbal child goes for. But hey, whatever to save a buck. They are just kids, who cares?
At 18, I loved to party and meet new people. But during my day job I was extremely responsible. You make it sound like APs start drinking and clubbing the moment they wake up in the morning.
Are you a nanny by any chance? A bit unhappy about your job prospects being limited by the availability of other good choices?
This is always the standard reply, nannies are just jealous. Look lady, trust me when I say no nanny is ever jealous of an aupair job. Au pairs get the s*** stick of jobs and have to live with their employers, be a part of a family (ie: pitch in and help) and receive low pay. Nannies do not want these jobs and FEEL SORRY for Au pairs, ok? I say this because when I was 18 I was an aupair and at the time I was too young to realize what I was getting into. Expecting a young lady to care for a newborn, 3 year old and a 7 year old all summer with no camp just because you're cheap is not a job nannies want, so please get a new line.
So because YOU were an immature 18 yr old who just wanted to party and travel, that means ALL au pairs must be the same? I'm sorry you lacked the maturity or work ethic to do the job you committed to when you were 18. But please don't project YOUR inability to safely or appropriately care for young children onto all APs.
Anonymous wrote:[b]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At 18 (or even 17) I would have been fully up to the task. It's probably because I have a good work ethic and babysat plenty. Why on god's green earth could an 18/19 yr old not be capable of caring for an infant?
I suppose if your standards are keeping them alive, sure.
APs are not here to watch your children. They are here to party, meet new people, and experience a new culture. On the side they watch your kids. Not the profile that any parent who values good childcare for their non verbal child goes for. But hey, whatever to save a buck. They are just kids, who cares?
At 18, I loved to party and meet new people. But during my day job I was extremely responsible. You make it sound like APs start drinking and clubbing the moment they wake up in the morning.
Are you a nanny by any chance? A bit unhappy about your job prospects being limited by the availability of other good choices?
This is always the standard reply, nannies are just jealous. Look lady, trust me when I say no nanny is ever jealous of an aupair job. Au pairs get the s*** stick of jobs and have to live with their employers, be a part of a family (ie: pitch in and help) and receive low pay. Nannies do not want these jobs and FEEL SORRY for Au pairs, ok? I say this because when I was 18 I was an aupair and at the time I was too young to realize what I was getting into. Expecting a young lady to care for a newborn, 3 year old and a 7 year old all summer with no camp just because you're cheap is not a job nannies want, so please get a new line.
[b]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At 18 (or even 17) I would have been fully up to the task. It's probably because I have a good work ethic and babysat plenty. Why on god's green earth could an 18/19 yr old not be capable of caring for an infant?
I suppose if your standards are keeping them alive, sure.
APs are not here to watch your children. They are here to party, meet new people, and experience a new culture. On the side they watch your kids. Not the profile that any parent who values good childcare for their non verbal child goes for. But hey, whatever to save a buck. They are just kids, who cares?
At 18, I loved to party and meet new people. But during my day job I was extremely responsible. You make it sound like APs start drinking and clubbing the moment they wake up in the morning.
Are you a nanny by any chance? A bit unhappy about your job prospects being limited by the availability of other good choices?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At 18 (or even 17) I would have been fully up to the task. It's probably because I have a good work ethic and babysat plenty. Why on god's green earth could an 18/19 yr old not be capable of caring for an infant?
I suppose if your standards are keeping them alive, sure.
APs are not here to watch your children. They are here to party, meet new people, and experience a new culture. On the side they watch your kids. Not the profile that any parent who values good childcare for their non verbal child goes for. But hey, whatever to save a buck. They are just kids, who cares?
At 18, I loved to party and meet new people. But during my day job I was extremely responsible. You make it sound like APs start drinking and clubbing the moment they wake up in the morning.
Are you a nanny by any chance? A bit unhappy about your job prospects being limited by the availability of other good choices?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At 18 (or even 17) I would have been fully up to the task. It's probably because I have a good work ethic and babysat plenty. Why on god's green earth could an 18/19 yr old not be capable of caring for an infant?
I suppose if your standards are keeping them alive, sure.
APs are not here to watch your children. They are here to party, meet new people, and experience a new culture. On the side they watch your kids. Not the profile that any parent who values good childcare for their non verbal child goes for. But hey, whatever to save a buck. They are just kids, who cares?
Anonymous wrote:Dear nannies in search of a job or wealthy host moms who are proud of doing better for their kids than the rest of us, butt out please.
I have four kids also, and had an au pair last summer when youngest was 1, the rest were 5, 9 and 11, and the summer before, when they were 6 months old, 4, 8, and 10. Guess what, both of these au pairs did well, didn't rematch, completed my term with us, and the one who was here last summer even extended and is completing her extension term.
Moreover, my oldest was in the neighborhood summer swim team, and the au pair daily spent all morning in the pool until middle of july, with all four kids. She did their laundry, prepared their meals, and cleaned after the meals.
Each summer two oldest kids were in daycamp maybe a week, and also the third one was in day camp for a week, but a different week. Also I think one week two of them spent with my parents.
It can be done. Moms do it. Teachers do it. Camp counselors do it. A qualified and hard working au pair can do it. My new au pair is coming June 30 this year, and she will do it too, and will have lots of fun.
The key to success is to structure summer activities. I give my au pair library website, addresses of local parks, sites with lists of kiddie activities around here, farmers markets, free matinee kiddie movies, concerts, etc...
I ask her to make a schedule for every week with at least one outside activity every day. Also regular activities with other friends of my kids who are home for the summer...
With our membership and involvement in summer pool (swim team for one kid, lessons for one more...) this works.
Good luck to you.
Anonymous wrote:Thanks 17:45Agree - just ignoring the a*s and taking the good advice from the sincere posters. We are going into the program with our eyes wide open, I know there are plenty of times things don't work out, but we are going to try our best and hope we chose an au pair that will also try her best.
Anonymous wrote:At 18 (or even 17) I would have been fully up to the task. It's probably because I have a good work ethic and babysat plenty. Why on god's green earth could an 18/19 yr old not be capable of caring for an infant?